Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 125, Issue 4, pp 649–654 | Cite as

Symbiotic zooxanthellae enhance boring and growth rates of the tropical sponge Anthosigmella varians forma varians

  • M. S. Hill
Article

Abstract

Several species of boring sponges harbor symbiotic zooxanthellae, and it is believed that the symbiont enhances boring activity of host sponges. This hypothesis was tested using manipulative field experiments to assess the effect of intracellular zooxanthella populations on boring rates of the tropical sponge Anthosigmella varians forma varians. Portions of sponge were attached to 60 calcium carbonate blocks of known weight. Three sets of 10 blocks were grown at high light levels and three sets of 10 blocks were grown at low light levels for 105 d in the Florida Keys, Florida, USA. Boring rates, growth rates (lateral growth and within-substratum tissue penetration), and zooxanthella populations were measured at the end of the experiment. Absolute rates of boring and growth of A. varians forma varians were significantly greater when zooxanthella densities were higher. Boring rate and tissue penetration related to final surface area of sponge attachment was also enhanced when zooxanthella densities were higher, suggesting that the symbiont plays a physiological role in the decalcification process. This is in contrast to the role that zooxanthellae play in coral hosts. Based on the results of this study, it appears that the presence of zooxanthellar symbionts has important ecological and life-history consequences for host sponges. Ability to laterally overgrow competitors will be correlated with the size and activity of zooxanthella populations. In addition, the fitness of host sponges will be enhanced by algal symbionts, since greater penetration within substrata will result in an increase in production of tissue that can be converted into storage, feeding and reproductive functions.

Keywords

Sponge Calcium Carbonate Coral Host Carbonate Block Algal Symbiont 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alcolado PM (1990) General features of Cuban sponge communities. In: Rützler K (ed) New perspectives in sponge biology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 351–357Google Scholar
  2. Barnes DJ, Chalker BE (1990) Calcification and photosynthesis in reef-building corals and algae. In: Dubinsky Z (ed) Ecosystems of the world. Vol. 25. Coral reefs. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 109–131Google Scholar
  3. Carriker MR, Chauncey HH (1974) Effect of carbonic anhydrase inhibition on shell penetration by the muricid gastropod Ursalpinx cinerea. Malacologia 12: 247–263Google Scholar
  4. Chalker BE, Barnes DJ, Dunlap WC, Jokiel PL (1988) Light and reef-building corals. Interdisciplinary Sci Rev 13: 222–237Google Scholar
  5. Chetail M, Fournie J (1969) Shell-boring mechanism of the gastropod, Purpura lapillus L.: a physiological demonstration of the role of carbonic anhydrase in the dissolution of CaCO3. Am Zool 9: 983–990Google Scholar
  6. Crumeyrolles-Duclaux G (1970) Sur la position systematique des zooxanthelles de Cliona viridis (Schm.), spongaire. Cr hebd Séanc Acad Sci, Paris 270: 1238–1239Google Scholar
  7. Gleason DF, Wellington GM (1993) Ultraviolet radiation and coral bleaching. Nature, Lond 365: 836–838Google Scholar
  8. Glynn PW (1973) Aspects of the ecology of coral reefs in the western Atlantic region. In: Jones OA, Endean R (eds) Biology and geology of coral reefs. Vol. 1. Biology. Academic Press, New York, pp 271–324Google Scholar
  9. Goreau TF, Hartman WD (1963) Boring sponges as controlling forces in the formation and maintenance of coral reefs. Publs Am Ass Advmt Sci 75: 25–54Google Scholar
  10. Hatch WI (1980) The implication of carbonic anhydrase in the physiological mechanism of penetration of carbonate substrata by the marine burrowing sponge Cliona celata (Demospongiac). Biol Bull mar biol Lab, Woods Hole 139: 135–147Google Scholar
  11. Heatfield BM (1970) Calcification in echinoderms: effects of temperature and diamox on incorporation of calcium-45 in vitro by regenerating spines of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Biol Bull mar biol Lab, Woods Hole 139: 151–163Google Scholar
  12. Hurlbert SH (1984) Psuedoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54: 187–211Google Scholar
  13. Istin M, Girard JP (1970) Carbonic anhydrase and mobilization of calcium reserves in the mantle of lamellibranchs. Calcif Tissue Res 5: 247–260Google Scholar
  14. Marsh JA (1970) Primary productivity of reef building calcareous red algae. Ecology 51: 255–263Google Scholar
  15. Neumann AC (1966) Observations on coastal erosion in Bermuda and measurements of the boring rate of the sponge, Cliona lampa. Limnol Oceanogr 11: 92–108Google Scholar
  16. Pang RK (1973) The ecology of some Jamaican excavaring sponges. Bull mar Sci 23: 227–243Google Scholar
  17. Pomponi SA (1977) Excavation of calcium carbonate substrates by boring sponges: ultrastructure and cytochemistry. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Miami, Miami, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  18. Pomponi SA (1980) Cytological mechanisms of calcium carbonate excavation by boring sponges. Int Rev Cytol 65: 301–319Google Scholar
  19. Rosell D, Uriz MJ (1991) Cliona virids (Schmidt, 1862) and Cliona nigricans (Schmidt, 1862) (Porifera: Hadromerida): evidence which shows they are the same species. Ophelia 33: 45–53Google Scholar
  20. Rosell D, Uriz MJ (1992) Do associated zooxanthellae and the nature of the substratum affect survival, attachment and growth of Cliona viridis (Porifera: Hadromerida)? An experimental approach. Mar Biol 114: 503–507Google Scholar
  21. Rüzler K (1975) The role of burrowing sponges in bioerosion. Oecologia 19: 203–216Google Scholar
  22. Rützler K (1990) Associations between Caribbean sponges and photosynthetic organisms. In: Rützler K (ed) New perspectives in sponge biology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 455–466Google Scholar
  23. Sara M, Liaci L (1964) Symbiotic associations between zooxanthelae and two marine sponges of the genus Cliona. Nature, Lond 203: p. 321Google Scholar
  24. Schmahl, G (1990) Community structure and ecology of sponges associated with four southern Florida coral reefs. In: Rützler K (ed) New perspectives in sponge biology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 376–383Google Scholar
  25. Smarsh A, Chauncey HH, Carriker MR, Person P (1969) Carbonic anhydrase in the accessory boring organ in the gastropod Urosalpinx. Am Zool 9: 967–982Google Scholar
  26. Sullivan KM, M Chiappone (1992) A comparison of belt quadrat and species presence/absence sampling of stony coral (Scleractinia and Milleporina) and sponges for evaluating species patterning on patch reefs of the central Bahamas. Bull mar Sci 50: 464–488Google Scholar
  27. Turquier Y (1968) Recherches sur la biologie des cirripèdes acrothoraciques. I. L'anhydrase carbonique et le méchanisme de perforation du substrat par Trypetesa nassarioides Turq. Archs Zool exp gén 109: 113–122Google Scholar
  28. Vacelet J (1981) Algalsponge symbioses in the coral reefs of New-Caledonia: morphological study. (Proc 4th int coral Reef Symp 2: 713–719) [Gomez EJ et al. (eds) Marine Sciences Center, University of the Philippines, Quezon City, Philippines]Google Scholar
  29. Vicente VP (1978) An ecological evaluation of the West Indian demosponge Anthosigmella varians (Hadromerida: Spirastrellidae). Bull mar Sci 28: 771–777Google Scholar
  30. Weis VM (1991) The induction of carbonic anhydrase in the symbiotic sea anemone Aiptasia puchella. Biol Bull mar biol Lab, Woods Hole 180: 496–504Google Scholar
  31. Weis VM, Smith GJ, Muscatine L (1989) A “CO2 supply” mechanism in zooxanthellate cnidarians: role of carbonic anhydrase. Mar Biol 100: 195–202Google Scholar
  32. Wellington, GM (1982) An experimental analysis of the effects of light and zooplankton on coral zonation. Oecologia 52: 311–320Google Scholar
  33. Wiedenmayer F (1977) Shallow water sponges of the western Bahamas. Birkhauser Verlag, BaselGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilkinson CR (1987) Significance of microbial symbionts in sponge evolution and ecology. Symbiosis 4: 135–146Google Scholar
  35. Wilkinson CR (1992) Symbiotic interactions between marine sponges and algae. In: Reisser W (ed) Algae and symbioses: plants, animals, fungi and viruses, interactions explored. Bio-press Ltd., Bristol, pp 112–151Google Scholar
  36. Yellowlees D, Dionisio-Sese ML, Masuda K, Maruyama T, Abe T, Baillie B, Tsuzuki M, Miyachi S (1993) Role of carbonic anhydrase in the supply of inorganic carbon to the giant clam-zooxanthellate symbiosis. Mar Biol 115: 605–611Google Scholar
  37. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Engle-wood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. S. Hill
    • 1
  1. 1.Program in Evolutionary Biology and Ecology Department of BiologyUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations