Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 209–213 | Cite as

Predictions of fate from rosette size in four “biennial” plant species: Verbascum thapsus, Oenothera biennis, Daucus carota, and Tragopogon dubius

  • Katherine L. Gross
Article

Summary

Individual plants were marked in field populations of four biennial plant species, Verbascum thapsus L., Oenothera biennis L., Daucus carota L., and Tragopogon dubius Scop., and followed for 2 or 3 years. The relationship of both rosette size and age to the probability of an individual dying, remaining vegetative, or flowering was determined for each species. In all four species, a minimum size must be reached before flowering can be induced and above that minimum the probability of flowering increases directly with rosette size. Conversely, the probability of dying decreases with increasing rosette size. In general, the fate of a rosette appears to be independent of its age although in populations where the probability of death is high for individuals above the minimum size for flowering, the age of a rosette may influence its fate to some extent.

Keywords

Plant Species Individual Plant Minimum Size Field Population Biennial Plant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baskin JM, Baskin CC (1979a) Studies on the autoecology and population biology of the weedy monocarpic perennial, Pastinaca sativa. J Ecol 67:601–610Google Scholar
  2. Baskin JM, Baskin CC (1979b) Studies on the autoecology and population biology of the monocarpic perennial Grindelia lanceolata. Amer Midl Natur 102:290–299Google Scholar
  3. Gleason HA, Cronquist A (1963) Manual of vascular plants of Northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. D van Nostrand Co, Inc, Princeton NJGoogle Scholar
  4. Gleir JH, Caruso JL (1973) Low-temperature induction of starch degradation in roots of a biennial weed. Cryobiology 10:328–330Google Scholar
  5. Gleir JH, Caruso JL (1974) The influence of low temperatures on the activities of starch degradative enzymes in a cold-requiring plant. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 58:573–578Google Scholar
  6. Gross KL (1980) Colonization by Verbascum thapsus (Mullein) of an old-field in Michigan: Experiments on the effects of vegetation. J Ecol 68 (in press)Google Scholar
  7. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Harper JL, White J (1974) The demography of plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 5:419–463Google Scholar
  9. Holt BR (1972) Effect of arrival time on recruitment, mortality, and reproduction in successional plant populations. Ecology 53:668–673Google Scholar
  10. Mead R (1966) A relationship between individual plant spacing and yield. Ann Bot 30:301–309Google Scholar
  11. Meijden E van der, Waals-Kooi RE van der (1979) The population ecology of Senecio jacobea in a sand dune system. I. Reproductive strategy and the biennial habit. J Ecol 67:131–153Google Scholar
  12. Ross MA, Harper JL (1972) Occupation of biological space during seedling establishment. J Ecol 60:77–88Google Scholar
  13. Thomson JN (1978) Within patch structure and dynamics in Pastinaca sativa and resource availability to a specialized herbivore. Ecology 59:443–448Google Scholar
  14. Weaver SE, Cavers PB (1979) The effects of date of emergence and emergence order on seedling survival rates in Rumex crispus and R. obtusifolius. Can J Bot 57:730–738Google Scholar
  15. Werner PA (1975) Predictions of fate from rosette size in Teasel (Dipsacus follunom L.). Oecologia (Berl) 20:197–201Google Scholar
  16. Werner PA (1977) Colonization success of a “biennial” plant species: Experimental field studies of species cohabitation and replacement. Ecology 58:840–849Google Scholar
  17. Werner PA, Caswell H (1978) Population growth rates and age vs. stage distribution models for Teasel (Dipsacus sylvestris Huds.). Ecology 58:1103–1111Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine L. Gross
    • 1
  1. 1.W.K. Kellogg Biological Station and Department of ZoologyMichigan State UniversityHickory CornersUSA

Personalised recommendations