, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 18–21 | Cite as

Patterns of plant species diversity during succession under different disturbance regimes

  • Julie Sloan Denslow


I suggest that between-community variations in diversity patterns during succession in plant communities are due to the effects of selection on life history strategies under different disturbance regimes. Natural disturbances to plant communities are simultaneously a source of mortality for some individuals and a source of establishment sites for others. The plant community consists of a mosaic of disturbance patches (gaps) of different environmental conditions. The composition of the mosaic is described by the size-frequency distribution of the gaps and is dependent on the rates and scales of disturbance. The life-history strategies of plant species dependent on some form of disturbance for establishment of propagules should reflect this size-frequency distribution of disturbance patches. An extension of island biogeographic theory to encompass relative habitat area predicts that a community should be most rich in species adapted to growth and establishment in the spatially most common patch types. Changes in species diversity during succession following large scale disturbance reflect the prevalent life history patterns under historically common disturbance regimes. Communities in which the greatest patch area is in large-scale clearings (e.g. following fire) are most diverse in species establishing seedlings in xeric, high light conditions. Species diversity decreases during succession. Communities in which such large patches are rare are characterized by a large number of species that reach the canopy through small gaps and realtively few which regenerate in the large clearings. Diversity increases during succession following a large scale disturbance.

Evidence from communities characterized by different disturbance regimes is summarized from the literature. This hypothesis provides an evolutionary mechanism with which to examine the changes in plant community structure during succession. Diversity peaks occurring at “intermediate levels” of disturbance as discussed by Connell and Huston are interpreted in this context.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bard, G.E.: Secondary succession on the Piedmont of New Jersey. Ecol. Monogr. 22, 195–215 (1952)Google Scholar
  2. Bazzaz, F.A.: Plant species diversity in old field ecosystems in southern. Illinois. Ecology 56, 485–488 (1975)Google Scholar
  3. Braun, E.L.: Deciduous forests of Eastern North America. Philadelphia: Blakeston Co. 1950Google Scholar
  4. Chevalier, A.: L'extension et la régression de la fôret vierge de l'Afrique tropicale. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris 149, 458–461 (1909) Quoted in: The tropical rainforest (P.W. Richards). London: Cambridge University Press 1952Google Scholar
  5. Connell, J.H.: Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs. Science 199, 1302–1310 (1978)Google Scholar
  6. Denslow, J.S.: Secondary succession in a Colombian rainforest: Strategies of species response across a disturbance gradient. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin-Madison, U.S.A. (1978)Google Scholar
  7. Denslow, J.S.: Gap partitioning among tropical rainforest trees. Biotropica (in press)Google Scholar
  8. Dix, R.L., Swan, J.M.A.: The roles of disturbance and succession in upland forest at Candle Lake, Saskatchewan. Can. J. Bot. 49, 657–676 (1971)Google Scholar
  9. Drury, W.H., Nisbet, I.C.: Succession. J. Arnold Arbor. Harv. Univ. 54, 331–368 (1973)Google Scholar
  10. Gómez-Pompa, A.: Posible papel de la vegetación secundaria en la evolución de la flora tropical. Biotropica 3, 125–135 (1971)Google Scholar
  11. Grime, J.P.: Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Amer. Natur. 111, 1169–1194 (1977)Google Scholar
  12. Hartshorn, G.S.: Tree falls and tropical forest dynamics. In: Tropical trees as living systems (P.B. Tomlinson, M.H. Zimmermann, eds.), pp. 617–638. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press 1978Google Scholar
  13. Heinselman, M.L.: Fire in the virgin forests of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Minnesota. Quat. Res. 3, 329–382 (1973)Google Scholar
  14. Huston, M.: A general hypothesis of species diversity. Amer. Natur. 113, 81–101 (1979)Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, M.P., Mason, L.G., Raven, P.H.: Ecological parameters and plant species diversity. Amer. Natur. 102, 297–306 (1968)Google Scholar
  16. Keever, C.: Causes of succession on old fields of the Piedmont, North Carolina. Ecol. Monogr. 20, 229–250 (1950)Google Scholar
  17. Kellman, M.C., Adams, C.D.: Milpa weeds of Cayo District, Belize (British Hondurus). Can. Geogr. 14, 323–343 (1970)Google Scholar
  18. Loucks, O.L.: Evolution of diversity efficiency and community stability. Amer. Zool. 10, 17–25 (1970)Google Scholar
  19. MacArthur, R.H., Wilson, E.O.: The theory of island biogeography. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press 1967Google Scholar
  20. Margalef, R.: Perspectives in ecological theory. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press 1968Google Scholar
  21. Muller, C.H.: Plant succession in the Larrea-Flourensia climax. Ecology 21, 206–212 (1940)Google Scholar
  22. Muller, C.H.: Plant succession in arctic heath and tundra in northern Scandinavia. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 79, 296–309 (1952)Google Scholar
  23. Mutch, R.W.: Wildland fires and ecosystems— a hypothesis. Ecology 51, 1046–1051 (1970)Google Scholar
  24. Naveh, Z.: Mediterranean ecosystems and vegetation types in California and Israel. Ecology 48, 445–459 (1967)Google Scholar
  25. Odum, E.P.: Organic production and turnover in old field succession. Ecology 41, 34–49 (1960)Google Scholar
  26. Odum, E.P.: The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164, 262–270 (1969)Google Scholar
  27. Parsons, D.J.: The role of fire in natural communities: An example from the southern Sierra Nevada, California. Env. Conserv. 3, 91–99 (1976)Google Scholar
  28. Peet, R.K., Loucks, O.L.: A gradient analysis of Southern Wisconsin forests. Ecology 58, 485–499 (1977)Google Scholar
  29. Pickett, S.T.A.: Succession: An evolutionary interpretation. Amer. Natur. 110, 107–119 (1976)Google Scholar
  30. Pickett, S.T.A., Thompson, J.N.: Patch dynamics and the design of nature reserves. Biol. Conserv. 13, 27–38 (1978)Google Scholar
  31. Platt, W.J.: The colonization and formation of equilibrium plant species associations on badger disturbances in a tall grass prairie. Ecol. Monogr. 45, 285–395 (1975)Google Scholar
  32. Platt, W.J., Weis, J.M.: Resource partitioning and competition within a guild of fugitive prairie plants. Amer. Natur. 111, 479–513 (1977)Google Scholar
  33. Purdie, R.W., Slatyer, R.O.: Vegetation succession after fire in sclerophyll woodland communities in Southeastern Australia. Aust. J. Ecol. 1, 223–236 (1976)Google Scholar
  34. Ricklefs, R.E.: Environmental heterogeneity and plant species diversity: A hypothesis. Amer. Natur. 111, 376–381 (1977)Google Scholar
  35. Simpson, B.B.: Glacial migrations of plants: Island biogeographical evidence. Science 185, 698–700 (1974)Google Scholar
  36. Swain, A.M.: Enviornmental changes during the past 2,000 years in North Central Wisconsin: Analysis of pollen, charcoal, and seeds from varved lake sediments. Quat. Res. 10, 55–68 (1978)Google Scholar
  37. Terborgh, J.: On the notion of favorableness in plant ecology. Amer. Natur. 107, 481–501 (1973)Google Scholar
  38. Whitmore, T.C.: Tropical rainforests of the Far East. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1975Google Scholar
  39. Whittaker, R.H.: Communities and ecosystems. Second edition. New York: McMillan 1975Google Scholar
  40. Whittaker, R.H., Levin, S.A.: The role of mosaic phenomena in natural communities. Theor. Pop. Biol. 12, 117–139 (1977)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie Sloan Denslow
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations