The effects of insect visitors on nectar constituents in temperate plants
Article
Received:
- 115 Downloads
- 24 Citations
Summary
The floral nectar of angiosperms is primarily a solution of simple sugars, but contains detectable amounts of other solutes, particularly amino acids. These have been regarded as diagnostic, for phylogenetic and taxonomic purposes, and their mean concentrations may be significant in relation to the pollination syndrome of a plant species. However, in several temperate flowers the amino acid concentration varied by an order of magnitude when measured at intervals through a single day. In open, cup-shaped flowers, this was partly due to post-secretory equilibration with the varying humidity of the air. But the effects of floral visitation by insects on nectar amino acids were also important, both in open flowers and in those with long corollas and more enclosed nectar. Visitors could add amino acids to nectar by direct contact, by salivation, by damaging the neighbouring tissues causing cell leakage, and by dislodging pollen into the nectar; the importance of each of these effects varied according to corolla morphology and the spectrum of visitors.
Keywords
Sugar Acid Concentration Detectable Amount Open Flower Amino Acid Concentration
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Baker HG (1978) Chemical aspects of the pollination biology of woody plants in the tropics. In: PB Tomlinson & MH Zimmerman (ed) ‘Tropical Trees as living systems’. University Press, Cambridge, pp 57–82Google Scholar
- Baker HG, Baker I (1973a). Amino acids in nectar and their evolutionary significance. Nature Lond 241:543–545Google Scholar
- Baker HG, Baker I (1973b). Some anthecological aspects of the evolution of nectar producing flowers, particularly amino acid production in nectar. In: VH Heywood (ed), ‘Taxonomy and Ecology’ Academic Press, New York p 243–264Google Scholar
- Baker HG, Baker I (1975). Studies of nectar constitution and pollinatorplant coevolution. In: ‘Coevolution of animals and plants’ LE Gilbert and PH Raven (ed). Univ. of Texas Press, Austin and London, p 100–140Google Scholar
- Baker HG, Baker I (1977) Intraspecific constancy of floral nectar amino acid complements. Bot Gaz 138:183–191Google Scholar
- Baker I, Baker HG (1976) Analyses of amino acids in flower nectars of hybrids and their parents, with phylogenetic implications. New Phytol 76:87–98Google Scholar
- Beutler R (1953) Nectar. Bee World 34:106–116, 128–136, 156–162Google Scholar
- Boetius J (1948) Über den Verlauf der Nektarabsonderung einiger Blütenpflanzen. Beih Sweiz Bienenzeitung 2:257–317Google Scholar
- Bünning E (1959) Die seismonastischen Reaktionen. In: W Ruhland (ed) Handbuch der Pflanzenphysiologie. Vol 17 1 Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 184–238Google Scholar
- Corbet SA, Unwin DM, Prŷs-Jones OE (1979) Humidity, nectar and insect visits to flowers with special reference to Crataegus, Tilia and Echium. Ecol Ent 4:9–22Google Scholar
- Corbert SA, Willmer PG Regulating nectar sugar concentrations in a humid climate. In prepGoogle Scholar
- Corbet SA, Willmer PG, Beament JWL, Unwin DM, Prŷs-Jones OE (1979) Post-secretory determinants of sugar concentration in nectar. Plant Cell and Environment 2:293–308Google Scholar
- Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1979). The principles of Pollination Ecology. 3rd ed Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Free JB (1968) The behaviour of bees visiting runner beans (Phaseolus multiflorus). J Appl Ecol 5:631–638Google Scholar
- Gilbert LE (1972) Pollen feeding and reproductive biology of Heliconius butterflies. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 69:1403–1407Google Scholar
- Heinrich B, Raven PH (1972) Energetics and pollination ecology. Science 176:597–602Google Scholar
- Huber H (1956) Die Abhängigkeit der Nektarsekretion von Temperatur, Luft- und Bodenfeuchtigkeit. Planta 48:47–98Google Scholar
- Kenoyer LA (1917) Environmental influences on nectar secretion. Bot Gaz 63:249–265Google Scholar
- Kumazawa M (1936) Pollen grain morphology in Ranunculaceae, Lardizabalaceae and Berberidaceae. Jap J Bot 8:19–46Google Scholar
- Linskens HF, Schrauwen J (1969) The release of free amino acids from germinating pollen. Acta Bot Neerl 18:605–614Google Scholar
- Lüttge H (1977) Nectar composition and membrane transport of sugars and amino acids: a review on the present state of nectar research. Apidologie 8:305–319Google Scholar
- Macior L (1966) Foraging behaviour of Bombus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in relation to Aquilegia pollination. Am J Bot 53:302–309Google Scholar
- Maier CT, Waldbauer GP (1979) Diurnal activity patterns of flower flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in an Illinois sand area. Ann Ent Soc Am 72:237–245Google Scholar
- Oertel E (1946) Effect of temperature and relative humidity on sugar concentration of nectar. J Econ Ent 39:513–515Google Scholar
- Park OW (1929) The influence of humidity upon sugar concentration in the nectar of various plants. J Econ Ent 22:534–544Google Scholar
- Percival MS (1965) Floral Biology. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Pesti J (1976) Daily fluctuations in the sugar content of nectar and periodicity of secretion in the Compositae. Acta Agro Acad Sci Hung 25:5–17Google Scholar
- Proctor M, Yeo PF (1973) The Pollination of Flowers. Collins, New NaturalistGoogle Scholar
- Sibaoka T (1969) Physiology of rapid movements in higher plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 20:165–184Google Scholar
- Stanley RG, Linskens HF (1975) Pollen: Biology, Biochemistry. Management. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Unwin DM (1979) In: Corbet, Unwin und Prŷs-Jones Ecol Ent 4:9–22Google Scholar
- Willmer PG, Corbet SA Temporal and microclimatic partitioning of the floral resources of Justicia aurea amongst a concourse of pollen vectors and nectar thieves. Submitted to EcologyGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag 1980