, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 22–31 | Cite as

Feeding patterns of monophagous, oligophagous, and polyphagous insect herbivores: The effect of resource abundance and plant chemistry

  • Rex G. Cates


Leaf tissue preferences of monophagous, oligophagous, and polyphagous insect herbivores were determined using young and mature leaf tissue abundances and herbivore feeding observations. Larvae of monophagous and oligophagous herbivores preferred young leaf tissues while, overall, larvae of polyphagous species preferred mature leaves of their various host plants. Even though a species is often polyphagous over its geographical range, larvae from local populations may be very specialized in their diet. When this occurs these specialized larvae prefer the more nutritious and perhaps more toxic young leaves of some of their host plants. Resource abundance and plant chemistry are discussed as major factors influencing herbivore feeding patterns.


Host Plant Leaf Tissue Local Population Young Leaf Geographical Range 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bailey, H., Simpson, B., Vervoorst, F.: The physical environment: The independent variable. In: Convergent evolution in warm deserts, US/IBP Synthesis Series 3 (G. Orians and O. Solbrig, eds.), pp. 14–49. Stroudsburg, Penn.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Inc. 1977Google Scholar
  2. Batzer, H., Millers, I.: Jack-pine budworm. USDA FS Forest Pest Leaflet 7, 1–4 (1970)Google Scholar
  3. Beckwith, R.: Influence of host foliage on the Douglas-fir tussock moth. Environ. Entomol. 5, 73–77 (1976)Google Scholar
  4. Beckwith, R.: The large aspen tortrix. USDA FS Forest Pest Leaflets 139, 1–5 (1973)Google Scholar
  5. Blau, P., Feeny, P., Contardo, L.: Allylglucosinolate and herbivorous caterpillars: A contrast in toxicity and tolerance. Science 200, 1296–1298 (1978)Google Scholar
  6. Beatley, J.: Rainfall and fluctuating plant populations in relation to distributions and numbers of desert rodents in Southern Nevada. Oecologia (Berl.) 24, 21–42 (1976)Google Scholar
  7. Berenbaum, M.: Toxicity of a furanocoumarin to armyworms: A case of biosynthetic escape from insect herbivores. Science 201, 532–534 (1978)Google Scholar
  8. Borror, D., DeLong, D.: An introduction to the study of insects, 812 pp. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1971Google Scholar
  9. Burnett, W., Jones, S.: Differential feeding of the southern armyworm on Kentucky and Florida populations of pokeweed. Amer. Midl. Nat. 90, 231–234 (1973)Google Scholar
  10. Cantino, P., Vervoorst, F.: The vascular plants of the eastern half of the Bolsón de Pipanaco, Argentina: An annotated list. Technical Report 74-15, Origin and Structure of Ecosystems IBPGoogle Scholar
  11. Cates, R., Rhoades, D.: Patterns in the production of antiherbivore chemical defenses in plant communities. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 5, 185–193 (1977a)Google Scholar
  12. Cates, R., Rhoades, D.: Prosopis leaves as a resource for insects. In: Mesquite: Its biology in two desert scrub ecosystems. US/IBP Synthesis Series 4 (B. Simpson, ed.), pp. 61–83. Stroudsburg, Penn.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Inc. 1977bGoogle Scholar
  13. Cates, R., Orians, G.: Successional status and the palatability of plants to generalized herbivores. Ecology 56, 410–418 (1975)Google Scholar
  14. Chapman, R.: The chemical inhibition of feeding by phytophagous insects: A review. Bull. Ent. Res. 64, 339–363 (1974)Google Scholar
  15. Cibula, A., Davidson, R., Fisk, F., LaPidus, J.: Relationship of free amino acids of some solanaceous plants to growth and development of Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 60, 626–631 (1967)Google Scholar
  16. Coyne, J.: Neodiprion taedae linearis: A sawfly pest of loblolly and shortleaf pines. USDA FS Forest Pest Leaflet 34, 1–4 (1970)Google Scholar
  17. Denton, R., Tunnock, S.: Larch casebearer in western larch forests. USDA FS Forest Pest Leaflets 96, 1–8 (1972)Google Scholar
  18. deWilde, H., Bongers, W., Schooneveld, H.: Effects of hostplant age on phytophagous insects. Ent. Exp. Appl. 12, 714–720 (1971)Google Scholar
  19. Drooz, A.: Larch sawfly. USDA FS Forest Pest Leaflet 8, 1–5Google Scholar
  20. Erickson, J., Feeny, P.: Sinigrin: A chemical barrier to the black swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polyxenes. Ecology 55, 103–111 (1974)Google Scholar
  21. Feeny, P.: Plant apparency and chemical defense. In: Biochemical interaction between plants and insects, (J. Wallace, R. Mansell, eds.) Rec. Adv. Phytochem. 10, 1–40. New York-London: Plenum Press 1976Google Scholar
  22. Feeny, P.: Seasonal changes in oak leaf tannins and nutrients as a cause of spring feeding by winter moth caterpillars. Ecology 51, 565–581 (1970)Google Scholar
  23. Fox, L., Macauley, B.: Insect grazing on Eucalyptus in response to variation in leaf tannins and nitrogen. Oecologia (Berl.) 29, 145–162 (1977)Google Scholar
  24. Franklin, R.: Insect influences on the forest canopy. In: Analysis of temperate forest ecosystems, Ecological studies 1 (D. Reichle, ed.), pp. 86–99. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer-Verlag 1970Google Scholar
  25. Furniss, R., Carolin, V.: Western forest insects, 654 pp. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office (1977)Google Scholar
  26. Futuyma, D., Gould, F.: Associations of plants and insects in a deciduous forest. Ecol. Monogr. 49, 33–50 (1979)Google Scholar
  27. Gray, J.: Host plant preference in two generalist herbivores. M.S. Thesis, pp. 36, University of New Mexico 1979Google Scholar
  28. Hanover, J.: Physiology of tree resistance to insects. Ann. Rev. Ent. 20, 75–95 (1975)Google Scholar
  29. Hard, J.: Budworm in coastal Alaska. J. Forestry 72, 26–31 (1974)Google Scholar
  30. Harley, K., Thorsteinson, J.: The influence of plant chemicals on the feeding behavior, development, and survival of the twostriped grasshopper, Melanoplus bivittatus (Say), Acrididae: Orthoptera. Canad. J. Zool. 45, 305–319 (1967)Google Scholar
  31. Hitchcock, C., Cronquist, A.: Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Seattle, Washington: University of Washington Press 1973Google Scholar
  32. Ikeda, T., Matsumura, F., Benjamin, D.: Chemical basis for feeding adaptation of pine sawflies Neodiprion rugifrons and Neodiprion swainei. Science 197, 497–499 (1977)Google Scholar
  33. Janzen, D.: Community structure of secondary compounds in plants. Pure Appl. Chem. 34, 529–538 (1973)Google Scholar
  34. Jennings, D.: Life history and habits of the southwestern pine tip moth, Rhyacionia neomexicana (Dyar) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Annals Entomol. Soc. Amer. 68, 597–606 (1975)Google Scholar
  35. Joern, A.: Feeding patterns in grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae): Factors influencing diet specialization. Oecologia (Berl.) 38, 325–347 (1979)Google Scholar
  36. Jones, S., Burnett, W., Coile, N., Mabry, T., Betkouski, M.: Sesquiterpene lactones of Vernonia — Influence of glaucolide-a on the growth rate and survival of lepidopterous larvae. Oecologia (Berl.) 39, 71–77 (1979)Google Scholar
  37. Kearney, T., Pebbles, R.: Arizona flora, 1085 pp. Berkeley: University of California Press 1969Google Scholar
  38. Kingsbury, J.: Poisonous plants of the United States and Canada, 626 pp. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1964Google Scholar
  39. Knerer, G., Atwood, C.: Diprionid sawflies: Polymorphism and speciation. Science 179, 1090–1099 (1973)Google Scholar
  40. Lukefahr, M., Joughtaling, J., Cruhm, D.: Suppression of Heliothis spp. with cotton containing combinations of resistant characters. J. Econ. Entomol. 68, 743–746 (1975)Google Scholar
  41. Martin, W., Hutchins, C.: A flora of New Mexico, 2600 pp. Braunschweig: Cramer-Verlag in pressGoogle Scholar
  42. Mason, R., Baxter, J.: Food preference in a natural population of the Douglas-fir tussock moth. J. Econ. Entomol. 63, 1257–1259 (1970)Google Scholar
  43. McGregor, M., Sandin, L.: Pinyon sawfly, Neodiprion edulicolus Ross. USDA FS Forest Pest Leaflets 117, 1–4 (1969)Google Scholar
  44. Miller, W., Hastings, A., Carolin, V.: European pine shoot moth. USDA FS Forest Pest Leaflets 59, 1–8 (1970)Google Scholar
  45. Morris, R.: Influence of parental food quality on the survival of Hyphantria cunea. Canad. Entomol. 99, 24–33 (1967)Google Scholar
  46. Morris, R.: The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Memoirs Entomol. Soc. Canad No. 31, 1–332 (1963)Google Scholar
  47. Munkata, K.: Insect antifeedants in plants. In: Control of insect behavior by natural products (D. Wood, R. Silverstein, M. Nakajima, eds.), pp. 179–187. New York-London: Academic Press 1970Google Scholar
  48. Murakoshi, S., Isogai, A., Chang, C., Kamikado, T., Sakurai, A., Tamura, S.: Effects of two components from the avocado leaves (Persea americana Mill.) and the related compounds on the growth of silkworm larvae, Bombyx mori L. Jap. J. Appl. Ent. Zool. 20, 87–91 (1976)Google Scholar
  49. Murakoshi, S., Kamikado, T., Chang, C., Sakurai, A., Tamura, S.: Effects of several components from the leaves of four species of plants on the growth of silkworm larvae, Bombyx mori L. Jap. J. Appl. Ent. Zool. 20, 26–30 (1976)Google Scholar
  50. Orians, G., Solbrig, O.: An evolutionary approach to ecosystems. In: Convergent evolution in warm deserts, US/IBP Synthesis Series 3 (G. Orians, O. Solbrig eds.), pp. 1–12, Strousburg: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Inc. 1977Google Scholar
  51. Rathcke, B.: Insect-plant patterns and relationships in the stem-boring guild. Amer. Midl. Nat. 96, 98–117 (1976)Google Scholar
  52. Rehr, S., Feeny, P., Janzen, D.: Chemical defense in Central American non-ant acacias. J. Animal. Ecol. 42, 405–416 (1973)Google Scholar
  53. Rehr, S., Janzen, D., Feeny, P.: L-dopa in legume seeds: A chemical barrier to insect attack. Science 181, 81–82 (1973)Google Scholar
  54. Rees, C.: Chemoreceptor specificity associated with choice of feeding site by the beetle, Chrysolina brunsvicensis on its foodplant, Hypericum hirsutum. Ent. Exp. and Appl. 12, 565–583 (1969)Google Scholar
  55. Reese, J., Beck, S.: Effects of allelochemics on the black cutworm, Agrotis ipsilon: Effects of p-benzoquinone, hydroquinone, and duroquinone on larval growth, development, and utilization of food. Annals. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 69, 59–67 (1976)Google Scholar
  56. Rhoades, D.: The antiherbivore chemistry of Larrea. In: Creosote bush: Biology and chemistry of Larrea in new world deserts, (T. Mabry, J. Hunziker, D. Diffeo, eds.), pp. 135–175. Strousburg: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Inc. 1977Google Scholar
  57. Rhoades, D., Cates, R.: Toward a general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry. In: Biochemical interaction between plants and insects, (J. Wallace, R. Mansell, eds.), Rec. Adv. Phytochem. 10, 168–213. New York-London: Plenum Press 1976Google Scholar
  58. Rockwood, L.: Seasonal changes in the susceptibility of Crescentia alata leaves to the flea beetle Oedionychus sp. Ecology 55, 142–148 (1974)Google Scholar
  59. Rosenthal, G., Dahlman, D., Janzen, D.: A novel means for dealing with L-Canavanine, a toxic metabolite. Science 192, 256–258 (1976)Google Scholar
  60. Shapiro, A.: The butterfly fauna of the Sacramento Valley, California. J. Res. Lepid., 73–82, 115–122, 137–148 (1974)Google Scholar
  61. Shaw, G., Little, C.: Effect of high urea fertilization of balsam fir trees on spruce budworm development. In: Insect and mite nutrition, (J. Rodriquez, ed.), pp. 589–597. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co. 1972Google Scholar
  62. Schmidt, W., Fellin, D.: Western spruce budworm damage effects form and height growth of western larch. Can. J. For. Res. 3, 17–26 (1973)Google Scholar
  63. Schoonhoven, L.: Some aspects of host selection and feeding in phytophagous insects. In: Insect and mite nutrition, (J. Rodriquez, ed.), pp. 557–566 (1972)Google Scholar
  64. Schiege, D., Crosby, D.: Black-headed budworm in western United States. USDA FS Forest Pest Leaflets 45, 1–4 (1970)Google Scholar
  65. Scriber, J., Feeny, P.: Growth of herbivorous caterpillars in relation to feeding specialization and to the growth form of their food plants. Ecology 60, 829–850 (1979)Google Scholar
  66. Smiley, J.: Plant chemistry and the evolution of host specificity: New evidence from Heliconius and Passiflora. Science 201, 745–747 (1978)Google Scholar
  67. Soo Hoo, C., Fraenkel, G.: The consumption, digestion, and utilization of food plants by a polyphagous insect, Prodenia eridania (Cramer). J. Insect Physiol. 12, 711–730 (1966)Google Scholar
  68. Stevens, R.: Pine needle-sheath miner. USDA FS Forest Pest Leaflets 65, 1–5 (1971)Google Scholar
  69. Stevens, R.: Ponderosa pine tip moth. USDA FS Forest Pest Leaflets 103, 1–5 (1971)Google Scholar
  70. Yates, H., Beal, R.: Nantucket pine tip moth. USDA FS Forest Pest Leaflets 70, 1–6 (1971)Google Scholar
  71. Varley, G., Gradwell, G.: Oak defoliators in England. Proc. Tenth Inter. Congr. Entomol. 4, 133–136 (1958)Google Scholar
  72. Wickman, B., Trostle, G., Buffam, P.: Douglas-fir tussock moth. USDA FS Forest Pest Leaflets 86, 1–6 (1971)Google Scholar
  73. Wilson, L.: Variable oak leaf caterpillar. USDA FS Forest Pest Leaflets 67, 1–3 (1971)Google Scholar
  74. Wilson, L.: Yellow-headed spruce sawfly. USDA FS Forest Pest Leaflets 69, 1–3 (1971)Google Scholar
  75. Wilson, L.: The red-headed pine sawfly. USDA FS Forest Pest Leaflets 14, 1–6 (1970)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rex G. Cates
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyThe University of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations