Marine Biology

, Volume 126, Issue 4, pp 585–590 | Cite as

Genetic relationships of pilchards (genus: Sardinops) with anti-tropical distributions

  • T. Okazaki
  • T. Kobayashi
  • Y. Uozumi
Article

Abstract

The pilchards (genus Sardinops), one of the major components of the world's harvest of fishes, is distributed sporadically in the temperate zone on a global scale. Mitochondrial DNA variation in 95 pilchards from nine worldwide localities in five current systems was examined using ten restriction enzymes. Although several opinions have been proposed on the global population structure of the genus Sardinops, our results clearly rejected the hypothesis of gene flow among geographically distant populations on a global scale. Results indicate that the Japanese pilchards and the Australian and South African pilchards were derived from the eastern Pacific populations, following the speciation of Sardinops in the Pacific, after the formation of the Isthmus of Panama. An intermixing of the northeastern and southeastern Pacific populations during the Pleistocene glacial maxima is suggested from their genetic affinities.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avise JC (1989) Gene trees and organismal histories: a phylogenetic approach to population biology. Evolution 43: 1192–1208Google Scholar
  2. Brown WM, George M Jr, Wilson AC (1979) Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc natn Acad Sci USA 76: 1967–1971Google Scholar
  3. CLIMAP Project Members (1976) The surface of the iceage Earth. Science, NY 191: 1131–1137Google Scholar
  4. Collette BB, Nauen CE (1983) Scombrids of the world. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  5. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN) (1995) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaskin DE (1982) The ecology of whales and dolphins. Heinemann, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Giuffra E, Bernatchez L, Guyomard R (1994) Mitochondrial control region and protein coding genes sequence variation among phenotypic forms of brown trout Salmo trutta from northern Italy. Molec Ecol 3: 161–171Google Scholar
  8. Hedgecock D, Hutchinson ES, Li G, Sly FL, Nelson K (1989) Genetic and morphometric variation in the Pacific sardine, Sardinops sagax caerulea: comparisons and contrasts with historical data and with variability in the northern anchovy, Engraulis mordax. Fish Bull US 87: 653–671Google Scholar
  9. Keigwin LD (1978) Pliocene closing of the Isthmus of Panama based on biostratigraphy evidence from nearby Pacific Ocean and Caribbean Sea cores. Geology (Boulder, Colorado) 6: 630–634Google Scholar
  10. Kenya VS (1982) New data on the migrations and distribution of Pacific sardines in the Northwest Pacific. Soviet J mar Biol 8: 41–48Google Scholar
  11. Kuroda K (1991) Studies on the recruitment process focusing on the early life history of the Japanese sardine, Sardinops melanostictus (Schlegel). Bull natn Res Inst Fish Sci 3: 25–278 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  12. Lansman RA, Shade RO, Shapira JF, Avise JC (1981) The use of restriction endonucleases to measure mitochondrial DNA sequence relatedness in natural populations. III. Techniques and potential applications. J Molec Evolut 17: 214–226Google Scholar
  13. Nakai Z (1952) On the fishery for “iwashi” (sardine, anchovy herring) and research of its resources in the Japanese waters. Spec Publs Tokai Fish Res Lab 1: 1–14Google Scholar
  14. Nei M, Li W-H (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc natn Acad Sci USA 76: 5269–5273Google Scholar
  15. Nei M, Tajima F (1981) DNA polymorphism detectable by restriction endonucleases. Genetics, NY 97: 145–163Google Scholar
  16. Ochiai A, Yamazaki S (1952) Studies on the sardine, Sardinops melanosticta (T. & S.) found in Wakasa Bay and its neighbouring sea. (2) A comparative study of the body form. In: Special Publication of the Japan Sea Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory, 3rd anniversary. Jap Sea reg Fish Res Lab, Nanao, Japan, pp 227–232 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  17. Parrish RH, Serra R, Grant WS (1989) The monotypic sardines, Sardina and Sardinops: their taxonomy, distribution, stock structure, and zoogeography. Can J Fish aquat Sciences 46: 2019–2036Google Scholar
  18. Palumbi SR, Martin A, Romano S, McMillan WO, Stice L, Grabowski G (1991) The simple fool's guide to PCR. Version 2. University of Hawii, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  19. Saiki RK, Gelfand DH, Stoffel S, Scharf SJ, Higuchi R, Horn GT, Mullis KB, Erlich HA (1988) Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostabile DNA polymerase. Science, NY 239: 487–491Google Scholar
  20. Saito T (1976) Geologic significance of coiling direction in planktonic Foraminifera, Pulleniatina. Geology (Boulder, Colorado) 4: 305–309Google Scholar
  21. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molec Biol Evolut 4: 406–425Google Scholar
  22. Spoel SV, Heyman RP (1983) A comparative atlas of zooplankton, biological patterns in the oceans. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  23. Sverdrup HU, Johnson MW, Fleming RH (1942) The oceans; their physics, chemistry, and general biology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  24. Thomas WK, Withler RE, Beckenbach AT (1986) Mitochondrial DNA analysis of Pacific salmonid evolution. Can J Zool 64: 1058–1064Google Scholar
  25. Ward RD, Woodwark M, Skibinski DOF (1994) A comparison of genetic diversity levels in marine, freshwater, and anadromous fishes, J Fish Biol 44: 213–232Google Scholar
  26. Whitehead PJ (1985) Clupeoid fishes of the world. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Okazaki
    • 1
  • T. Kobayashi
    • 1
  • Y. Uozumi
    • 2
  1. 1.National Research Institute of AquacultureTamakiJapan
  2. 2.National Research Institute of Far Seas FisheriesShimizu, ShizuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations