On the representation of modality
- Cite this article as:
- Ransom, E.N. Linguistics and Philosophy (1977) 1: 357. doi:10.1007/BF00353454
In this paper I argue that noun complement modality cannot be treated as dependent on the meanings of lexical embedding predicates or of abstract performatives. Using two types of complement modalities, I show that their meanings and restrictions remain distinct and invariable regardless of the meanings of their embedding predicates. Then, using embedding predicates that can take both types of modalities, I show that the embedding predicates retain their meanings, regardless of the different modalities of their complements, and they can undergo deletions requiring their identity.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.