Marine Biology

, Volume 118, Issue 4, pp 739–744 | Cite as

Relearning the ABC: taxonomic changes and abundance/biomass relationships in disturbed benthic communities

  • R. M. Warwick
  • K. R. Clarke


For marine macrobenthic communities, a shift from higher biomass dominance with increasing levels of disturbance can be determined by the abundance/biomass comparison (ABC) method. This response results from (i) a shift in the proportions of different phyla present in communities, some phyla having larger-bodied species than others, and (ii) a shift in the relative distributions of abundance and biomass among species within the Annelida (specifically Polychaeta) but not within any of the other major phyla (Mollusca, Crustacea, Echinodermata). The shift within polychaetes reflects the substitution of largerbodied by smaller-bodied species, and not a change in the average size of individuals within a species. In most instances the phyletic changes reinforce the trend in species substitutions within the polychaetes, to produce the overall ABC response, but in some cases they may work against each other. Indications of pollution or disturbance detected by this method should be viewed with caution if the species responsible for the polluted configurations are not polychaetes. These observations provide an aid to interpretation of the ABC plots, especially in some situations where they have been deemed to give a false impression of the disturbance status of a community.


Biomass Mollusca High Biomass Polychaete Benthic Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agard, J. B. R., Gobin, J., Warwick, R. M. (1993). Analysis of marine macrobenthic community structure in relation to pollution, natural oil seepage and seasonal disturbance in a tropical environment (Trinidad, West Indies). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 92: 233–243Google Scholar
  2. Anderlini, V. C., Wear, R. G. (1992). The effect of sewage and natural seasonal disturbances on benthic macrofaunal communities in Fitzroy Bay, Wellington, New Zealand. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 24: 21–26Google Scholar
  3. Arntz, W. E., Rumohr, H. (1982) An experimental study of macrobenthic colonization and succession, and the importance of seasonal variation in temperate latitudes. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 64: 17–45Google Scholar
  4. Austen, M. C., Buchanan, J. B., Hunt, H. G., Josefson, A. B., Kendall, M. A. (1991). Comparison of long-term trends in benthic and pelagic communities of the North Sea. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 71: 179–190Google Scholar
  5. Austen, M. C., Warwick, R. M., Rosando, M. C. (1989). Meiobenthic and macrobenthic community structure along a putative pollution gradient in southern Portugal. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 20: 398–405Google Scholar
  6. Beukema, J. J. (1988). An evaluation of the ABC-method (abundance/biomass comparison) as applied to macrozoobenthic communities living on tidal flats in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Mar. Biol. 99: 425–433Google Scholar
  7. Buchanan, J. B., Warwick, R. M. (1974). An estimate of benthic macrofauna production in the offshore mud of the Northumberland coast. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 54: 197–222Google Scholar
  8. Clarke, K. R. (1990). Comparisons of dominance curves. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 138: 143–157Google Scholar
  9. Dauer, D. M., Luckenbach, M. W., Rodi, A. J., Jr. (1993). Abundance biomass comparison (ABC method): effects of an estuarine gradient, anoxic/hypoxic events and contaminated sediments. Mar. Biol. 116: 507–518Google Scholar
  10. Dauvin, J.-C. (1984). Dynamique d'ecosystemes macrobenthiques des fonds sedimentaires de la Baie de Morlaix et leur pertubation par les hydrocarbures de l'Amoco-Cadiz. Doctoral thesis. Université Pierre et Marie Curie, ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. Gray, J. S., Aschan, M., Carr, M. R., Clarke, K. R., Green, R. H., Pearson, T. H., Rosenberg, R., Warwick, R. M. (1988) Analysis of community attributes of the benthic macrofauna of Frierfjord/Langesundfjord and in a mesocosm experiment. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 46: 151–165Google Scholar
  12. Grizzle, R. E., Penniman, C. A. (1991). Effects of organic enrichment on estuarine macrofaunal benthos: a comparison of sediment profile imaging and traditional methods. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 74: 249–262Google Scholar
  13. Ibanez, F., Dauvin, J.-C. (1988). Long-term changes (1977–1987) in a muddy fine sand Abra alba-Melinna palmata community from the Western English Channel: multivariate time-series analysis. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 49: 65–81Google Scholar
  14. Josefson, A. B. (1981). Persistence and structure of two deep macrobenthic communities in the Skaggerak (west coast of Sweden). J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 50: 63–97Google Scholar
  15. Kröncke, I., Duineveld, G. C. A., Raak, S., Rachor, E., Daan, R. (1992). Effects of a former discharge of drill cuttings on the macrofauna community. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 91: 277–287Google Scholar
  16. Kröncke, I., Rachor, E. (1992). Macrofauna investigations along a transect from the inner German Bight towards the Dogger Bank. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 91: 269–276Google Scholar
  17. McManus, J. W., Pauly, D. (1990). Measuring ecological stress: variations on a theme by R. M. Warwick. Mar. Biol. 106: 305–308Google Scholar
  18. Meire, P. M., Dereu, J. (1990). Use of the abundance/biomass comparison method for detecting environmental stress: some considerations based on intertidal macrozoobenthos and bird communities. J. appl. Ecol. 27: 210–223Google Scholar
  19. Pearson, T. H. (1975). The benthic ecology of Loch Linnhe and Loch Eil, a sea-loch system on the west coast of Scotland. IV. Changes in the benthic fauna attributable to organic enrichment. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 20: 1–41Google Scholar
  20. Pearson, T. H. (1987). The benthic ecology of an accumulating sludge disposal ground. In: Capuzzo, J., Kester, D. (eds.) Biological processes and wastes in the ocean. R. E. Krieger, Melbourne, Florida, p. 195–200Google Scholar
  21. Pearson, T. H., Blackstock, J. (1984). Garroch Head sludge dumping ground survey, final report. Dunstaffnage Marine Research Laboratory, Oban (unpublished report)Google Scholar
  22. Pearson, T. H., Rosenberg, R. (1978). Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanogr. mar. Biol. A. Rev. 16: 229–311Google Scholar
  23. Ritz, D. A., Lewis, M. E., Ma Shen (1989). Response to organic enrichment of infaunal macrobenthic communities under salmonid seacages. Mar. Biol. 103: 211–214Google Scholar
  24. Scheffé, H. (1959). The analysis of variance. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Warwick, R. M. (1986). A new method for detecting pollution effects on marine macrobenthic communities. Mar. Biol. 92: 557–562Google Scholar
  26. Warwick, R. M. (1993). Environmental impact studies on marine communities: pragmatical considerations. Aust. J. Ecol. 18: 63–80Google Scholar
  27. Warwick, R. M., Clarke, K. R. (1991). A comparison of some methods for analysing changes in benthic community structure. J. mar. biol. Ass. UK. 71: 225–244Google Scholar
  28. Warwick, R. M., Clarke, K. R. (1993). Comparing the severity of disturbance: a meta-analysis of marine macrobenthic community data. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 92: 221–231Google Scholar
  29. Warwick, R. M., George, C. L., Davies, J. R. (1978). Annual macrofauna production in a Venus community. Estuar. cstl mar. Sci. 7: 215–241Google Scholar
  30. Warwick, R. M., Pearson, T. H., Ruswahyuni (1987). Detection of pollution effects on marine macrobenthos: further evaluation of the species abundance/biomass method. Mar. Biol. 95: 193–200Google Scholar
  31. Weston, D. P. (1990). Quantitative examination of macrobenthic community changes along an organic enrichment gradient. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 61: 233–244Google Scholar
  32. Ye, L.-X., Ritz, D. A., Fenton, G. E., Lewis, M. E. (1991). Tracing the influence on sediments of organic waste from a salmonid farm using stable isotope analysis. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 145: 161–174Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. M. Warwick
    • 1
  • K. R. Clarke
    • 1
  1. 1.Plymouth Marine LaboratoryPlymouthEngland

Personalised recommendations