Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 21–25 | Cite as

The effect of the predator-avoidance behavior of the sea urchin, Centrostephanus coronatus, on the breadth of its diet

  • R. R. Vance
  • R. J. Schmitt
Article

Summary

The sea urchin, Centrostephanus coronatus, exhibits a relatively broad diet. Evidence presented in this paper suggests that evolution of dietary breadth is favored by two mechanisms. First, individual urchins occur in habitat types that support somewhat different foods. Urchins consume principally the most preferred food where it is common but are forced to eat other food types where it is rare. Second, overgrazing by individual urchins reduces the local abundance of the most preferred food, thereby forcing them to add less preferred items to their diet. Previous work indicates that the escape behavior of Centrostephanus from its fish predator, Pimelometopon pulchrum, results in different individuals being exposed to different foods and in reduction of the size of urchin grazing ranges to the point that overgrazing occurs. Hence, by the two mechanisms discussed in this paper, the presence of the fish predator favors the broad diet of its sea urchin prey.

Keywords

Habitat Type Prefer Food Fish Predator Food Type Escape Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Breen, P.A., Mann, K.K.: Changing lobster abundances and the destruction of kelp beds by sea urchins. Mar. Biol. 34, 137–141 (1976)Google Scholar
  2. Dayton, P.K.: Experimental evaluation of ecological dominance in a rocky intertidal algal community. Ecol. Monogr. 45, 137–159 (1975)Google Scholar
  3. Dix, T.G.: Biology of Evechinus chloroticus (Echinoidea: Echinometridae) from different localities: I. General. New Zealand J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 4, 91–116 (1970)Google Scholar
  4. Elmhirst, R.: Habits of Echinus esculentus. Nature, Lond. 110, 667 (1972)Google Scholar
  5. Estes, J.A., Palmisano, J.F.: Sea otters: their role in structuring nearshore communities. Science 185, 1058–1060 (1974)Google Scholar
  6. Estes, J.A., Smith, N.S., Palmisano, J.F.: Sea otter predation and community organization in the western Aleutian Islands, Alaska. Ecology 59, 822–833 (1978)Google Scholar
  7. Fuji, A.: Ecological studies on the growth and food consumption of Japanese common littoral sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius (A. Agassiz). Mem. Fac. Fish., Hokkaido University. 15, 83–160 (1967)Google Scholar
  8. Glynn, P.W., Wellington, G.M., Birkeland, C.: Coral reef growth in the Galapagos: limitation by sea urchins. Science 203, 43–49 (1979)Google Scholar
  9. Herring, P.J.: Observations on the distribution and feeding habits of some littoral echinoids from Zanzibar. J. Nat. Hist. 6, 169–175 (1972)Google Scholar
  10. Ivlev, V.S.: Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes, 302 pp. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1961Google Scholar
  11. Jones, N.S., Kain, J.M.: Subtidal algal colonization following removal of Echinus. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters. 15, 460–466 (1967)Google Scholar
  12. Lawrence, J.M.: On the relationships between marine plants and sea urchins. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 13, 213–286 (1975)Google Scholar
  13. Levins, R.: Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explorations, 120 pp. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1968Google Scholar
  14. Lewis, J.B.: Feeding and digestion in the tropical sea urchin Diadema antillarum Philippi. Canadian J. Zool. 42, 549–557 (1964)Google Scholar
  15. Lowry, L.F., Pearse, J.S.: Abalones and sea urchins in an area inhabited by sea otters. Mar. Biol. 23, 213–219 (1973)Google Scholar
  16. Nelson, B.V., Vance, R.R.: Diel foraging patterns of the sea urchin, Centrostephanus coronatus, as a predator avoidance strategy. Mar. Biol. 51, 251–258 (1979)Google Scholar
  17. Palmisano, J.F., Estes, J.A.: Sea otters: pillars of the nearshore community. Natural History 85(7), 46–53 (1976)Google Scholar
  18. Pearse, J.S.: A monthly reproductive rhythm in the diadematid sea urchin Centrostephanus coronatus Verrill. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 8, 167–186 (1972)Google Scholar
  19. Pearse, J.S., Hines, A.H.: Expansion of a central California kelp forest following the mass mortality of sea urchins. Mar. Biol. 51, 83–91 (1979)Google Scholar
  20. Vadas, R.L.: Preferential feeding: an optimization strategy in sea urchins. Ecol. Monogr. 47, 337–371 (1977)Google Scholar
  21. Vance, R.R.: A mutualistic interaction between a sessile marine clam and its epibionts. Ecology 59, 679–685 (1978)Google Scholar
  22. Vance, R.R.: Effects of grazing by the sea urchin Centrostephanus coronatus, on prey community composition. Ecology 60, 537–546 (1979)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. R. Vance
    • 1
  • R. J. Schmitt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations