Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 45–77 | Cite as

Toward a semantic analysis of verb aspect and the English ‘imperfective’ progressive

  • David R. Dowty
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Bennett, Michael: 1974, Some Extensions of a Montague Fragment of English, UCLA Ph.D. dissertation, distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, Michael and Barbara Patree: ms. ‘Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English.’Google Scholar
  3. Dowty, David R.: 1972, Studies in the Logic of Verb Aspect and Time Reference in English, Univ. of Texas Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
  4. Dowty, David: 1976, ‘Montague Grammar and Lexical Decomposition of Causative Verbs’, in Partee, ed. Montague Grammar, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Goodman, Fred: 1973, ‘On the Semantics of Futurate Sentences’, Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics No. 16.Google Scholar
  6. Hoepelman, J. Ph: 1974, ‘Tense Logic and the Semantics of the Russian Aspects’, Theoretical Linguistics 1:1, 158–180.Google Scholar
  7. Lakoff, George: 1970, ‘Linguistics and Natural Logic’, Synthese 22, pp. 151–271.Google Scholar
  8. Lewis, David: 1973a, ‘Causation’, The Journal of Philosophy 80, 557–567.Google Scholar
  9. Lewis, David: 1973b, Counterfactuals, Cambridge: Harvard.Google Scholar
  10. Montague, Richard: 1960, ‘On the Nature of Certain Philosophical Entities’, The Monist 53, 159–194. (Reprinted in Formal Philosophy, ed. Thomason. New Haven: Yale University Press.)Google Scholar
  11. Montague, Richard: 1968, ‘Pragmatics’ in Klibansky, ed. Contemporary Philosophy: A Survey. Florence: La Nuova Editrice. (Reprinted in Formal Philosophy.)Google Scholar
  12. Montague, Richard: 1970, ‘Pragmatics and Intensional Logic’, Synthese 22, pp. 68–94. (Reprinted in Formal Philosophy)Google Scholar
  13. Montague, Richard: 1972, ‘On the Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, (Reprinted in Formal Philosophy.)Google Scholar
  14. Prince, Ellen: 1973, ‘Futurate Be-ing, or Why Yesterday morning, I was leaving tomorrow on the Midnight Special is OK’, Unpublished paper, read at the 1973 Summer Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
  15. Rescher, Nicholas and Alisdair, Urquhart: 1971, Temporal Logic, New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Ryle, Gilbert: 1949, The Concept of Mind. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
  17. Scott, Dana: 1970, ‘Advice on Modal Logic’, in K. Lambert, ed. Philosophical Problems in Logic, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  18. Tedeschi, Philip J: 1973, ‘Some suggestions for a semantic analysis of progressives’, University of Michigan Papers in Linguistics 1:2, 157–168.Google Scholar
  19. Thomason, Richmond: 1970, ‘Indeterministic Time and Truth Value Gaps’, Theoria 18:3, 264–281.Google Scholar
  20. Thomason, Richmond: 1974, ‘Deontic Logic as Founded on Tense Logic, Unpublished paper presented at the Temple University Conference on Deviant Semantics, December 1970.Google Scholar
  21. Vendler, Zeno: 1967, ‘Verbs and Times’, in Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Vetter, David: 1972, ‘Someone solves this problem tomorrow’, Linguistic Inquiry 4:1, 104–108.Google Scholar
  23. von Wright, G. H: 1968, An Essay in Deontic Logic and the General Theory of Action. Acta Philosophica Fennica 18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • David R. Dowty
    • 1
  1. 1.Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations