Applied Physics A

, Volume 55, Issue 3, pp 231–234 | Cite as

Magnetoconductivity of thin epitaxial silver films

  • R. Schad
  • S. Heun
  • T. Heidenblut
  • M. Henzler
Solids And Materials

Abstract

The magnetoconductance (MC) of thin epitaxial Ag films on Si(111) surfaces is studied as a function of film thickness (1–125 monolayers (ML)) at 20 K under ultra high vacuum (UHV) conditions. Three different regimes of magnetoconductance are observed depending on the degree of disorder in the films which is controlled by film thickness and annealing procedures. Thick films (d>3 ML) with diffuse electron transport show in the case of large elastic scattering times τ0 a classical, negative MC ∞ B2 and in the case of small τ0 a positive MC due to weak localization effects. The MC of thin films (d<2 ML) which have a conductance smaller than e2/h, i.e. localized electron states, is negative again.

PACS

73.50.Jt 73.20.Nz 73.60.Aq 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A.B. Pippard: Magnetoresistance in Metals (Cambr. Univ., Cambridge 1989)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Abrahams, P.W. Anderson, D.C. Licciardello, T.V. Ramakrishnan: Phys. Rev. Lett. 42 (10), 673 (1979)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.E. Khmel'nitskii, A.I. Larkin: Solid State Commun. 39, 1069 (1981)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Bergmann: Phys. Rep. 107 (1), 1 (1984)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Bergmann: Z. Phys. B 48, 5 (1982)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Hikami, A.I. Larkin, Y. Nagaoka: Prog. Theor. Phys. 63, 707 (1980)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Maekawa, H. Fukuyama: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 50, 2516 (1981)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Bergmann, C. Horriar-Esser: Phys. Rev. B 31 (2), 1161 (1985)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T.G. Castner, W.N. Shafarman, J.S. Brooks, K.P. Martin, M.J. Naughton: In High Magnetic Fields in Semiconductor Physics, ed. by G. Landwehr, Springer Ser. Solid-State Sci., Vol. 71 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 1987)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P.W. Anderson: Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.A. Lee, T.V. Ramakrishnan: Rev. Mod. Phys. 57 (2), 287 (1985)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.M. Westervelt, M.J. Burns, P.F. Hopkins, A.J. Rimberg, G.A. Thomas: In Anderson Localisation, ed. by T. Ando, H. Fukuyama, Springer Proc. Phys., Vol. 28 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 1988)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Schad, S. Heun, T. Heidenblut, M. Henzler: To be published in Phys. Rev. B 45 (19)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. Jentzsch, H. Froitzheim, R. Theile: J. Appl. Phys. 66, 5901 (1989)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L.J. van der Pauw: Philips Res. Repts. 13, 1 (1958)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.A. Matula: J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 8 (4), 1147 (1979)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A.F. Ioffe, A.R. Regel: Prog. Semicond. 4, 237 (1960)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Thielking, E. Luo, M. Henzler: To be publishedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M.E. Gershenzon, V.N. Gubankov, Yu.E. Zhuravlev: JETP Lett. 35(11), 577 (1982)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    T. Kawaguti, Y. Fujimori: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 52 (3), 722 (1983)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Carl, G. Dumpich, E.F. Wassermann: Vaccum 41 (4–6), 1183 (1990)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Y. Imry: J. Appl. Phys. 52 (3), 1817 (1981)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Schad: Leitfähigkeit ultradünner epitaktischer Silberschichten auf Silizium (111), Fortschrittsberichte VDI, Reihe 9, Nr. 126 (VDI, Düsseldorf 1991)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    U. Scheithauer, G. Meyer, M. Henzler: Surf. Sci. 178, 441 (1986)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Schad
    • 1
  • S. Heun
    • 1
  • T. Heidenblut
    • 1
  • M. Henzler
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für FestkörperphysikUniversität HannoverHannover 1Fed. Rep. Germany

Personalised recommendations