Oecologia

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 371–376 | Cite as

Relationships between growth, photosynthesis and competitive interactions for a C3 and C4 plant

  • Robert W. Pearcy
  • Nina Tumosa
  • Kimberlyn Williams
Article

Summary

The relationships of photosynthetic characteristics to the competitive interactions of a C3 plant, Chenopodium album, and a C4 plant, Amaranthis retroflexus, were investigated in different temperature and water supply regimes. Both species had similar photosynthetic rates at 25°C, but at higher temperatures, Amaranthus had substantially greater rates than Chenopodium. Conversely, at lower temperatures, Chenopodium had an advantage. The competitive abilities in mixtures exhibited a close parallel to the photosynthetic performances with Amaranthus having an advantage at high temperatures and Chenopodium an advantage at low temperatures. These competitive outcomes were determined primarily by differences in relative growth rates prior to canopy closure. In the respective, temperature regimes, the species having the highest photosynthetic rate, which resulted an more rapid growth, overtopped and shaded the other species at the time of canopy closure. These results demonstrate that differences in photosynthetic temperature response between C4 and C3 plants can be an important determinant in competitive interactions, but at least in this case, the influence is primarily through, events prior to the actual initiation of competition.

In contrast to temperature, growth of the plants under limited water supply had no influence on the competitive interactions. Thus, the presence of the C4 pathway alone was not sufficient to yield a competitive advantage over the C3 species under water limited conditions.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baskin JM, Baskin CC (1978) A discussion, of the growth and competitive ability of C3 and C4 plants. Castanea 43:71–76Google Scholar
  2. Bjorkman O (1973) Comparative studies on photosynthesis in higher plants. In: Photophysiology AC Giese (ed), Vol 8 Academic Press, New York London, p 1–63Google Scholar
  3. Bjorkman O (1975), Environmental and biological control of photosynthesis: Inaugural address. In: R Marcelle (ed) Environmental and biological control of photosynthesis. Dr W Junk The Hague, p 1–16Google Scholar
  4. Black CC (1971) Ecological implications of dividing plants into groups with distinct photosynthetic production capacities. Adv Ecol Res 7:87–114Google Scholar
  5. Black CC, Chen TM, Brown RH (1969) Biochemical basis for plant competition. Weed Sci 17:338–344Google Scholar
  6. Bull TA (1969) Photosynthetic efficiencies and photorespiration in Calvin cycle and C4 dicarboxylic acid plants. Crop Sci 9:726–729Google Scholar
  7. Clements FE, Weaver JE, Hanson HC (1929) Plant competition. Carnegie Inst Wash WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen D (1970) The expected efficiency of water utilization in plants under different competition, and selection regimes. Israel J Bot 19:50–54Google Scholar
  9. Downes RW (1969) Differences in transpiration rates between tropical and temperate grasses under controlled conditions. Planta 88:261–273Google Scholar
  10. Ehleringer JR (1978) Implications of quantum yield differences on the distributions of C3 and C4 grasses. Oecologia (Berl) 31:255–267Google Scholar
  11. Ehleringer JR, Bjorkman O (1977) Quantum yields for CO2 uptake in C3 and C4 plants. Dependence on temperature, CO2 and O2 concentration. Plant Physiol 59:86–90Google Scholar
  12. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press. New York LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Hofstra JJ, Stienstra AW (1977) Growth and photosynthesis of closely related C4 grasses as influenced by light intensity and water supply. Acta Bot Neerl 26:63–72Google Scholar
  14. Jarvis P (1971) The estimation of resistances to carbon dioxide transfer. In: Plant photosynthetic production: Manual of methods. Z Sestak, J Catsky, PG Jarvis (eds) Junk The Hague p 566–631Google Scholar
  15. Ludlow MM (1976) Ecophysiology of C4 grasses In: OL Lange, L Kappen, ED Schulze (eds) Water and plant life. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 364–386Google Scholar
  16. Osmond CB, Troughton JH, Goodchild DJ (1969) Physiological, biochemical, and structural studies of photosynthesis and photorespiration in two species of Atriplex. Z. Pflanzenphysiol 61:218–237Google Scholar
  17. Patterson DT (1976) C4 photosynthesis in smooth pigweed. Weed Sci 24:127–130Google Scholar
  18. Pearcy RW (1976) Temperature responses of growth and photosynthetic CO2 exchange rates in coastal and desert races of Atriplex, lentiformis. Oecologia (Berl) 26:245–255Google Scholar
  19. Ross MA, Harper JL (1972) Occupation of biological space during seedling establishment J Ecol 60:77–88Google Scholar
  20. Slatyer RO (1970) Comparative photosynthesis, growth and transpiration of two species of Atriplex. Planta 93:175–189Google Scholar
  21. Teeri JA (1979) The climatology of the C4 photosynthetic pathway. In: Topics in plant population biology. OT Solbrig, S Jain, GB Johnson, PH Raven (eds) Columbia Univ Press New York, p 356–374Google Scholar
  22. Teeri JA, Stowe LG (1976) Climatic patterns and the distribution of C4 grasses in North America. Oecologia (Berl) 23:1–12Google Scholar
  23. de Wit CT (1960) On competition Versl Landbouwk Onderz 66:1–82Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert W. Pearcy
    • 1
  • Nina Tumosa
    • 1
  • Kimberlyn Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.Dept. of Biological SciencesThe University at AlbanyAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations