Marine Biology

, Volume 120, Issue 4, pp 609–613 | Cite as

Karotypic characterization of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) with conventional, fluorochrome and restriction endonuclease-banding techniques

  • C. Bouza
  • L. Sanchez
  • P. Martínez
Article

Abstract

A karyotypic analysis was carried out in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) using conventional banding techniques, fluorochromes and restriction endonucleasebanding. The standard karyotype of turbot is 2n=44 chromosomes, with 48 chromosome arms. Nucleolar organizer regions, which were localized in the short arm of Chromosome Pair No. 3, showed C-and chromomycin A3-positive staining. C-bands were mainly located at the centromeres, but were also present in some interstitial and telomeric locations. No differences were revealed among constitutive heterochromatin bands after treatment of fixed chromosomes with fluorochrome staining and restriction endonucleases. Digestion with DdeI restriction enzyme produced a pattern of interstitial banding which suggested some degree of differentiation along the chromosome arms in turbot. Neither variation in chromosome number of arm number nor polymorphism in nucleolar organizer regions was revealed in the turbot analyzed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almeida-Toledo LF, Foresti F, Toledo FSA (1981) Constitutive heterochromatin and nucleolus organizer region in knifefish Apteronotus albifrons (Pisces, Apteronotidae). Experientia 37:953–954Google Scholar
  2. Amemiya CT, Bickham JW, Gold JR (1984) A cell culture technique for chromosome preparation in cyprinid fishes. Copeia 1984:232–235Google Scholar
  3. Barker CJ (1972) A method for the display of chromosomes of plaice, Pleuronectes platessa, and other marine fishes. Copeia 1972: 365–368Google Scholar
  4. Blanquer A, Alayse JP, Berrada-Rkhami O, Berrebi P (1992) Allozyme variation in turbot (Psetta maxima) and brill (Scophthalmus rhombus) (Osteichthyes, Pleuronectiformes, Scophthalmidae) throughout their range in Europe. J Fish Biol 41:725–736Google Scholar
  5. Brulé T (1989) Analysis of the enzyme polymorphism in a plaice, Pleuronectes platessa L., population from the north-west coast of Brittany, France. J Fish Biol 35:607–620Google Scholar
  6. Fan Z, Fox DP (1990) A new method for fish chromosome preparation. J Fish Biol 37:553–561Google Scholar
  7. Fan Z, Fox DP (1991) Robertsonian polymorphism in plaice, Pleuronectes platessa L., and cod, Gadus morhua L. (Pisces Pleuronectiformes and Gadiformes). J Fish Biol 38:635–640Google Scholar
  8. Fukuoka H, Niiyama H (1970) Notes on the somatic chromosomes of ten species of pleuronected fishes. Chromosome Inf Serv 11:18–19Google Scholar
  9. Gold JR (1984) Silver-staining and heteromorphism of chromosomal nucleolus organizer regions in North American cyprinid fishes. Copeia 1984:133–139Google Scholar
  10. Gold JR, Li YC, Shipley NS, Powers PK (1990) Improved methods for working with fish chromosomes with a review of metaphase chromosome banding. J Fish Biol 37:563–575Google Scholar
  11. Hartley SE (1987) The chromosomes of salmonid fishes. Biol Rev 62:197–214Google Scholar
  12. Hartley SE, Horne MT (1985) Cytogenetic techniques in fish genetics. J Fish Biol 26:575–582Google Scholar
  13. Howell WM, Black A (1980) Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a l-step method. Experientia 36:1014–1015Google Scholar
  14. Tvanov VN (1969) The chromosomes of the Black Sea flatfish Rhombus maeticus Pallas. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR (Biol Sciences) 187:507–509 [Transl. Plenum Publishing Corp, Consultants Bureau, New York 1987]Google Scholar
  15. John B, King M, Schweizer D, Mendelak D (1985) Equilocality of heterochromatin distribution and heterochromatin heterogeneity in acridic grasshoppers. Chromosoma 88:57–68Google Scholar
  16. Kikuno T, Ojima Y, Yamashita N (1986) Chromosomes of flounder, Paralichthys olvacceus. Proc Japan Acad 62:194–196Google Scholar
  17. LeGrande WH (1975) Karyology of six species of Louisiana flatfishes (Pleuronectiformes: Osteichthyes). Copeia 1975:516–522Google Scholar
  18. Martínez P, Viñas A, Bouza C, Arias J, Amaro R, Sánchez L (1991) Cytogenetical characterization of hatchery stocks and natural populations of sea and trown trout from Northwestern Spain. Heredity, Lond 66:9–17Google Scholar
  19. Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 106:283–292Google Scholar
  20. Ohno S (1970) The enormous diversity in genome sizes of fishes as a reflection of nature's extensive experiments with gene duplication. Am Fish Soc 99:120–130Google Scholar
  21. Ohno S, Atkin NB (1966) Comparative DNA values and chromosome some complements of species of fishes. Chromosoma 18:455–466Google Scholar
  22. Patro R, Prasad PG (1981) Chromosomal studies in five Indian flatfishes. Copeia 1981:498–505Google Scholar
  23. Phillips R, Ihsen PE (1985) Chromosome banding in salmonid fish: nucleolar organizer regions in Salmo and Salvelinus. Can J Genet Cytol 27:433–440Google Scholar
  24. Rocchi A (1982) On the heterogeneity of heterochromatin. Caryologia 35:169–189Google Scholar
  25. Sánchez L, Martínez P, Bouza C, Viñas A (1991) Chromosomal heterochromatin differentiation in Salmo trutto with restriction enzymes. Heredity, Lond 66:241–249Google Scholar
  26. Sánchez L, Martínez P, Viñas A, Bouza C (1990) Analysis of the structure and variability of nucleolar organizer regions of Salmotrutta by C-, Ag-, and restriction endonuclease banding. Cytogenet Cell Genet 54:6–9Google Scholar
  27. Schweizer D (1976) Reverse fluorescent chromosome banding with chromomycin and DAPI. Chromosoma 58:57–68Google Scholar
  28. Smith PJ, Fujio Y (1982) Genetic variation in marine teleosts: high variability in habitat specialists and low variability in habitat generalists. Mar Biol 69:7–20Google Scholar
  29. Thorgaard GH, Allen SK (1987) Chromosome manipulation and markers in fishery management. In: Ryman N, Utter F (eds) Population genetics and fishery management. Washington University Press, Seattle and London, pp 319–331Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Bouza
    • 1
  • L. Sanchez
    • 1
  • P. Martínez
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Biología Fundamental, Area de Genética, Facultad de VeterinariaUniversidad de Santiago de CompostelaLugoSpain

Personalised recommendations