Marine Biology

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 48–57

Benthic polychaete assemblages and their relationship to the sediment in Port Madison, Washington

  • F. H. Nichols
Article

Abstract

Two indices of community association and a 3 dimensional ordination of stations were used to elucidate the relationship between small-scale changes in species, composition of polychaete assemblages and changes in the physical character of the sediment, at 9 stations along a 1.5 km subtidal transect. There were no faunal or physical discontinuities that might have been used to delineate boundaries of polychaete communities, except at a very shallow station where the effects of extreme fluctuations of temperature and salinity were evident. The degree of similarity between assemblages was related to the similarity of the sediments at the different stations. In particular, the changes in species composition appeared to correspond most clearly to differences in the clay content of the sediment.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Banse, K., K. D. Horson and F. H. Nichols: Annotated list of polychaetes, pp 521–556. In: U. Lie: A quantitative study of benthic infauna in Puget Sound, Washington, U.S.A., in 1963–1964. FiskDir. Skr. (Ser. Havunders.) 14, 229–556 (1968).Google Scholar
  2. Berkeley, E. and C. Berkeley: Annelida, Polychaeta Errantia. Can. Pacif. Fauna 9b (1), 1–100 (1948).Google Scholar
  3. —: Annelida, Polychaeta Sedentaria. Can. Pacif. Fauna 9b (2), 1–139 (1952).Google Scholar
  4. Bray, J. R. and J. T. Curtis: An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27, 325–349 (1957).Google Scholar
  5. Creager, J. S., D. A. McManus and E. E. Collias: Electronic data processing in sedimentary size analyses. J. sedim. Petrl. 32, 833–839 (1962).Google Scholar
  6. Fager, E. W.: Communities of organisms. In: The sea, Vol. 2, pp 415–437. Ed. by M. N. Hill. New York: Interscience Publishers 1963.Google Scholar
  7. Greig-Smith, P.: Quantitative plant ecology, 256 pp. London: Butterworths 1964.Google Scholar
  8. Hartman, O.: Polychaetous annelids from California. Allan Hancock Pacif. Exped. 25, 1–226 (1961).Google Scholar
  9. Jones, N. S.: Marine bottom communities. Biol. Rev. 25, 283–313 (1950).Google Scholar
  10. Kendall, M. G.: Rank correlation methods. 3rd ed., 199 pp. New York: Hafner Publishing Co. 1962.Google Scholar
  11. Krumbein, W. C. and F. J. Pettijohn: Manual of sedimentary petrography, 549 pp. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc. 1938.Google Scholar
  12. Lie, U.: A quantitative study of benthic infauna in Puget Sound, Washington, U.S.A., in 1963–1964. Fisk Dir. Skr. (Ser. Havunders.) 14, 229–556 (1968).Google Scholar
  13. Looman, J. and J. B. Campbell: Adaptation of Sørenson's K (1948) for estimating unit affinities in prairie vegetation. Ecology 41, 409–416 (1960).Google Scholar
  14. McManus, D. A.: A criticism of certain usage of the phinotation. J. sedim. Petrol. 33, 670–674 (1963).Google Scholar
  15. Newell, R.: The role of detritus in the nutrition of two marine deposit feeders, the prosobranch Hydrobia ulvae and the bivalve Macoma balthica. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 144, 25–45 (1965).Google Scholar
  16. Nichols, F. H.: A quantitative study of benthic polychaete assemblages in Port Madison, Washington, 78 pp. Seattle: M. S. Thesis, Univ. Washington 1968.Google Scholar
  17. Petersen, C. G. J.: Valuation of the sea. 2. The animal communities of the sea-bottom and their importance for marine zoogeography. Rep. Dan. biol. Stn. 21, 1–44 (1913).Google Scholar
  18. Sanders, H. L.: Oceanography of Long Island Sound, 1952–1954. 10. The biology of marine bottom communities. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 15, 345–414 (1956).Google Scholar
  19. —: Benthic studies in Buzzards Bay. 1. Animal-sediment relationships. Limnol. Oceanogr. 3, 245–258 (1958).Google Scholar
  20. Snedecor, G. W.: Statistical methods. 5th ed., 534 pp. Ames: Iowa State Univ. Press 1956.Google Scholar
  21. Thorson, G.: Bottom communities (sublittoral or shallow shelf). Mem. geol. Soc. Am. 67, 461–534 (1957).Google Scholar
  22. Ushakov, P. V.: Polychaeta of the far eastern seas of the USSR. [In Russ.]. Opredeliteli po faune SSSR, Akad. nauk SSSR 56, 1–445 (1955). (Transl. from Russian. pp 1–419. Jerusalem: Israel Prog. Sci. Transl. 1965).Google Scholar
  23. Whittaker, R. H.: Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol. Rev. 42, 207–264 (1967).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. H. Nichols
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OceanographyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations