Marine Biology

, Volume 121, Issue 2, pp 327–334 | Cite as

Morphology, fluid motion and predation by the scyphomedusa Aurelia aurita

  • J. H. Costello
  • S. P. Colin


Although medusan predators play demonstrably important roles in a variety of marine ecosystems, the mechanics of prey capture and, hence, prey selection, have remained poorly defined. A review of the literature describing the commonly studied medusa Aurelia aurita (Linnaeus 1758) reveals no distinct patterns of prey selectivity and suggests that A. aurita is a generalist and feeds unselectively upon available zooplankton. We examined the mechanics of prey capture by A. aurita using video methods to record body and fluid motions. Medusae were collected between February and June in 1990 and 1991 from Woods Hole, Massachusetts and Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, USA. Tentaculate A. aurita create fluid motions during swimming which entrain prey and bring them into contact with tentacles. We suggest that this mechanism dominates prey selection by A. aurita. In this case, we predict that medusae of a specific diameter will positively select prey with escape speeds slower than the flow velocities at their bell margins. Negatively selected prey escape faster than the medusan flow velocity draws them to capture surfaces. Faster prey will be captured by larger medusac because flow field velocity is a function of bell diameter. On the basis of prey escape velocities and flow field velocities of A. aurita with diameters of 0.8 to 7.1 cm, we predict that A. aurita will select zooplankton such as barnacle nauplii and some slow swimming hydromedusae, while faster copepods will be negatively selected.


Flow Velocity Flow Field Field Velocity Distinct Pattern Marine Ecosystem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bailey KM, Batty RS (1983). A laboratory study of predation by Aurelia aurita on larval herring (Clupea harengus): experimental observations compared with model predictions. Mar Biol 72: 195–301Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, KM, Houde KM (1989) Predation on eggs and larvae of marine fishes and the recruitment problem. Adv mar Biol 25:1–83Google Scholar
  3. Bamstedt U (1990) Trophodynamics of the scyphomedusa Aurelia aurita. Predation rate in relation to abundance, size and type of prey organism. J Plankton Res 12:215–229Google Scholar
  4. Brewer RH (1989) The annual pattern of feeding, growth and sexual reproduction in Cyanea (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa) in the Niantic River Estuary, CT. Biol Bull mar biol Lab, Woods Hole 176:272–281Google Scholar
  5. Costello JH (1992) Foraging energetics in hydromedusae. Sci Mar 56:185–191Google Scholar
  6. Costello JH, Marrase C, Strickler JR, Zeller R, Freise AJ, Trager G (1990) Grazing in a turbulent environment: I. Behavioral response of a calanoid copepod, Centropages hamatus. Proc natn Acad Sci USA 87:1648–1652Google Scholar
  7. Daniel TL (1983) Mechanics and energetics of medusan jet propulsion. Can J Zool 61:1406–1420Google Scholar
  8. Daniel TL (1985) Cost of locomotion: unsteady medusan swimming. J exp Biol 119:149–164Google Scholar
  9. de Lafontaine Y, Leggett EC (1988) Predation by jellyfish on larval fish: an experimental evaluation employing in situ enclosures. Can J Fish aquat Sciences 45:1173–1190Google Scholar
  10. Fancett MS (1988) Diet and prey selectivity of scyphomedusae from Port Phillip Bay, Australia. Mar Biol 98:503–509Google Scholar
  11. Fraser JH (1969) Experimental feeding of some medusae and chaetognaths. J Fish Res Bd Can 26:1743–1762Google Scholar
  12. Gamble JC, Hay SJ (1989) Predation by the scyphomedusan Aurelia aurita on herring larvae in large enclosures: effects of predator size and prey starvation. Rapp P-v Réun Cons int Explor Mer 191:366–375Google Scholar
  13. Haury LR, Kenyon DE, Brooks JR (1980) Experimental evaluation of the avoidance reaction of Calanus finmarchicus. J Plankton Res 2:187–202Google Scholar
  14. Heeger T, Moller H (1987) Ultrastructural observations on prey capture and digestion in the scyphomedusa Aurelia aurita. Mar Biol 96:391–400Google Scholar
  15. Huntley ME, Hobson LA (1987) Medusa predation and plankton dynamics in a temperate fjord, British Columbia. J Fish Res Bd Can 34:73–82Google Scholar
  16. Hwang J-S, Costello JH, Strickler JR (1994) Copepod grazing in a turbulent flow: elevated foraging behavior and habituation of escape responses. J Plankton Res 16:421–431Google Scholar
  17. Leonard JL (1982) Transient rhythms in the swimming activity of Sarsia tubulosa (Hydrozoa). J exp Biol 96:181–193Google Scholar
  18. Lindahl O, Hernroth L (1983) Phyto-zooplankton community in coastal waters of western Sweden — an ecosystem off balance? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 10:119–126Google Scholar
  19. Madin LP (1988) Feeding behavior of tentaculate predators: in situ observations and a conceptual model. Bull mar Sci 43:413–129Google Scholar
  20. Matsakis S, Conover RS (1991) Abundance and feeding of medusae and their potential impact as predators on other zooplankton in Bedford Basin (Nova Scotia, Canada) during Spring. Can J Fish aquat Sciences 48:1419–1430Google Scholar
  21. Marrase C, Costello JH, Strickler JR (1990) Grazing in a turbulent environment: II. Energy dissipation, encounter rates and efficacy of feeding currents in Centropages hamatus. Proc natn Acad Sci USA. 87:1653–1657Google Scholar
  22. Mills CB (1981) Diversity of swimming behaviors in hydromedusae as related to feeding and utilization of space. Mar Biol 64: 185–189Google Scholar
  23. Moller H (1980a) Scyphomedusae as predators and food competitors of larval fish. Meeresforsch 28:90–100Google Scholar
  24. Moller H (1980b) Population dynamics of Aurelia aurita medusae in Kiel Bight, Germany (FGR). Mar Biol 60:123–128Google Scholar
  25. Moller H (1984) Reduction of a larval herring population by a jelly-fish predator. Science, NY 224:621–622Google Scholar
  26. Ortin JH (1922) The mode of feeding of the jelly-fish Aurelia aurita, on the smaller organisms of the plankton. Nature, Lond 110:178–179Google Scholar
  27. Purcell JE (1985) Predation on fish eggs and larvae by pelagic cnidarians and ctenophores. Bull mar Sci 37:739–755Google Scholar
  28. Purcell JE (1991) A review of cnidarians and ctenophores feeding on cempetitors in the plankton. Hydrobiologia 216:335–342Google Scholar
  29. Purcell JE, Mills CE (1988) The correlation between nematocyst types and diets in pelagic hydrozoa. In: Hessinger DA, Lenhoff H (eds) The biology of nematocysts. Academic Press, New York, pp 463–485Google Scholar
  30. Southward AJ (1955) Observations on the ciliary currents of the jellyfish Aurelia aurita L. J mar biol Ass UK 34:201–216Google Scholar
  31. Stoecker DK, Michaels AE, Davis LH (1987) Grazing by the jellyfish Aurelia aurita, on microzooplankton. J Plankton Res 9: 901–915Google Scholar
  32. Sullivan BK, Garcia JR, Klein-MacPhee G (1994) Prey selection by the scyphomedusan predator Aurelia aurita. Mar Biol 121:335–341Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. Costello
    • 1
  • S. P. Colin
    • 1
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentProvidence CollegeProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations