Marine Biology

, Volume 124, Issue 1, pp 137–146

Extensive gene flow among mytilid (Bathymodiolus thermophilus) populations from hydrothermal vents of the eastern Pacific

  • C. Craddock
  • W. R. Hoeh
  • R. A. Lutz
  • R. C. Vrijenhoek


Prior studies of the hydrothermal vent mussel Bathymodiolus thermophilus (Bivalvia: Mytilidae), provided conflicting predictions about the dispersal ability and population structure of this highly specialized species. Analyses of morphological features associated with its larval shells revealed a feeding larval stage that might facilitate dispersal between ephemeral vent habitats. In contrast, an allozyme study revealed substantial genetic differentiation between samples taken from populations 2370 km apart on Galápagos Rift (Latitude 0°N) and the East Pacific Rise (13°N). To resolve the discrepancy between these studies, we examined allozyme and mitochondrial (mt) DNA variation in new samples from the same localities plus more recently discovered sites (9° and 11°N) along the East Pacific Rise. Although analysis of 26 enzyme-determining loci revealed relatively low levels of genetic variation within the five populations, no evidence existed for significant barriers to dispersal among populations. We estimated an average effective rate of gege flow (Nm) of ≃ 8 migrants per population per generation. Two common mtDNA variants predominated at relatively even frequencies in each population, and similarly provided no evidence for barriers to gene flow or isolation-by-distance across this species' known range. Larvae of this species appear to be capable of dispersing hundreds of kilometers along a continuous ridge system and across gaps separating non-contiguous spreading centers.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bayne BL (1965) Growth and delay of metamorphosis of the larvae of Mytilus edulis (L.) Ophelia 2: 1–47Google Scholar
  2. Bayne BL (1971) Some morphological changes that occur at the metamorphosis of the larvae of Mytilus edulis. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayne BL (1976) The biology of mussel larvae. In: Bayne BL (eds) Marine mussels. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 81–120Google Scholar
  4. Berg CJ Jr. (1985) Reproductive strategies of mollusks from abyssal hydrothermal vent communities. Bull biol Soc Wash 6: 185–197Google Scholar
  5. Birky CW Jr. (1991) Evolution and population genetics of organelle genes: mechanisms and models. In: Selander RK, Clark AG, Whittam TS (eds) Evolution at the molecular level. Smaue Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Mass, pp 112–134Google Scholar
  6. Black MB, Lutz RA, Vrijenhoek RC (1994) Gene flow among vestimentiferan tube worm (Riftia pachyptila) populations from hydrothermal vents of the eastern Pacific. Mar Biol 120: 33–39Google Scholar
  7. Butterfield DA, Massoth GJ, McDuff RE, Lupton JE, Lilley MD (1990) The chemistry of phase separated hydrothermal fluids from axial seamount hydrothermal emissions study (ASHES) vent field, Juan de Fuca Ridge: subseafloor boiling and subsequent fluid-rock interaction. J geophys Res 95: 12895–12921Google Scholar
  8. Chakraborty R, Danke-Hopfe H (1991) Analysis of population structure: a comparative study of different estimators of Wright's fixation indices. In: Roa CR, Chakraborty R (eds) Handbook of statistics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 203–254Google Scholar
  9. Chanley P, Andrews JD (1971) Aids for identification of bivalve larvae of Virginia. Malacologia 11: 45–119Google Scholar
  10. Clayton JW, Tretiak DW (1972) Amine-citrate buffers for pH control in starch gel electrophoresis. J Fish Res Bd Can 29: 1169–1172Google Scholar
  11. Craddock C, Hoeh WR, Gustafson RG, Lutz RA, Hashimoto J, Vrijenhoek RC (1995) Evolutionary relationships among deep-sea mytilids (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) from hydrothermal vents and cold-water methane/sulfide seeps. Mar Biol 121: 477–485Google Scholar
  12. Crow J, Kimura M (1970) An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper & Row. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Crow JF, Aoki K (1984) Group selection for a polygenic behavioral trait: estimating the degree of population subdivision. Proc natn Acad Sci USA 81: 6073–6077Google Scholar
  14. De Schweinitz EH, Lutz RA (1976) Larval development of the northern horse mussel, Modiolus modiolus (L.), including a comparison with the larvae of Mytilus edulis (L.) as an aid in planktonic development. Biol Bull mar biol Lab, Woods Hole 150: 348–360Google Scholar
  15. Desbruyères D, Crassous P, Grassle J, Khripounoff A, Reyss D, Rio M, Van Praet M (1982) Biological observations on new submarine thermal springs on East Pacific Rise. C r Acad Sci, Paris 295: 489–494Google Scholar
  16. Dowling TE, Moritz C, Palmer JD (1990) Nucleic acids. II. restriction site analysis. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C (eds) Molecular systematics. Sinauer Associates Inc. Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp 256–317Google Scholar
  17. Fisher C, Skibinski DOF (1990) Sex-biased mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in the marine mussel Mytilus. Proc R Soc (Ser B) 242: 149–156Google Scholar
  18. France sC, Hessler RR, Vrijenhoek RC (1992) Genetic differentiation between spatially-disjunct populations of the deep-sea, hydrothermal vent-endemic amphipod Ventiella sulfuris. Mar Biol 114: 551–559Google Scholar
  19. Grassle JF (1986) The ecology of deep-sea hydrothermal vent communities. Adv mar Biol 23: 301–362Google Scholar
  20. Grassle JP (1985) Genetic differentiation in populations of hydrothermal vent mussels (Bathymodiolus thermophilus) from the Galapagos Rift and 13°N on the East Pacific Rise. Bull biol Soc Wash 6: 429–442Google Scholar
  21. Haldane JBS (1954) An exact test for randomness of mating. J Genet 52: 631–635Google Scholar
  22. Haymon RM, Fornari DJ, Von Damm KL, Lilley MD, Perfit MR, Edmonds JM, Shanks WC III, Lutz RA, Grebmeir JM, Carbotte S, Wright D, McLaughlin E, Smith M, Beedle N, Olson E (1993) Volcanic eruption of the mid-ocean ridge along the East Pacific Rise crest at 9°45–52′N: direct submersible observations of seafloor phenomena associated with an eruption event in April, 1991. Earth planet Sci Lett 119: 85–101Google Scholar
  23. Hebert PDN, Beaton M (1989) Methodologies for allozyme analysis using cellulose acetate gels. Helena Laboratories, Beaumont, TexasGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoeh WR, Blakley KH, Brown WM (1991) Heteroplasmy suggests limited biparental inheritance of Mytilus mitochondrial DNA. Science, NY 251: 1488–1490Google Scholar
  25. Hu Y-P, Lutz RA, Vrijenhoek RC (1992) Electrophoretic identification and genetic analysis of bivalve larvae. Mar Biol 113: 227–230Google Scholar
  26. Kenk VC, Wilson BR (1985) A new mussel (Bivalvia, Mytilidae) from hydrothermal vents in the Galapagos Rift zone. Malacologia 26: 253–271Google Scholar
  27. Kimura M, Weiss WH (1964) The stepping stone model of genetic structure and the decrease of genetic correlation with distance. Genetics, Austin, Tex 49: 561–576Google Scholar
  28. Li CC, Horvitz DG (1953) Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficient. Am J hum Genet 95: 107–117Google Scholar
  29. Liu H-P, Mitton JP, Wu S-K (1995) Gender-specific mitochondrial DNA within and among populations of the freshwater mussel, Anodonta grandis grandis. Evolution (in press)Google Scholar
  30. Loosanoff VL, Davis HC, Chanley PE (1966) Dimensions and shapes of larvae of some marine bivalve mollusks. Malacologia 4: 351–435Google Scholar
  31. Lutz RA (1988) Dispersal of organisms at deep-sea hydrotermal vents: a review. Oceanol Acta 8: 23–30Google Scholar
  32. Lutz RA, Bouchet P, Jablonski D, Turner RD, Waren A (1986) Larval ecology of mollusks at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Am malac Bull 4: 49–54Google Scholar
  33. Lutz RA, Jablonski D, Rhoads DC, Turner RD (1980) Larval dispersal of a deep-sea hydrothermal vent bivalve from the Galápagos Rift. Mar Biol 57: 127–133Google Scholar
  34. Lutz RA, Jablonski D, Turner RD (1984) Larval development and dispersal at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Science, NY 226: 1451–1454Google Scholar
  35. Lutz RA, Kennish MJ (1993) Ecology of deep-sea hydrothermal vent communities: a review. Rev Geophys 31: 211–242Google Scholar
  36. Lutz RA, Rhoads DC, Jablonski D, Turner RD (1979) High larval dispersal capability of a deep-sea hydrothermal vent bivalve from the Galapagos Rift. Am Zool 19: p 927Google Scholar
  37. Lutz RA, Shank TM, Fornari DJ, Haymon RM, Lilley MD, Von Damm KL, Desbruyères D (1994) Rapid growth at deep-sea vents. Nature, Lond 371: 663–664Google Scholar
  38. Lynch M, Crease TJ (1990) The analysis of population survey data on DNA sequence variation. Molec Biol Evolut 7: 377–394Google Scholar
  39. Malécot G (1968) The mathematics of heredity. W.H. Freeman & Co., San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  40. McCauley DE (1991) Genetic consequences of local population extinction and recolonization. Trends Ecol Evolut 6: 5–8Google Scholar
  41. McConachy TF, Ballard RD, Mottl MJ, Von Herzen RP (1986) Geologic form and setting of a hydrothermal vent field at latitude 10°56′N. East Pacific Rise: a detailed study using ANGUS and ALVIN. Geology (Boulder, Colorads) 14: 295–298Google Scholar
  42. McElroy D, Moran P, Bermingham E, Kornfield I (1992) REAP: an integrated environment for the manipulation and phylogenetic analysis of restriction data. J Hered 83: 157–158Google Scholar
  43. Murphy RW, Sites JW Jr., Buth DG, Houfler CH (1990) Proteins. I. Isozyme electrophoresis. In: Hillis D, Moritz C (eds) Molecular systematics, Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland, Mass, pp 45–126Google Scholar
  44. Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics, Austin, Tex 89: 583–590Google Scholar
  45. Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Nei M, Chesser RK (1983) Estimation of fixation indices and gene diversities. Ann hum Genet 47: 253–259Google Scholar
  47. Nei M, Li. WH (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc natn Acad Sci USA 76: 5269–5273Google Scholar
  48. Roff DA, Bentzen P (1989) The statistical analysis of mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms: χ2 and the problem of small samples. Molec Biol Evolut 6: 539–545Google Scholar
  49. Rohlf FJ (1988) NTSYS-pc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 1. 50. Exeter Publishing, Ltd. Setauket, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Selander RK, Smith MH, Yang SY, Johnson WE, Gentry JR (1971) Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus. I. Variation in the old-field mouse (Peromyscus polionotus). Stud Genet, Austin, Tex 7103: 49–90Google Scholar
  51. Skibinski DOF, Cross TF, Ahmad M (1980) Electrophoretic investigation of systematic relationships in the marine mussels Modiolus modiolus L., Mytilus edulis L., and Mytilus galloprovincialis Lmk. (Mytilidae; Mollusca) Biol J Linn Soc 13: 73137–73183Google Scholar
  52. Skibinski DOF, Gallagher C, Benyon CM (1994a) Mitochondrial DNA inheritance. Nature, Lond 368: 817–818Google Scholar
  53. Skibinski DOF, Gallagher C, Benyon CM (1994b) Sex-limited mitochondrial DNA transmission in the marine mussel Mytilus edulis. Genetics, Austin, Tex 138: 801–809Google Scholar
  54. Slatkin M (1985) Rare alleles as indicators of gene flow. Evolution 39: 53–65Google Scholar
  55. Slatkin M (1993) Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations. Evolution 47: 264–279Google Scholar
  56. Slatkin M, Barton NH (1989) A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow. Evolution 43: 1349–1368Google Scholar
  57. Slatkin M, Maddison WP (1989) A cladistic measure of gene flow inferred from the phylogenies of alleles. Genetics, Austin, Tex 123: 603–613Google Scholar
  58. Slatkin M, Maddison WP (1990) Detecting isolation by distance using phylogenies of genes. Genetics, Austin, Tex 126: 249–260Google Scholar
  59. Southward EC (1988) Development of the gut and segmentation of newly settled stages of Ridgeia (Vestimentifera): implications for relationship between Vestimentifera and Pogonophora. J mar biol Ass UK 68: 465–487Google Scholar
  60. Swofford DL, Selander RK (1981) BIOSYS-1: a Fortran program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. J Hered 72: 281–283Google Scholar
  61. Takahata N, Palumbi SR (1985) Extranuclear differentiation and gene flow in a finite island model. Genetics, Austin, Tex 109: 441–457Google Scholar
  62. Tunnicliffe V (1991) The biology of hydrothermal vents: ecology and evolution. Oceanogr mar Biol A Rev 29: 319–407Google Scholar
  63. Turner RD, Lutz RA (1985) Growth and distribution of mollusks at deep-sea vents and seeps. Oceanus 27: 55–62Google Scholar
  64. Vrijenhoek RC, Schutz SJ, Gustafson RG, Lutz RA (1994) Cryptic species of deep-sea clams (Mollusca, Bivalvia, Vesicomyidae) in hydrothermal vent and cold-seep environments. Deep-Sea Res 41: 1171–1189Google Scholar
  65. Wahlund S (1928) Zusammensetzung von Populationen und Korrelationerscheinungen vom Standpunkt der Vererbungslehre ans betrachtet. Hereditas 11: 65–106Google Scholar
  66. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358–1370Google Scholar
  67. Workman PL, Niswander DJ (1970) Population studies on the southwestern Indian tribes. II. Local differentiation in the Papago. Am J hum Genet 22: 24–49Google Scholar
  68. Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, Austin, Tex 16: 97–159Google Scholar
  69. Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics, Austin, Tex 28: 114–138Google Scholar
  70. Zouros E, Ball AO, Saavedra C, Freeman KR (1994a) Mitochondrial DNA inheritance. Nature, Lond 368: p. 818Google Scholar
  71. Zouros E, Ball AO, Saavedra C, Freeman KR (1994b) An unusual mitcchondrial DNA inheritance in the blue mussel Mytilus. Proc natn Acad Sci USA 91: 7463–7467Google Scholar
  72. Zouros F, Freeman KR, Ball AO, Pogson GH (1992) Direct evidence for extensive paternal mitochondrial DNA inheritance in the marine mussel Mytilus. Nature, Lond 359: 412–414Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Craddock
    • 1
  • W. R. Hoeh
    • 1
  • R. A. Lutz
    • 1
  • R. C. Vrijenhoek
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Institute of Marine and Coastal SciencesRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations