Microstructure and mechanical properties relations for green bodies compacted from spray dried granules
- 56 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
Alumina granules from three binder systems were spray dried and pressed into bars at varied pressure. Granules are classified as strong, medium and weak as to reflect the different amount of poly(vinyl-butyral) binder and liquid paraffin plasticizer used in the binder system. Mechanical properties of the pressed bars were obtained from a four-point bend test and microstructures were examined using scanning electron microscopy SEM. Strengths and fracture toughnesses are found to increase as a function of compaction pressure, while the calculated effective flaw size is independent of the compaction pressure for all three granule types. Microstructural examination of fracture surfaces revealed that samples compacted at high pressure exhibited more transgranular fracture than samples compacted at low pressure. Evidently, higher pressure had increased the intergranular fracture resistance which correspondingly increased the fracture toughness of the pressed bars. For bars pressed from granules, green body strengths and toughnesses are strongly dependent on the cohesion between pressed granules and not on the effective processing flaw size.
Keywords
Fracture Toughness Flaw Size Intergranular Fracture Green Body Liquid ParaffinPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.L. M. Sheppard, Bull. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 72 (1993) 28.Google Scholar
- 2.S. P. Timoshenko and G. M. Gere “Mechanics of materials” (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1972) p. 288.Google Scholar
- 3.JIS R-1601 and JIS R-1602, Japan Industrial Standards, (Japan Industrial Standards Association 36 1991) p. 252 and p. 254.Google Scholar
- 4.D. Broek “Elementary engineering fracture mechanics” 4th Edn (Martinus Nijhoff, New York, 1986) p. 201.Google Scholar
- 5.E. Klar and W. M. Shafer, in “Modern developments in powder metallurgy,” 9, edited by W. Leszynski (Metal Powder Industries Federation, Princeton, New Jersey, 1976) p. 91.Google Scholar
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.J. A. Lund, Int. J. Powder Technol. 18 (1982) 117.Google Scholar
- 9.A. G. Evans, B. J. Dalgleish, M. He and J. W. Hutchinson, Acta Metall. Mater. 37 (1989) 3249.Google Scholar
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.M. Abdel-Ghani, J. G. Petrie, J. P. K. Seville, R. Clift and M. J. Adams, Powder Technol. 68 (1991) 113.Google Scholar
- 15.M. J. Adams, J. Powder. Bulk Sol. Technol. 9 (1985) 15.Google Scholar
- 16.
- 17.Idem., Chem. Eng. Sci. 42 (1987) 667.Google Scholar