Marine Biology

, Volume 116, Issue 2, pp 319–327 | Cite as

Effects of ambient levels of solar ultraviolet radiation on zooxanthellae and photosynthesis of the reef coral Montipora verrucosa

  • R. A. KinzieIII


Paired flat plates of the hermatypic coral Montipora verrucosa from Kaneohe Bay, Oahu, Hawaii, were acclimated to photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) only and to full sunlight (PAR+UV) for several weeks in the summer of 1990. After the acclimation period, photosynthesis, both in PAR-only and PAR+UV as well as dark respiration were measured. Levels of the UV-absorbing compounds, “S320”, density of zooxanthellae, and chlorophyll a concentration were determined. Corals acclimated in PAR+UV had higher levels of the UV-protective compounds and lower areal zooxanthellae densities than corals acclimated in PAR-only. Chlorophyll a per unit volume of coral host and per algal cell did not differ between corals from the two acclimation treatments. Corals acclimated to PAR+UV displayed higher photosynthesis in full sunlight than corals acclimated to PAR-only, but when photosynthesis was measured in the light regime to which the corals had been acclimated, there were no differences in photosynthesis. Dark respiration was the same for corals from the two acclimation treatments regardless of the light quality immediately preceding the dark period.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Calkins, J. (ed.) (1982) The role of solar ultraviolet radiation in marine ecosystems. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Dunlap, W. C., Chalker, B. E. (1986). Identification and quantification of near UV absorbing compounds (S320) in a hermatypic scleractinian. Coral Reefs 5: 155–159Google Scholar
  3. Dunlap, W. C., Chalker, B. E., Oliver, K. L. (1986). Bathymetric adaptations of reef-building corals at Davies Reef, Great Barrier Reef, Australia. III. UV-B absorbing compounds. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 104: 239–248Google Scholar
  4. Dykens, J. A., Shick, J. M. (1982). Oxygen production by endosymbiotic algae controls superoxide dismutase activity in the animal host. Nature, Lond. 297: 579–580Google Scholar
  5. Dykens, J. A., Shick, J. M. (1984). Photobiology of the symbiotic sea anemone, Anthopleura elegantissima: defenses against photodynamic effects, and seasonal photoacclimatization. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 167: 683–697Google Scholar
  6. Falkowski, P. G., Jokiel, P. L., Kinzie, III, R. A. (1990). Irradiance and corals. In: Dubinsky, Z. (ed.) Ecosystems of the world. Vol. 25. Coral reefs. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 89–107Google Scholar
  7. Fleischmann, E. M. (1989). The measurement and penetration of ultraviolet radiation into tropical marine water. Limnol. Oceanogr. 34: 1623–1629Google Scholar
  8. Glynn, P. W. (1993). Coral reef bleaching: ecological perspectives. Coral Reefs (in press)Google Scholar
  9. Halldal, P. (1968). Photosynthetic capacities and photosynthetic action spectra of endozoic algae of the massive coral Favia. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 134: 411–424Google Scholar
  10. Harm, W. (1980). Biological effects of ultraviolet radiation. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Hunter, C. L. (1985). Assessment of clonal diversity and population structure of Porites compressa (Cnidaria, Scleractinia). Proc. 5th int. coral Reef Congr. 6: 69–74. [Gabrié, C. et al. (eds.) Antenne Museum-EPHE, Moorea, French Polynesia]Google Scholar
  12. Jaubert, J. (1977). Light, metabolism and growth forms of the hermatypic scleractinian coral Synaraea convexa Verrill in the lagoon of Moorea (French Polynesia). Proc. 3rd int. coral Reef Symp. 1: 484–488 [Taylor, D. L. (ed.) Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami]Google Scholar
  13. Jerlov, N. G. (1950). Ultra-violet radiation in the sea. Nature, Lond. 116: 111–112Google Scholar
  14. Jerlov, N. G. (1968). Optical oceanography. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  15. Jokiel, P. L. (1980). Solar ultraviolet radiation and coral reef epifauna. Science, N.Y. 207: 1069–1071Google Scholar
  16. Jokiel, P. L., York, R. H. (1982). Solar ultraviolet photobiology of the reef coral Pocillopora damicornis. Bull. mar. Sci. 32: 301–315Google Scholar
  17. Jokiel, P. L., York, R. H. (1984). Importance of ultraviolet radiation in photoinhibition of microalgal growth. Limnol Oceanogr. 29: 192–199Google Scholar
  18. Karentz, D., (1991). Ecological considerations of Antarctic Zone depletion. Antarctic Sci. 3: 3–11Google Scholar
  19. Karentz, D., Lutze, L. H. (1990). Evaluation of biologically harmful ultraviolet radiation in Antarctica with a biological dosimeter designed for aquatic environments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35: 549–561Google Scholar
  20. Karentz, D., McEuen, E. S., Land, M. C., Dunlap, W. C. (1991). Survey of mycosporine-like amino acid compounds in Antarctic marine organisms: potential protection from ultraviolet exposure. Mar. Biol. 108: 157–166Google Scholar
  21. Kawaguti, S. (1969). Effect of the green fluorescent pigment on the productivity of reef corals. Micronesica 5: p. 313 (Abstr.)Google Scholar
  22. Kawaguti, S. (1973). Electron microscopy on symbiotic alagae in coral reefs. Contr. Seto mar. biol. Lab. 575: 779–783Google Scholar
  23. Kerr, R. A. (1992). New assaults seen on earth's ozone shield. Science, N.Y. 255: 797–798Google Scholar
  24. Lesser, M. P., Shick, J. M. (1989). Effects of irradiance and ultraviolet radiation on photoadaptation in the zooxanthellae of Aiptasia pallida: primary production, photoinhibition, and enzymic defenses against oxygen toxicity. Mar. Biol. 102: 243–255Google Scholar
  25. Lesser, M. P., Stochaj, W. R., Tapley, D. W., Shick, J. M. (1990). Physiological mechanisms of bleaching in coral reef anthozoans: effects of irradiance, ultraviolet radiation and temperature on the activities of protective enzymes against active oxygen. Coral Reefs. 8: 225–232Google Scholar
  26. Logan, A., Halcrow, K., Tomascik, T. (1990). UV excitation in polyp tissue of certain scleractinian corals from Barbados and Bermuda. Bull. mar. Sci. 46: 807–813Google Scholar
  27. Maragos, J. E. (1972) A study of the ecology of Hawaiian reef corals. Ph. D. dissertation. University of Hawaii, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  28. Muscatine, L. (1990). The role of symbiotic algae in carbon and energy flux in reef corals. In: Dubinsky, Z. (ed.) Ecosystems of the world. Vol. 25. Coral reefs. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 75–87Google Scholar
  29. Scelfo, G. (1985). The effects of visible and ultraviolet solar radiation on a UV-absorbing compound and chlorophyll a in a Hawaiian zoanthid. Proc. 5th coral Reef Congr. 6: 107–112. [Gabrié C. et al. (eds.) Antenne Museum-EPHE, Moorea, French Polynesia]Google Scholar
  30. Shick, J. M., Lesser, M. P., Stochaj, W. R. (1991). Ultraviolet radiation and photooxidative stress in zooxanthellate anthozoa: the sea anemone Phyllodiscus semoni and the octocoral Clavularia sp. Symbiosis 10: 145–173Google Scholar
  31. Shibata, K. (1969). Pigments and a UV-absorbing substance in corals and bluegreen algae living in the Great Barrier Reef. Pl. Cell Pysiol., Tokyo 10: 325–335Google Scholar
  32. Siebeck, O. (1988). Experimental investigation of UV tolerance in hermatypic corals (scleractinia). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 43: 95–103Google Scholar
  33. Sisson, W. B. (1986). Effects of UV-B radiation on photosynthesis. In: Worrest, R. C., Caldwell, M. M. (eds.) Stratospheric ozone reduction, solar ultraviolet radiation and plant life. Springer-Verlag. New York, p. 161–169Google Scholar
  34. Smith, R. C., Baker, K. S. (1979). Penetration of UV-B and biologically effective dose rate in natural waters. Photochem. Photobiol. 29: 311–323Google Scholar
  35. Tevini, M., Teramura, A. H. (1989). UV-B effects on terrestrial plants. Photochem. Photobiol. 50: 479–487Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. A. KinzieIII
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Zoology DepartmentUniversity of HawaiiHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.Hawaii Institute of Marine BiologyKaneoheUSA

Personalised recommendations