, Volume 52, Issue 1, pp 49–56 | Cite as

Ecological correlates of anuran exercise physiology

  • Theodore L. Taigen
  • Sharon B. Emerson
  • F. Harvey Pough


Studies of exercise physiology of anuran amphibians have led to the suggestion that there is a dichotomy between species that depend upon movement to escape from predators and species that utilize static defenses. This generalization has been based upon a limited taxonomic survey and it contrasts with morphological, ecological, and behavioral studies that have revealed diverse and complex interrelationships among these features of anuran biology. We tested the hypothesis of a dichotomy of physiological types among anurans by measuring aerobic and anaerobic metabolism during maximum exercise for 17 species representing seven families and a variety of ecological types and locomotor modes. All degrees of dependence upon aerobic and anaerobic power input were found among the 17 species and the variation did not follow phylogenetic divisions. No single, simple prediction of the predominant source of power utilized for activity by the anurans we studied is possible. Predator avoidance behavior was not significantly correlated with the metabolic pattern. Predatory mode (active versus passive searchers) and mode of locomotion (non-jumpers versus jumpers) were correlated with dependence upon aerobic energy production and with each other. Reproductive behavior is probably another associated factor. The diversity of modes of power input among anurans is great and is intimately linked with numerous features of a species' biology. Single-factor explanations of this physiological characteristic are not appropriate.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson PK (1954) Studies in the ecology of the narrow-mouthed frog, Microhyla carolinensis carolinensis. Tulane Stud Zool 2:15–46Google Scholar
  2. Banta AM (1914) Sex recognition and mating behaviour of the wood frog, Rana sylvatica. Biol Bull 26:171–183Google Scholar
  3. Bennett AF, Licht P (1972) Anaerobic metabolism during activity in lizards. J comp Physiol 81:277–288Google Scholar
  4. Bennett AF, Licht P (1973) Relative contributions of anaerobic and aerobic energy production during activity in Amphibia. J comp Physiol 87:351–360Google Scholar
  5. Bennett AF, Licht P (1974) Anaerobic metabolism during activity in amphibians. Comp Biochem Physiol 48A:319–327Google Scholar
  6. Berry P (1965) The diet of some Singapore Anura (Amphibia). Proc Zool Soc London 144(2):163–174Google Scholar
  7. Bucher TL, Ryan MJ, Bartholomew GA Energy cost of activities associated with reproductive behavior in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus (MS)Google Scholar
  8. Carey C (1979) Aerobic and anaerobic energy expenditure during rest and activity in montane Bufo b. boreas and Rana pipiens. Oecologia 39:213–218Google Scholar
  9. Daniel WW (1976) Applied nonparametric statistics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. 1978Google Scholar
  10. Emerson SB (1976) Burrowing in frogs. J Morphol 149:437–458Google Scholar
  11. Emerson SB (1978) Allometry and jumping in frogs: helping the twain to meet. Evolution 32:551–564Google Scholar
  12. Emerson SB (1979) The ilio-sacral articulation in frogs: form and function. Biol J Linn Soc 11:153–168Google Scholar
  13. Firschein IL (1951) Phragmosis and the “unken reflex” in a Mexican hylid frog, Pternohyla fodiens. Copeia 1951:74Google Scholar
  14. Gans C, Parsons T (1966) On the origin of the jumping mechanism in frogs. Evolution 20:92–99Google Scholar
  15. Heatwole H (1961) Habitat selection and activity of the wood frog, Rana sylvatica Le Conte. Am Midl Nat 66:301–313Google Scholar
  16. Hillman SS (1976) Cardiovascular correlates of maximal oxygen consumption rates in anuran amphibians. J comp Physiol 109:199–207Google Scholar
  17. Hillman SS (1980) The effect of anemia on metabolic performance in the frog, Rana pipiens. J Exp Zool 211:107–111Google Scholar
  18. Hillman SS, Shoemaker VH, Putnam R, Withers PC (1979) Reassessment of aerobic metabolism in amphibians during activity. J comp Physiol 129:309–313Google Scholar
  19. Hillman SS, Withers PC (1979) An analysis of respiratory surface area as a limit to activity metabolism in anurans. Can J Zool 57:2100–2105Google Scholar
  20. Howard R (1978) The evolution of mating strategies in bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana. Evolution 32:852–876Google Scholar
  21. Hutchison VH, Miller K (1979) Anaerobic capacity of amphibians. Comp Biochem Physiol 63A:213–216Google Scholar
  22. Hutchinson VH, Turney LD (1975) Glucose and lactate concentrations during activity in the leopard frog, Rana pipiens. J comp Physiol 99:287–295Google Scholar
  23. Hutchison VH, Whitford WG, Kohl M (1968) Relation of body size and surface area to gas exchange in anurans. Physiol Zool 41:65–85Google Scholar
  24. Inger R, Marx H (1961) The food of amphibians. Explor Parc National de l'Upenba, fasc 64Google Scholar
  25. Marchisin A, Anderson J (1978) Strategies employed by frogs and toads to avoid predation by snakes. J Herpetol 12:151–155Google Scholar
  26. Miller K, Hutchison VH (1979) Aerobic and anaerobic scope for activity in the giant toad, Bufo marinus. Physiol Zool 53:170–175Google Scholar
  27. Putnam R (1979) The basis for differences in lactic acid content after activity in different species of anuran amphibians. Physiol Zool 52:509–519Google Scholar
  28. Rose W (1962) The reptiles and amphibians of southern Africa. Capetown: Maskew Miller, LtdGoogle Scholar
  29. Seymour RS (1973) Physiological correlates of forced activity and burrowing in the spadefoot toad, Scaphiopus hammondii. Copeia 1973:103–115Google Scholar
  30. Shine R (1979) Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in the Amphibia. Copeia 1979:297–306Google Scholar
  31. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods, 6th ed. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
  32. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. W.H. Freeman & Co., San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  33. Stewart MM (1967) Amphibians of Malawi. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  34. Taigen TL, Pough FH (1981) Activity metabolism of the toad (Bufo americanus): ecological consequences of ontogenetic change. J comp PhysiolGoogle Scholar
  35. Toft CA (1980) Feeding ecology of thirteen syntopic species of anurans in a seasonal tropical environment. Oecologia 45:131–141Google Scholar
  36. Wager VA (1965) The frogs of South Africa. Purnell & Sons Pty. Ltd, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  37. Wells KD (1976) Territorial behavior of the green frog (Rana clamitans). Ph D dissertation, Cornell UniversityGoogle Scholar
  38. Wells KD (1977a) The social behavior of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav 25:666–693Google Scholar
  39. Wells KD (1977b) Territoriality and male mating success in the green frog (Rana clamitans). Ecology 58:750–762Google Scholar
  40. Wells KD (1978) Territoriality in the green frog (Rana clamitans): vocalizations and agonistic behaviour. Anim Behav 26:1051–1063Google Scholar
  41. Wells KD (1979) Reproductive behaviour and male mating success in a Neotropical toad, Bufo typhonius. Biotropica 11:301–307Google Scholar
  42. Whitford WG (1973) The effects of temperature on respiration in the Amphibia. Am Zool 13:505–512Google Scholar
  43. Withers PD (1980) Oxygen consumption of plethodontid salamanders during rest, activity and recovery. Copeia 1980:781–789Google Scholar
  44. Zug GR (1972) Anuran locomotion: structure and function. I. Preliminary observations on relation between jumping and osteometrics of appendicular and postaxial skeleton. Copeia 1972:613–624Google Scholar
  45. Zug GR (1978) Anuran locomotion-structure and function, 2: Jumping performance of semiaquatic, terrestrial, and arboreal frogs. Smithsonian Contrib Zool 276:1–31Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theodore L. Taigen
    • 1
  • Sharon B. Emerson
    • 2
  • F. Harvey Pough
    • 3
  1. 1.Section of Ecology and Systematics, Langmuir LaboratoryCornell UniversityIthaca
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of Illinois at Chicago CircleChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Section of Ecology and Systematics, Langmuir LaboratoryCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations