Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 45–77 | Cite as

Toward a semantic analysis of verb aspect and the English ‘imperfective’ progressive

  • David R. Dowty


Artificial Intelligence Semantic Analysis Computational Linguistic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bennett, Michael: 1974, Some Extensions of a Montague Fragment of English, UCLA Ph.D. dissertation, distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, Michael and Barbara Patree: ms. ‘Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English.’Google Scholar
  3. Dowty, David R.: 1972, Studies in the Logic of Verb Aspect and Time Reference in English, Univ. of Texas Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
  4. Dowty, David: 1976, ‘Montague Grammar and Lexical Decomposition of Causative Verbs’, in Partee, ed. Montague Grammar, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Goodman, Fred: 1973, ‘On the Semantics of Futurate Sentences’, Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics No. 16.Google Scholar
  6. Hoepelman, J. Ph: 1974, ‘Tense Logic and the Semantics of the Russian Aspects’, Theoretical Linguistics 1:1, 158–180.Google Scholar
  7. Lakoff, George: 1970, ‘Linguistics and Natural Logic’, Synthese 22, pp. 151–271.Google Scholar
  8. Lewis, David: 1973a, ‘Causation’, The Journal of Philosophy 80, 557–567.Google Scholar
  9. Lewis, David: 1973b, Counterfactuals, Cambridge: Harvard.Google Scholar
  10. Montague, Richard: 1960, ‘On the Nature of Certain Philosophical Entities’, The Monist 53, 159–194. (Reprinted in Formal Philosophy, ed. Thomason. New Haven: Yale University Press.)Google Scholar
  11. Montague, Richard: 1968, ‘Pragmatics’ in Klibansky, ed. Contemporary Philosophy: A Survey. Florence: La Nuova Editrice. (Reprinted in Formal Philosophy.)Google Scholar
  12. Montague, Richard: 1970, ‘Pragmatics and Intensional Logic’, Synthese 22, pp. 68–94. (Reprinted in Formal Philosophy)Google Scholar
  13. Montague, Richard: 1972, ‘On the Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, (Reprinted in Formal Philosophy.)Google Scholar
  14. Prince, Ellen: 1973, ‘Futurate Be-ing, or Why Yesterday morning, I was leaving tomorrow on the Midnight Special is OK’, Unpublished paper, read at the 1973 Summer Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
  15. Rescher, Nicholas and Alisdair, Urquhart: 1971, Temporal Logic, New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Ryle, Gilbert: 1949, The Concept of Mind. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
  17. Scott, Dana: 1970, ‘Advice on Modal Logic’, in K. Lambert, ed. Philosophical Problems in Logic, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  18. Tedeschi, Philip J: 1973, ‘Some suggestions for a semantic analysis of progressives’, University of Michigan Papers in Linguistics 1:2, 157–168.Google Scholar
  19. Thomason, Richmond: 1970, ‘Indeterministic Time and Truth Value Gaps’, Theoria 18:3, 264–281.Google Scholar
  20. Thomason, Richmond: 1974, ‘Deontic Logic as Founded on Tense Logic, Unpublished paper presented at the Temple University Conference on Deviant Semantics, December 1970.Google Scholar
  21. Vendler, Zeno: 1967, ‘Verbs and Times’, in Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Vetter, David: 1972, ‘Someone solves this problem tomorrow’, Linguistic Inquiry 4:1, 104–108.Google Scholar
  23. von Wright, G. H: 1968, An Essay in Deontic Logic and the General Theory of Action. Acta Philosophica Fennica 18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • David R. Dowty
    • 1
  1. 1.Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations