Marine Biology

, Volume 115, Issue 3, pp 363–372

Photosynthetic and optical properties of the marine chlorophyte Dunaliella tertiolecta grown under fluctuating light caused by surface-wave focusing

  • D. Stramski
  • G. Rosenberg
  • L. Legendre
Article

Abstract

Photosynthetic and optical properties of the marine chlorophyte Dunaliella tertiolecta Butcher were studied in response to irradiance fluctuations caused by surface-wave focusing. The experimental conditions simulated the prominent features of the light field (high average irradiance, spectral composition and statistical properties) in the uppermost few meters of the water column under sunny surface conditions. The properties of algae grown under high-frequency fluctuations were compared with control cells grown under constant light at the same average irradiance (∼800 μmol quantam-2s-1). No significant differences were found for a number of parameters, including growth rate, cellular chlorophyll a and pigment ratios, photosynthetic unit size and density of Photosystem I reaction centers, the rate of photosynthesis at the growth irradiance, dark respiration, and in vivo fluorescence of chlorophyll a per cell. Photosynthetic parameters were not affected by whether the incident light for oxygen exchange measurements was fluctuating or constant. This was the case whether the cells had been previously acclimated to either fluctuating or constant irradiance. Such a photosynthetic response indicates that cells are accomplishing a time integration of the fluctuating light. In addition, although D. tertiolecta is capable of dramatically changing its optical properties in response to low or high growth irradiance levels, the refractive index of the cells, the efficiency factors for light absorption and scattering by individual cells, and chlorophyll-specific absorption and scattering coefficients of cell suspensions, were all very similar under high irradiance, whether or not wave focusing was present.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Ackleson, S. G., Spinrad, R. W. (1988). Size and refractive index of individual marine particulates: a flow cytometric approach. Appl. Optics 27: 1270–1277Google Scholar
  2. Berner, T., Dubinsky, Z., Wyman, K., Falkowski, P. G. (1989). Photoadaptation and the “package” effect in Dunaliella tertiolecta (Chlorophyceae). J. Phycol. 25: 70–78Google Scholar
  3. Bohren, C. F., Huffman, D. R. (1983) Absorption and scattering of light by small particles. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bricaud, A., Morel, A. (1986). Light attenuation and scattering by phytoplanktonic cells: a theoretical modeling. Appl. Optics 25: 571–580Google Scholar
  5. Bricaud, A., Morel, A., Prieur, L. (1983). Optical efficiency factors of some phytoplankters. Limnol. Oceanogr. 28: 816–832Google Scholar
  6. Davies, B. H. (1976) Carotenoids. In: Goodwin, T. W. (ed.) Chemistry and biochemistry of plant pigments. Vol. 2. Academic Press, London p. 38–166Google Scholar
  7. Davies-Cooley, R. J., Pridmore, R. D., Hewitt, J. E. (1986). Optical properties of some freshwater phytoplanktonic algae. Hydrobiologia 133: 165–178Google Scholar
  8. Dera, J., Hapter, R., Malewicz, B. (1975). Fluctuation of light in the euphotic zone and its influence on primary production. Merentutkimuslait. Julk. 239: 351–364Google Scholar
  9. Dromgoole, F. I. (1987). Photosynthesis of marine algae in fluctuating light. I. Adjustment of rate in constant and fluctuating light regimes. Funct. Ecol. 1: 377–386Google Scholar
  10. Dromgoole, F. I. (1988). Light fluctuations and the photosynthesis of marine algae. II. Photosynthetic response to frequency, phase ratio and amplitude. Funct. Ecol. 2: 211–219Google Scholar
  11. Duysens, L. N. M. (1956). The flattening of the absorption spectrum of suspensions as compared to that of solutions. Biochim. biophys. Acta 19: 1–12Google Scholar
  12. Falkowski, P. G. (1984a). Physiological responses of phytoplankton to natural light regimes. J. Plankton Res. 6: 295–307Google Scholar
  13. Falkowski, P. G.,(1984b). Kinetics of adaptation to irradiance in Dunaliella tertiolecta. Photosynthetica 18: 62–68Google Scholar
  14. Falkowski, P. G., Owens, T. G. (1980). Light-shade adaptation: two strategies in marine phytoplankton. Pl. Physiol. 66: 592–595Google Scholar
  15. Fréchette, M., Legendre, L. (1978). Photosynthèse phytoplanctonique: réponse à un stimulus simple, imitant les variations rapides de la lumière engendrées par les vagues. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 32: 15–25Google Scholar
  16. Gallegos, C. L., Platt, T. (1982). Phytoplankton production and water motion in surface mixed layers. Deep-Sea Res. 29: 65–76Google Scholar
  17. Gaudillère, J. P. (1977). Effect of periodic oscillations of artificial light emission on photosynthetic activity. Physiologia Pl. 41: 95–98Google Scholar
  18. Geider, R. J., Osborne, B. A. (1987). Light absorption by a marine diatom: experimental observations and theoretical calculations of the package effect in a small Thalassiosira species. Mar. Biol. 96: 299–308Google Scholar
  19. Greene, R. M., Gerard, V. A. (1990). Effects of high-frequency light fluctuations on growth and photoacclimation of the red alga Chondrus crispus. Mar. Biol. 105: 337–344Google Scholar
  20. Gross, L. J. (1982). Photosynthetic dynamics in varying light environments: a model and its application to whole leaf carbon gain. Ecology 63: 84–93Google Scholar
  21. Guillard, R. R. L., Ryther, J.H. (1962). Studies of marine planktonic diatoms Cyclotella nana (Hustedt) and Detonula confervacea (Cleve) Grant. Can. J. Microbiol. 8: 229–239Google Scholar
  22. Hasle, G. R. (1978). The inverted-microscope method. In: Sournia, A. (ed.) Phytoplankton manual. UNESCO, Paris, p. 88–96Google Scholar
  23. Jeffrey, S. W., Humphrey, G. W. (1975). New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophylls a, b, c 1, and c 2 in higher plants, algae and natural phytoplankton. Biochem. Physiol. Pfl. 467: 191–194Google Scholar
  24. Kirk, J. T. O., Allen, R. L. (1965). Dependence of chloroplast pigment synthesis on protein synthesis: effect of actidione. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 21: 523–530Google Scholar
  25. Legendre, L., Rochet, M., Demers, S. (1986). Sea-ice microalgae to test the hypothesis of photosynthetic adaptation to high frequency light fluctuations. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 97: 321–326Google Scholar
  26. Lund, J. W. G., Kipling, C., Lecren, E. D. (1958). The inverted microscope method of estimating algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimation by counting. Hydrobiologia 11: 143–170Google Scholar
  27. Marra, J. (1980). Vertical mixing and primary production. In: Falkowski, P. G. (ed.) Primary productivity in the sea. Plenum Press, New York, p. 121–137Google Scholar
  28. McCree, K. J., Loomis, R. S. (1969). Photosynthesis in fluctuating light. Ecology 50: 422–428Google Scholar
  29. Morel, A. (1987). Chlorophyll-specific scattering coefficient of phytoplankton. A simplified theoretical approach. Deep-Sea Res. 34: 1093–1105Google Scholar
  30. Morel, A., Bricaud, A. (1981). Theoretical results concerning light absorption in a discrete medium, and application to specific absorption of phytoplankton. Deep-Sea Res. 28: 1375–1393Google Scholar
  31. Morel, A., Bricaud, A. (1986). Inherent optical properties of algal cells including picoplankton: theoretical and experimental results. Can. Bull. Fish. aquat. Sciences 214: 521–559Google Scholar
  32. Perry, M. J., Talbot, M. C., Alberte, R. S. (1981). Photoadaptation in marine phytoplankton: response of the photosynthetic unit. Mar. Biol. 62: 91–101Google Scholar
  33. Phillips, J. N., Jr., Myers, J. (1954). Growth rate of Chlorella in flashing light. Pl. Physiol. 29: 152–161Google Scholar
  34. Quéguiner, B., Legendre, L. (1986). Phytoplankton photosynthetic adaptation to high frequency light fluctuations simulating those induced by sea surface waves. Mar. Biol. 90: 483–491Google Scholar
  35. Richardson, K., Beardall, J., Raven, J. A. (1983). Adaptation of unicellular algae to irradiance: an analysis of strategies. New Phytol. 93: 157–191Google Scholar
  36. Stramski, D., Legendre, L. (1992). Laboratory simulation of light-focusing by water-surface waves. Mar. Biol. 114: 341–348Google Scholar
  37. Stramski, D., Morel, A. (1990). Optical properties of photosynthetic picoplankton in different physiological states as affected by growth irradiance. Deep-Sea Res. 37: 245–266Google Scholar
  38. Stramski, D., Morel, A., Bricaud, A. (1988). Modeling the light attenuation and scattering by spherical phytoplanktonic cells: a retrieval of the bulk refractive index. Appl. Optics 27: 3954–3957Google Scholar
  39. Sukenik, A., Bennett, J., Falkowski, P. G. (1987). Light-saturated photosynthesis—limitation by electron transport or carbon fixation? Biochim. biophys. Acta 891: 205–215Google Scholar
  40. Thornley, J. M. H. (1974). Light fluctuations and photosynthesis. Ann. Bot. 38: 363–373Google Scholar
  41. Van de Hulst, H. C. (1957). Light scattering by small particles. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Walsh, P., Legendre, L. (1982). Effets des fluctuations rapides de la lumière sur la photosynthèse du phytoplancton. J. Plankton Res. 4: 313–327Google Scholar
  43. Walsh, P., Legendre, L. (1983). Photosynthesis of natural phytoplankton under high frequency light fluctuations simulating those induced by sea surface waves. Limnol. Oceanogr. 28: 688–697Google Scholar
  44. Walsh, P., Legendre, L. (1988). Photosynthetic responses of the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum to high frequency light fluctuations simulating those induced by sea surface waves. J. Plankton Res. 10: 1077–1082Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Stramski
    • 1
  • G. Rosenberg
    • 1
  • L. Legendre
    • 1
  1. 1.Département de BiologieUniversité Laval, GIROQQuébecCanada
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Southern California, University ParkLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.American Association for the Advancement of ScienceWashington, D.C.USA

Personalised recommendations