Social Indicators Research

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 407–422 | Cite as

The relationship between measures of subjective and economic well-being: A new look

  • Robin A. Douthitt
  • Maurice Macdonald
  • Randolph Mullis
Article

Abstract

The objective of this research is to examine the importance of variable specification in using economic variable to explain the variance in individual's perceived (1) overall psychological, (2) economic, and (3) non-economic well-being. Results indicate that careful specification of economic variables improves the explained variance of perceived subjective well-being. Specification of dependent variable, life satisfaction, based on a domain-specific scale, proves superior to using the response to the global satisfaction question, “How do you feel about life as a whole?’ Economic variables prove significant in explaining both perceived economic and non-economic domains of life satisfaction. Although its overall effect on life satisfaction is negative, increased family size is found to enhance non-economic life satisfaction, while detracting from economic aspects of life satisfaction.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. AckermanN. and B.Paolucci: 1983, Objective and subjective income adequacy: Their relationship to perceived life quality measures. Social Indicators Research, 12, pp. 25–48.Google Scholar
  2. AllardtE.: 1977, On the relationship between objective and subjective predicaments. Research Group for Comparative Sociology: University of Helsinki Research Reports, 16, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
  3. AndrewsF. M. and S. B.Withey: 1976, Social Indicators of Well-Being: American's Perceptions of Life Quality. (Plenum, New York and London).Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, A.: 1976, ‘Subjective measures of well-being,’ American Psychologist, February, pp. 117–124.Google Scholar
  5. CampbellA., P. E.Converse, and W. E.Rodgers: 1976, The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
  6. ClementeF., and W. J.Sauer: 1976, Life satisfaction in the United States. Social Forces, 54, pp. 621–631.Google Scholar
  7. ColasantoD., A.Kapteyn, and J.van derGaag: 1984, Two subjective definitions of poverty: Results from the Wisconsin Basic Needs Study. The Journal of Human Resources, 19, pp. 127–138.Google Scholar
  8. DanzigerS.: 1980, From Welfare to Work: Women's Experience in a Public Job Program (No. DP 612-80) (University of Wisconsin-Madison, Institute for Research on Poverty, Madison).Google Scholar
  9. DeatonA. and J.Muellbauer: 1980, Economics of Consumer Behavior (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  10. DohrenwendB. S.: 1973, Life events as stressors: A methodological inquiry, Journal of Health and Social Behavior 14, pp. 167–175.Google Scholar
  11. DuesenberryJ. S.: 1949, Income, Savings, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior (Harvard University, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  12. DurkheimE.: 1951, Suicide (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  13. FernandezR., and J. C.Kulik: 1981, A multilevel mode of life satisfaction: Effects of individual characters and neighborhood composition. American Sociological Review 46, pp. 840–850.Google Scholar
  14. FriedmanM.: 1952, A method of comparing incomes of families of differing compositions. In Studies of Income and Wealth Vol. 15 (National Bureau of Economic Research, New York).Google Scholar
  15. GarfinkelI., and R.Haveman: 1977, Earnings capacity, economic status, and poverty. In M.Moon and E.Smolensky (Ed.), Improving Measures of Economic Well-Being (Academic Press, New York) pp. 51–74.Google Scholar
  16. HeckmanJ.: 1979, ‘Sample selection as a specification error,’ Econometrica 47, pp. 153–161.Google Scholar
  17. HofferthS. L.: 1983, Childbearing decision-making and family well-being: A dynamic, sequential model. American Sociological Review 48, pp. 533–545.Google Scholar
  18. McLanahanS.: 1985, Family structure and the reproduction of poverty. American Journal of Sociology 90, pp. 873–901.Google Scholar
  19. MeadG. H.: 1962, In C. W.Morris (Ed.) Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist Vol. 1 (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London).Google Scholar
  20. MertonR.: 1957, Social and structure and anomie. In Social Theory and Social Structure (The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois) pp. 131–160.Google Scholar
  21. MutranE., and D. C.Reitzes: 1984, Intergenerational support activities and well-being among the elderly: A convergence of exchange and symbolic interaction perspectives. American Sociological Review 49, pp. 117–130.Google Scholar
  22. RainwaterL.: 1974, What Money Buys: Inequality and the Social Meaning of Money (Basic Books, Inc., New York).Google Scholar
  23. SmeedingT. M.: 1977, The economic well-being of low-income households: Implications for income inequality and poverty. In M.Moon and E.Smolensky (Eds.) Improving Measures of Economic Well-Being (Academic Press, New York) pp. 155–183.Google Scholar
  24. van derGaagJ. and E.Smolensky: 1982, ‘Consumer expenditures and the evaluation of levels of living, Review of Income and Wealth 28, pp. 17–27.Google Scholar
  25. WachtellW.: 1983, ‘The unperceived realities of consumer life.’ In W. Wachtell A Psychological Portrait of the American Family (John Wiley, New York).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin A. Douthitt
    • 1
  • Maurice Macdonald
    • 1
  • Randolph Mullis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Consumer ScienceUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations