Marine Biology

, Volume 120, Issue 4, pp 627–638

Habitats and tidal accessibility of the marine foods of dabbling ducks and brant in Boundary Bay, British Columbia

  • J. R. Baldwin
  • J. R. Lovvorn
Article

Abstract

The role of birds in intertidal food webs is mediated by effects of tides on the habitat, distribution, and accessibility of food organisms. We studied effects of elevation, sediment characteristics, vegetation, and tidal cycles on waterfowl feeding and food organisms in Boundary Bay, British Columbia, Canada from September to March 1990–1992. Percent dry mass of esophageal contents was mainly Zostera japonica leaves (84%) for American wigeon (Anas americana Gmelin), and leaves of Z. japonica (57%) and Z. marina (41%) for brant (Branta bernicla L.). Northern pintails (A. acuta L.) and mallards (A. platyrhynchos L.) ate mostly the leaves, seeds, and rhizomes of Z. japonica (48 and 72%, respectively) and gastropods (12 and 28%). Green-winged teal (A. crecca L.) ate mainly amphipods (68%) and saltmarsh seeds (19%). The well-sorted fine sand (median 0.125 mm) to medium sand (0.25 mm), and the low organic carbon content (1.31±0.12% dry mass), did not appear to vary sufficiently along 2.1- and 2.6-km transects to affect macroinvertebrate distributions. Three habitat zones were recognized: (1) upper intertidal (sandflats); (2) mid-intertidal (largely monotypic Z. japonica); and (3) lower intertidal (mixed Z. japonica and Z. marina). These zones, although related to elevation, had greater influence on amphipod distributions than did elevation alone or detrital biomass. Biomass and numbers of most invertebrate foods of waterfowl were greatest in the eelgrass zones, with the upper elevational limit of Z. japonica occurring at about Mean Water Level (MWL). Accordingly, wigeon, pintails, and mallards fed mostly below MWL. Because of seasonal tidal cycles, daily accessibility of areas below MWL but within reach of surfacefeeding waterfowl decreased from a mean of 10.8 h in October to 9.6 h in December. In October only 10 d and <12 h available feeding time, whereas in December and January every day had <12 h available feeding time. Seasonal effects of tides on accessibility might limit sufficient feeding by some waterfowl species in intertidal areas, increasing their reliance on alternative feeding sites.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–265Google Scholar
  2. Ambrose WG (1986) Estimate of removal rate of Nereis virens (Polychaeta: Nereidae) from an intertidal mudflat by gulls (Larus spp.). Mar Biol 90:243–247Google Scholar
  3. Baird D, Evans PR, Milne H, Pienkowski MW (1985) Utilization by shorebirds of benthic invertebrate production in intertidal areas. Oceanogr mar Biol A Rev 23:573–597Google Scholar
  4. Baldwin JR (1993) Foraging ecology and movements of waterfowl in the Fraser Delta, British Columbia, and the Puget Trough. MS Thesis, University of Wyoming, LaramieGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldwin JR, Lovvorn JR (1994) Expansion of seagrass habitat by the exotic Zostera japonica, and its use by dabbling ducks and brant in Boundary Bay, British Columbia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 103: 119–127Google Scholar
  6. Bally R (1983) Factors affecting the distribution of organisms in the intertidal zones of sandy beaches. In: McLachlan A, Erasmus T (eds) Sandy beaches as ecosystems. Dr W Junk Publ, The Hague, pp 391–403Google Scholar
  7. Baretta-Becker JG, Stam A (1988) The construction of the epibenthic submodel. In: Baretta J, Ruardij P, de Wolf P (eds) Tidal flat estuaries. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 153–167Google Scholar
  8. Brennan LA, Buchanan JB, Herman SG, Johnson TM (1985) Interhabitat movements of wintering dunlins in western Washington. Murrelet 66:11–16Google Scholar
  9. Bryant DM, Leng J (1975) Feeding distribution and behaviour of shelduck in relation to food supply. Wildfowl 26:20–30Google Scholar
  10. Buchanan JB (1984) Sediment analysis. In: Holme NA, McIntyre AD (eds) Methods for the study of marine benthos. Blackwell Scientific Publishing, Oxford, pp 41–65Google Scholar
  11. Burger J, Howe MA, Hahn DC, Chase J (1977) Effects of tide cycles on habitat selection and habitat partitioning by migrating shorebirds. Auk 94:743–758Google Scholar
  12. Butler RW (ed) (1992) Abundance, distribution and conservation of birds in the vicinity of Boundary Bay, British Columbia. Tech Rep Ser No 155, Canadian Wildlife Service, Delta, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  13. Butler RW, Campbell RW (1987) The birds of the Fraser River Delta: populations, ecology and international significance. Can Wildl Serv Occ Pap No 65, Canadian Wildlife Service, Delta, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  14. Butler RW, Cannings RJ (1989) Distribution of birds in the intertidal portion of the Fraser River Delta, British Columbia. Can Wildl Serv Tech Rep Ser 93, Canadian Wildlife Service, Delta, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  15. Cantin M, Bedard J, Milne H (1974) The food and feeding of common eiders in the St. Lawrence estuary in summer. Can J Zool 52:319–334Google Scholar
  16. Connors PG, Myers JP, Connors CSW, Pitelka FA (1981) Interhabitat movements by sanderlings in relation to foraging profitability and the tidal cycle. Auk 98:49–64Google Scholar
  17. Couch AB (1966) Feeding ecology of four species of sandpipers in western Washington. MS Thesis, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  18. Eamer J (1985) Winter habitat for dabbling ducks on southeastern Vancouver Island, British Columbia. MS Thesis, University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  19. Evans PR (1979) Adaptations shown by foraging shorebirds to cyclical variations in the activity and availability of their intertidal invertebrate prey. In: Naylor E, Hartnoll RG (eds) Cyclic phenomena in marine plants and animals. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 357–366Google Scholar
  20. Folk RL (1974) Petrology of sedimentary rocks. Hemphill Publishing Company, Austin, TexasGoogle Scholar
  21. Forrester WD (1983) Canadian tidal manual. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canadian Hydrographic Service, Ottawa, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  22. Guillemette M, Ydenberg RC, Himmelman JH (1992) The role of energy intake rate in prey and habitat selection of common eiders Somateria mollissima in winter: a risk-sensitive interpretation. J Anim Ecol 61:599–610Google Scholar
  23. Hicklin PW, Smith PC (1984) Selection of foraging sites and invertebrate prey by migrant semipalmated sandpipers, Calidris pusilla (Pallas), in Minas Basin, Bay of Fundy. Can J Zool 62: 2201–2210Google Scholar
  24. Hirsch KV (1980) Winter ecology of sea ducks in the inland marine waters of Washington. MS Thesis, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  25. Karasov WH (1990) Digestion in birds: chemical and physiological determinants and ecological implications. Stud avian Biol 13: 391–415Google Scholar
  26. Levings CD (1980) Consequences of training walls and jetties for aquatic habitats at two British Columbia estuaries. Coastal Engin 4:111–136Google Scholar
  27. Levings CD, Coustalin J-B (1975) Zonation of intertidal biomass and related benthic data from Sturgeon and Roberts Banks, Fraser River estuary, British Columbia. Can fish mar Serv Tech Rep 468, West Vancouver, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  28. Madsen J (1988) Autumn feeding ecology of herbivorous wildfowl in the Danish Wadden Sea, and impacts of food supplies and shooting on movements. Dan Rev Game Biol 13Google Scholar
  29. Mayhew RW (1988) The daily energy intake of European wigeon in winter. Ornis scand 19:217–223Google Scholar
  30. McKelvey RW, Summers KR (1990) Aerial surveys of migratory birds on the Fraser River Delta, 1989–90. Can Wildl Serv Tech Rep Ser 109, Delta, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  31. Michot TC, Moser EB, Norling W (1994) Effects of weather and tides on feeding and flock positions of wintering redheads in Chandeleur Sound, Louisiana. Hydrobiologia 279/280:263–278Google Scholar
  32. Miller PA (1985) The role of habitat heterogeneity in the community dynamics of an eelgrass-associated assemblage of gammarid amphipods. MS Thesis, University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  33. Nilsson L (1972) Habitat selection, food choice, and feeding habits of diving ducks in coastal waters of south Sweden during the non-breeding season. Ornis scand 3:55–78Google Scholar
  34. Orth RJ, Heck KL, van Montfrans J (1984) Faunal communities in seagrass beds: a review of the influence of plant structure and prey characteristics on predator-prey relationships. Estuaries 7: 339–350Google Scholar
  35. Otte G, Levings CD (1975) Distribution of macroinvertebrate communites on a mud flat influenced by sewage, Fraser River estuary, British Columbia. Can fish mar Serv Tech Rep 476, West Vancouver, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  36. Pamatmat MM (1968) Ecology and metabolism of a benthic community on an intertidal sandlfat. Int Revue ges Hydrobiol 53: 211–298Google Scholar
  37. Pehrsson O (1976) Food and feeding grounds of the goldeneye Bucephala clangula (L.) on the Swedish coast. Ornis scand 7:91–112Google Scholar
  38. Schneider DC, Harrington BA (1981) Timing of shorebird migration in relation to prey depletion. Auk 98:801–811Google Scholar
  39. Smith JE (1980) Seasonality, spatial dispersion patterns and migration of benthic invertebrates in an intertidal marsh-sandflat system of Puget Sound, Washington, and their relation to water-fowl foraging and the feeding ecology of staghorn sculpin, Leptocottus armatus. PhD Thesis, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  40. Stott RS, Olson DP (1973) Food-habitat relationship of sea ducks on the New Hampshire coastline. Ecology 54:996–1007Google Scholar
  41. Swanson GA, Bartonek JC (1970) Bias associated with food analysis in gizzards of blue-winged teal. J Wildl Mgmt 34:739–746Google Scholar
  42. Swanson GA, Krapu GL, Bartonek JC, Serie JR, Johnson DH (1974) Advantages in mathematically weighting waterfowl food habits data. J Wildl Mgmt 38:302–307Google Scholar
  43. Swinbanks DD (1982) Intertidal exposure zones: a way to subdivide the shore. J exp mar Biol Ecol 62:69–86Google Scholar
  44. Swinbanks DD, Murray JW (1981) Biosedimentological zonation of Boundary Bay tidal flats, Fraser River Delta, British Columbia. Sedimetology 28:201–237Google Scholar
  45. Vermeer K, Butler RW (1989) The ecology and status of marine and shoreline birds in the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia. Spec Publ Can Wildl Serv, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  46. Vermeer K, Levings CD (1977) Populations, biomass and food habits of ducks on the Fraser Delta intertidal area, British Columbia. Wildfowl 28:49–60Google Scholar
  47. Waldichuk M (1957) Physical oceanography of the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia. J Fish Res Bd Can 14:321–486Google Scholar
  48. Wilkins EW (1982) Waterfowl utilization of a submerged vegetation (Zostera marina and Ruppia maritima) bed in the lower Chesapeake Bay. MA Thesis, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  49. Wolff WJ, van Haperen AMM, Sandee AJJ, Baptist HJM, Saeijs HLF (1975) The trophic role of birds in the Grevelingen estuary, the Netherlands, as compared to their role in the saline lake Grevelingen. Eur mar Biol Symp 10:673–689Google Scholar
  50. Wolff WJ, de Wolf L (1977) Biomass and production of zoobenthos in the Grevelingen estuary, The Netherlands. Estuar cstl Shelf Sci 5:1–24Google Scholar
  51. Zwarts L (1976) Density-related processes in feeding dispersion and feeding activity of teal (Anas crecca). Ardea 64:192–209Google Scholar
  52. Zwarts L, Blomert A, Wanink JH (1992) Annual and seasonal variation in the food supply harvestable by knot Calidris canutus staging in the Wadden Sea in late ssummer. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 83: 129–139Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. R. Baldwin
    • 1
  • J. R. Lovvorn
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Zoology and PhysiologyUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations