Estimation of the total surface area in Indian elephants (Elephas maximus indicus)
- 233 Downloads
Twenty-four adult Indian elephants (Elephas maximus indicus) of both sexes and different ages and weights, belonging to the Temple Devaswoms, the Forest Department of the Government of Kerala and the Gemini Circus formed the experimental subjects from which formulae were derived to predict the total surface area from either body measurements or areas of individual regions. Several models, using the parameters studied either singly or in combination, were tried independently for males and females and also for adults irrespective of sex. The best prediction of total surface area (S) in m2 was obtained for adults irrespective of sex by using the two parameters, the height at the shoulders (H) in m and forefoot pad circumference (FFC) in m in the formula S=−8.245+6.807H+7.073FFC. No significant improvement in the accuracy of prediction resulted from the use of the independent best fit formulae for males and females. The conventional method of using the exponential of body weight (kg) for predicting suface area was not found to yield an equivalent accuracy in these animals.
Keywordsbiometry elephant surface area
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Benedict, F.G., 1936. The Physiology of the Elephant (Carnegie Institute, Washington)Google Scholar
- Cena, K. and Clark, J.A., 1981. Bioengineering, Thermal Physiology and Comfort (Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, New York)Google Scholar
- Dale, H.E., 1984. Energy metabolism. In: M.J.Swenson (ed.), Duke's Physiology of Domestic Animals, 10th edn. (Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press, London)Google Scholar
- Dukes, H.H., 1955. The Physiology of Domestic Animals, 7th edn. (Bailière, Tindall and Cox, London)Google Scholar
- Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G., 1967. Statistical Methods (Oxford & IBH Publishing Co., Calcutta)Google Scholar
- Sreekumar, K.P. and Nirmalan, G., 1989. Estimation of body weight in Indian elephants (Elephas maximus indicus). Veterinary Research Communications, 13, 3–9Google Scholar