Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 120, Issue 2, pp 273–277 | Cite as

Biomass measurements and weight-to-weight conversion factors: a comparison of methods applied to the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis

  • P. Palmerini
  • C. N. Bianchi
Article

Abstract

Wet weight to ash-free dry weight conversion factors were calculated for the bivalve Mytilus galloprovincialis Lamarck; specimens were collected in November 1989 in the Magra Estuary (eastern Ligurian Sea, Italy). Ash-free dry weight was determined by four different methods: (A) mechanical separation of shell and body; (B) shell dissolution with HCl; (C) dissolution of organic matter with NaClO; (D) incineration of the whole organism. The results obtained by these four methods were significantly different, indicating that caution is necessary when comparing biomass data obtained by different methods. Incineration and decalcification with HCl seem to be the best procedures: they not only combine accuracy with speed, but are also the most universally applicable, being equally suitable for soft-bodied or hard-bodied organisms. Mechanical separation can lead to an underestimation of the biomass, whereas treatment with NaClO can lead to its overestimation. However, no method can be considered the best in absolute terms, the final choice depending on the particular weight measurement required (e.g. shell-free dry weight) and the nature of the organism concerned (e.g. an organism with a large carbonate content).

Keywords

Biomass Bivalve Conversion Factor Incineration NaClO 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banse K, Mosher S (1980) Adult body mass and annual production/biomass relationship of field populations. Ecol Monogr 50: 355–379Google Scholar
  2. Boudreau PR, Dickie LM (1992) Biomass spectra of aquatic ecosystems in relation to fisheries yield. Can J Fish aquat Sciences 49: 1528–1538Google Scholar
  3. Brey T (1990) Estimating productivity of macrobenthic invertebrates from biomass and mean individual weight. Meeresforsch Rep mar Res 32: 329–343 (Ber dt wiss Kommn Meeresforsch)Google Scholar
  4. Brotskaja VA, Zenkevich LA (1939) Quantitative evaluation of the bottom fauna in the Barents Sea. Summary. Trudy vses nauchnoissled Inst morsk ryb Khoz Okeanogr 4: 99–126Google Scholar
  5. Buffoni G, Bianchi GN, Delfanti R, Di Cola G, Morri C, Niccolai I, Peroni C (1990) Modello di reti trofiche in biocenosi bentiche. Applicazione a biocenosi del golfo di Gaeta. Atti Congr Ass ital Oceanol Limnol 8: 227–251 [Bregant D, Fanzutti GP (eds) A.I.O.L., Genova]Google Scholar
  6. Castric-Fey A, Chassé C (1991) Factorial analysis in the ecology of rocky subtidal areas near Brest (West Brittany, France). J mar biol Ass UK 71: 515–536Google Scholar
  7. Crisp DJ (1984) Energy flow measurements. In: Holme NA, McIntyre AD (eds) Methods for the study of marine benthos. Blackwell Scientific. Oxford, pp 284–372Google Scholar
  8. Edgar GJ (1990) The use of the size structure of benthic macrofaunal communities to estimate faunal biomass and secondary production. J exp mar Biol Ecol 137: 195–214Google Scholar
  9. Giese AC (1967) Some methods for study of the biochemical constitution of marine invertebrates. Oceanogr mar Biol A Rev 5: 159–186Google Scholar
  10. Gilat E (1969) Study of an ecosystem in the coastal waters of the Ligurian Sea, III. Macrobenthic communities. Bull Inst océanogr Monaco 69 (1396): 1–76Google Scholar
  11. Grove EL, Jones RA, Mathews W (1961) The loss of sodium and potassium during the dry ashing of animal tissue. Analyt Biochem 2: 221–230Google Scholar
  12. Lappalainen A, Kangas P (1975) Littoral benthos of the Northern Baltic Sea. II. Interrelationship of wet, dry and ash-free dry weight of macrofauna in the Tvarminne area. Int Revue ges Hydrobiol 60: 297–312Google Scholar
  13. Lie U (1968) A quantitative study of benthic infauna in Puget Sound, Washington, USA, in 1963–1964. FiskDir Skr (Ser Havunders) 14: 229–556Google Scholar
  14. Martinengo JR (1984) Relaciones entre unidades de volumen y unidades de biomasa en distintas especies de algas bentónicas. Aplicación a evaluaciones de biomasa del fitobenthos. Oecologia aquat 7: 37–42Google Scholar
  15. Morri C, Castelli A, Diviacco G, Mori M, Bianchi CN (1990) Zonazione di comunità bentiche lungo l'estuario della Magra (Mar Ligure orientale). Memorie Soc tosc Sci nat (Ser B) 97: 311–327Google Scholar
  16. Paine RT (1964) Ash and caloric determinations of sponge and opisthobranch tissues. Ecology 45: 384–387Google Scholar
  17. Petersen CGJ (1918) The sea bottom and its production of fish-food. A survey of the work done in connection with valuation of the Danish waters from 1883–1917. Rep Dan biol Stn 25: 1–62Google Scholar
  18. Rainer SF, Wadley VA (1991) Abundance, growth and production of the bivalve Solemya sp., a food source for juvenile rock lobsters in a seagrass community in Western Australia. J exp mar Biol Ecol 152: 201–223Google Scholar
  19. Richards NJ, Richards SW (1965) Effect of decalcification procedures on the dry weights of benthic invertebrates. Limnol Oceanogr 10: 469–471Google Scholar
  20. Robertson AL (1979) The relationship between annual production: biomass ratio and life span for marine macrobenthos. Oecologia 38: 193–202Google Scholar
  21. Rumohr H, Brey T, Ankar S (1987) A compilation of biometric conversion factors for benthic invertebrates of the Baltic Sea. Publs Baltic mar Biologists 9: 1–56Google Scholar
  22. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 2nd edn. W. H. Freeman & Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Thayer GW, Schaaf WE, Angelovich JW, Lacroix MW (1973) Caloric measurements of some estuarine organisms. Fish Bull US 71: 289–296Google Scholar
  24. Thorson G (1957) Bottom communities (sublittoral or shallow shelf). In: Hedgpeth JW (ed) Treatise on marine ecology and paleoecology. 1. Ecology Mem geol Soc Am 67: 461–534Google Scholar
  25. True MA (1970) Étude quantitative de quatre peuplements sciaphiles sur substrat rocheux dans la région marseillaise. Bull Inst océanogr Monaco 69 (1401): 1–48Google Scholar
  26. Tyler AV (1973) Caloric values of some North Atlantic invertebrates. Mar Biol 19: 258–261Google Scholar
  27. Zwarts L (1991) Seasonal variation in body weight of the bivalves Macoma balthica, Scrobicularia plana, Mya arenaria and Cerastoderma edule in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Neth J Sea Res 28: 231–245Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Palmerini
    • 1
  • C. N. Bianchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro Ricerche Ambiente MarinoENEALa SpeziaItaly

Personalised recommendations