Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 1–6 | Cite as

Niche breadth and resource partitioning by four sympatric species of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)

  • T. D. Paine
  • M. C. Birch
  • P. Švihra
Article

Summary

Standing loblolly pines in southeastern North America are colonized by four sympatric species of bark beetles: Dendroctonus frontalis (Zimm.), Ips calligraphus (Germ.), I. grandicollis (Eichh.) and I. avulsus (Eichh.). The beetles compete for the limited amount of phloem tissue used as a site for reproduction. Using indices of niche breadth and niche overlap determined from the surface areas attacked, the interaction of colonizing beetle species in partitioning resources in entire trees and within each sample level was examined. The broadest niche breadth was exhibited by I. avulsus, while I. grandicollis had the narrowest. D. frontalis dominated the lower bole and overlapped primarily with I. calligraphus. The upper bole was similarly dominated by I. avulsus, which overlapped only slightly with D. frontalis, but overlapped extensively with I. calligraphus. Within tree species diversity was highest in the mid-bole sections and declined progressively toward the stump and top. Increasing species diversity showed a strong positive correlation with increasing mean niche overlap.

Keywords

Tree Species North America Bark Species Diversity Strong Positive Correlation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker WL (1972) Eastern forest inseets. USDA Forest Service Misc. Publications No. 1175.Google Scholar
  2. Barras SJ (1970) Antagonism between Dendroctonus frontalis and the fungus Ceratocystis minor. Ann Ent Soc of Amer 63:1187–1190Google Scholar
  3. Berryman AA (1974) Dynamics of bark beetle populations: towards a general productivity model. Env Ent 3:579–585Google Scholar
  4. Birch MC, Švihra P, Paine TD, Miller JC (1980) Olfactory discrimation among four sympatric species of bark beetles: a mechanism of resource partitioning. J Chem Ecol 6:395–414Google Scholar
  5. Brown JH (1975) Geographical ecology of desert rodents. In: Ecology and evolution of communities ML Cody and JM Diamond (eds), Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge p 315–341Google Scholar
  6. Cody ML (1968) On the methods of resource division in grassland bird communities. Amer Nat 102:107–144Google Scholar
  7. Colwell RK, Fuentes ER (1975) Experimental studies of the niche. Ann Rev Ecol and Syst 6:281–310Google Scholar
  8. Colwell RK, Futuyma DJ (1971) On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology 52:567–576Google Scholar
  9. Coulson RN, Mayyasi AM, Foltz JL, Hain FP, Martin WC (1976) Resource utilization by the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can Ent 108:353–362Google Scholar
  10. Denno RF, Cothran WR (1975) Niche relationships of a guild of necrophagous flies. Ann Ent Soc of Amer 68:741–754Google Scholar
  11. Dudley CO (1971) A sampling design for the egg and first instar larval populations of the western pine beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can Ent 103:1291–1313Google Scholar
  12. Graham SA, Knight FB (1965) Principles of forest entomology. McGraw-Hill New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanson SR (1978) Resource utilization and coexistence of three species of Pogonomyrmex ants in an upper sonoran grassland community. Oecologia (Berl.) 35:109–117Google Scholar
  14. Horn HS (1966) Measurement of “overlap” in comparative ecological studies. Amer Nat 160:419–424Google Scholar
  15. Hutchinson GE (1958) Concluding Remarks. Cold Springs Harbor Symp Quant Biol 22:415–427Google Scholar
  16. Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explorations. Princeton University Press PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  17. Mathre PE (1964) Pathogenicity of Ceratocystis ips and Certocystis minor to Pinus ponderosa. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst 22:363–388Google Scholar
  18. Mayyasi AM, Coulson RN, Foltz JL, Hain FP, Martin WC (1976) Functional description of with-in tree larval and progeny adult populations of Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can Ent 108:363–373Google Scholar
  19. McCloskey RT (1976) Community structure in sympatric rodents. Ecology 57:728–739Google Scholar
  20. McMullen LH, Atkins MD (1961) Intraspecific competition as a factor in the natural control of the douglas-fir beetle. For Sci 7:197–203Google Scholar
  21. Pianka ER (1969) Sympatry of desert lizards (Ctenotus) in western Australia. Ecology 50:1012–1030Google Scholar
  22. Pianka ER (1975) Niche relations of desert lizards. In: Ecology and evolution of communities ML Cody and JM Diamond (eds), Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge p 294–314Google Scholar
  23. Pielou EC (1972) Niche width and niche overlap: a method for measuring them. Ecology 53:687–692Google Scholar
  24. Pielou EC (1975) Ecological diversity. John Wiley and Sons New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Price PW (1971) Niche breadth and dominance of parasitic insects sharing the same host species. Ecology 52:589–597Google Scholar
  26. Price PW (1975) Insect Ecology. John Wiley and Sons New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Pulley PE, Foltz JL, Mayyasi AM, Coulson RN, Martin WC (1977) Sampling procedures for within tree attacking adult populations of the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can Ent 109:39–48Google Scholar
  28. Rathcke BJ (1976) Competition and coexistence within a guild of herbiverous insects. Ecology 57:76–87Google Scholar
  29. Schoener TW (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27–39Google Scholar
  30. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1963) The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Southwood TRE (1968) Ecological methods with particular reference to the study of insect populations. Methuen and Co. LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Struble GR (1966) California five spined Ips USDA Forest Service. Forest Pest Leaflet 102Google Scholar
  33. Švihra P, Paine TD, Birch MC (1980) Interspecific olfactory communications in southern pine beetles. Naturwissenschaften 67:518–519Google Scholar
  34. Vandermeer JH (1972) Niche theory. Ann Rev Ecol and Syst 3:107–132Google Scholar
  35. Vité JP, Gara RI, von Scheller DH (1964) Field observations on the response to attractants of bark beetles infesting soutehrn pines. Cont from Boyce Thomspon Inst 22:461–470Google Scholar
  36. Vité JP, Ohloff PG, Billings RF (1978) Pheromonal chirality and integrity of aggregation response in southern species of the bark beetle Ips sp. Nature 272:818–819Google Scholar
  37. Whitham TG (1978) Habitat selection by Pemphigus aphids in response to resource limitation and competition. Ecology 59: 1164–1176Google Scholar
  38. Yearian WC, Gauger RJ, Wilkinson RC (1972) Effects of the blue stain fungus, Ceratocystis ips on the development of Ips bark beetles in pine bolts. Ann Ent Soc Amer 65:481–487Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. D. Paine
    • 1
  • M. C. Birch
    • 1
  • P. Švihra
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations