Marine Biology

, Volume 123, Issue 4, pp 723–733 | Cite as

Mating systems in the sea anemone genus Epiactis

  • S. Edmands
Article

Abstract

Four morphologically similar species in the sea anemone genus Epiactis exhibit overlapping distributions on the Pacific coast of North America; E. prolifera, E. lisbethae, E. ritteri and E. fernaldi. All brood their offspring up to the juvenile stage, but each has a different combination of internal versus external brooding and hermaphroditism versus gonochory (separate sexes). Specimens were collected from sites ranging from British Columbia to southern California between December 1988 and July 1992. Mating systems were inferred from genetic comparisons of mothers and offspring histological analyses of sex expression and observations on brooding and spawning behavior. Allozyme and multilocus DNA fingerprint analyses of the gynodioecious hermaphrodite E. prolifera showed that offspring were all identical to their mothers, a result consistent with either asexual reproduction, self-fertilization or extreme biparental inbreeding. In the gonochore E. lisbethae, mothers and offspring were also electrophoretically identical, but variation in DNA fingerprints indicated cross-fertilization. Similar DNA fingerprint differences between mother and offspring in the gonochore E. ritteri implied that cross-fertilization also occurs in this species. No mother-offspring comparisons were performed on E. fernaldi, as this species was not observed brooding offspring during this study. Although incomplete, the results of this study increase our knowledge of the very unusual combination of reproductive modes in the genus Epiactis, and argue for further investigations of the evolution and genetic consequences of mating systems in these species.

Keywords

Mating System Asexual Reproduction Reproductive Mode Fingerprint Analysis Unusual Combination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aebersold PB, Winans GA, Teel DJ, Milner GB, Utter FM (1987) Manual for starch gel electrophoresis: a method for the detection of genetic variation. NOAA natn mar Fish Serv tech Rep US Dep Commerce 61: 1–9Google Scholar
  2. Ayala FJ, Hedgecock D, Zumwalt GS, Valentine JW (1973) Genetic variation in Tridacna maxima, an ecological analog of some unsuccessful evolutionary lineages. Evolution, Lawrence, Kansas 27: 177–191Google Scholar
  3. Ayre DJ (1984) Effects of environment and population density on the sea anemone Actinia tenebrosa. Aust J mar Freshwat Res 35: 735–746Google Scholar
  4. Ayre DJ (1988) Evidence for genetic determination of sex in Actinia tenebrosa. J exp mar Biol Ecol 116: 23–34Google Scholar
  5. Black R, Johnson MS (1979) Asexual viviparity and population genetics of Actinia tenebrosa. Mar Biol 53: 27–31Google Scholar
  6. Bucklin A, Hedgecock D, Hand C (1984) Genetic evidence of self-fertilization in the sea anemone Epiactis prolifera. Mar Biol 84: 175–182Google Scholar
  7. Burke T (1989) DNA fingerprinting and other methods for the study of mating success. Trends Ecol Evol 4: 139–144Google Scholar
  8. Burke T, Bruford MW (1987) DNA fingerprinting in birds. Nature, Lond 327: 149–152Google Scholar
  9. Carter MA, Thorp CH (1979) The reproduction of Actinia equina var. mesembryanthemum. J mar biol Ass UK 59: 989–1001Google Scholar
  10. Chia F-S (1976) Sea anemone reproduction: patterns and adaptive radiation. In: Mackie GO (ed) Coelenterate ecology and behavior. Plenum Press, New York, pp 261–270Google Scholar
  11. Chia F-S, Rostron MA (1970) Some aspects of the reproductive biology of Actinia equina (Cnidaria: Anthozoa). J mar biol Ass UK 50: 253–264Google Scholar
  12. Coffroth MA, Lasker HR, Diamond ME, Bruenn JA, Bermingham E (1992) DNA fingerprints of a gorgonian coral: a method for detecting clonal structure in vegetative species. Mar Biol 114: 317–325Google Scholar
  13. Dunn DF (1972) The natural history of the sea anemone Epiactis prolifera Verrill, 1869, with special reference to its reproductive biology, Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunn DF (1975a) Gynodioecy in an animal. Nature, Lond 253: 528–529Google Scholar
  15. Dunn DF (1975b) Reproduction of the externally brooding sea anemone Epiactis prolifera Verrill, 1869. Biol Bull mar biol Lab, Woods Hole 148: 199–218Google Scholar
  16. Dunn DF (1977a) Dynamics of external brooding in the sea anemone Epiactis prolifera. Mar Biol 39: 41–49Google Scholar
  17. Dunn DF (1977b) Variability of Epiactis prolifera (Coelenterata: Actiniaria) in the intertidal zone near Bodega Bay, California, J nat Hist 11: 457–463Google Scholar
  18. Edmands S (1994) Genetic and evolutionary consequences various reproductive strategies in the sea anemone genus Epiactis. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Santa CruzGoogle Scholar
  19. Ennos RA, Clegg MT (1982) Effects of population substructuring on estimates of outcrossing rate in plant populations. Heredity, Lond 48: 283–292Google Scholar
  20. Fautin DG, Chia F-S (1986) Revision of the sea anemone genus Epiactis (Coelenterata: Actiniaria) on the Pacific coast of North America, with descriptions of two new brooding species. Can J Zool 64: 1665–1674Google Scholar
  21. Franzen A (1970) Phylogenetic aspects of the morphology of spermatazoa and spermiogenesis. In: Bacetti B (ed) Comparative spermatology. Academic Press, New York, pp 29–46Google Scholar
  22. Gashout SE, Ormond RFG (1979) Evidence for parthenogenetic reproduction in the sea anemone Actinia equina L. J mar biol Ass UK 59: 975–987Google Scholar
  23. Hand C, Dunn DF (1974) Redescription and range extension of the sea anemone Cnidopus ritteri (Torrey) (Coelenterata: Actiniaria). Wasmann J Biol 32: 187–194Google Scholar
  24. Harriot VJ (1983a) Reproductive ecology of four scleractinian species at Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 2: 9–18Google Scholar
  25. Harriot VJ (1983b) Reproductive seasonality, settlement and post-settlement mortality of Pocillopora damicornis (Linnaeus), at Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 2: 151–157Google Scholar
  26. Harris H, Hopkinson DA (1976) Handbook of electrophoresis in human genetics. American Elsevir, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Harrison PL (1985) Sexual characteristics of scleractinian corals: systematics and evolutionary implications. Proc 5th int coral Reef Congr 4: 337–342 [Gabrié C et al. (eds) Antenne Museum-EPHE, Moorea, French Polynesia]Google Scholar
  28. Hoffmann RJ (1986) Variation in contributions of asexual reproduction to the genetic structure of populations of the sea anemone Metridium senile. Evolution, Lawrence, Kansas 42: 357–365Google Scholar
  29. Humason GL (1967) Animal tissue techniques. W.H. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  30. Jeffreys AJ, Morton DB (1987) DNA fingerprints of dogs and cats. Anim Genet 18: 1–15Google Scholar
  31. Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL (1985a) Hypervariable ‘minisatellite’ regions in human DNA. Nature, Lond 314: 67–73Google Scholar
  32. Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL (1985b) Individual-specific ‘fingerprints’ of human DNA. Nature, Lond 316: 76–79Google Scholar
  33. Larkman AV, Carter MA (1980) The spermatozoon of Actinia equina L. var. mesembryanthemum. J mar biol Ass UK 60: 193–204Google Scholar
  34. Levin DA (1978) Genetic variation in annual Phlox: self compatible versus self incompatible species. Evolution, Lawrence, Kansas 32: 245–263Google Scholar
  35. Lewis D, Crowe LK (1955) The genetics and evolution of gynodioecy. Evolution, Lawrence, Kansas 10: 115–125Google Scholar
  36. Lynch M (1990) The similarity index and DNA fingerprinting. Molec Biol Evolut 7: 478–484Google Scholar
  37. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. McGrath D, O'Foighil D (1986) Population dynamics and reproduction of hermaphroditic Lasaea rubra (Montagu), (Bivalvia: Galeommatacea). Ophelia 25: 209–219Google Scholar
  39. Murphy RW, Sites JW Jr, Buth DG, Haufler CH (1990) In: Hillis DM, Moritz C (eds) Molecular systematics, Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass, pp 45–126Google Scholar
  40. Orr J, Thorpe JP, Carter MA (1982) Biochemical genetic confirmation of the asexual reproduction of brooded offspring in the sea anemone Actinia equina. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 7: 227–229Google Scholar
  41. Ottaway JR (1979) Population ecology of the intertidal anemone Actinia tenebrosa. II. Geographical distribution, synonomy, reproductive cycle and fecundity. Aust J Zool 27: 273–290Google Scholar
  42. Ottaway JR, Kirby GC (1975) Genetic relationships between brooding and brooded Actinia tenebrosa. Nature, Lond 255: 221–223Google Scholar
  43. Philander SG (1992) El Niño. Oceanus 35(2): 56–61Google Scholar
  44. Rossi L (1975) Sexual races in Cereus pedunculatus (Boad.) Pubbl Staz zool Napoli (Suppl): 462–470Google Scholar
  45. Shaklee JB, Allendorf FW, Morizot DC, Whitt GS (1990) Gene nomenclature for protein-coding loci in fish. Trans Am Fish Soc 119: 2–15Google Scholar
  46. Shaw CR, Prasad R (1970) Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes: a compilation of recipes. Biochem Genet 4: 297–320Google Scholar
  47. Shick JM, Lamb AN (1977) Asexual reproduction and genetic population structure in the colonizing sea anemone Haliplanella luciae. Biol Bull mar biol Lab, Woods Hole 153: 604–617Google Scholar
  48. Stoddart JA (1983) Asexual production of planulae in the coral Pocillopora damicornia. Mar Biol 76: 279–284Google Scholar
  49. Stoddart JA, Black R (1985) Cycles of gametogenesis and planulation in the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 23: 153–164Google Scholar
  50. Tracey ML, Nelson K, Hedgecock D, Shleser RA, Pressick ML (1975) Biochemical genetics of lobsters: genetic variation and the structure of the American lobster (Homarus americanus) population. J Fish Res Bd Can 32: 2091–2101Google Scholar
  51. Vassart G, Georges M, Monsieur R, Brocas H, Lequarre AS, Cristophe D (1987) A sequence in M13 phage detects hypervariable minisatellites in human and animal DNA. Science, NY 239: 683–684Google Scholar
  52. Ward RD, Beardmore JA (1977) Protein variation in the plaice (Pleuronectes platissa). Genet Res 30: 45–62Google Scholar
  53. Wetton JH, Carter RE, Parkin DT, Walters D (1987) Demographic study of a wild house sparrow population by DNA fingerprinting. Nature, Lond 327: 147–149Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Edmands
    • 1
  1. 1.Biology BoardUniversity of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations