Marine Biology

, Volume 125, Issue 2, pp 385–399

The Mytilus edulis species complex in southwest England: effects of hybridization and introgression upon interlocus associations and morphometric variation

  • J. P. A. Gardner


Loglinear analysis of electrophoretic data from two hybrid Mytilus edulis x galloprovincialis populations in southwest England revealed non-significant associations between genotypes at four allozyme loci, each of which is partially diagnostic for differences between the two taxa. Significant non-random genotypic associations within the context of the non-significant model involved all four assayed loci equally, consistent with their occurrence in a relatively tight linkage group. Multivariate analyses were used to examine electrophoretic variation from the two hybrid populations, and morphometric variation in the hybrid populations and in four allopatric (two M. edulis and two M. galloprovincialis) populations from western Europe While the number of hybrid mussels is high at both sites (22% at Croyde, 53% at Whitsand) the two taxa have largely maintained the genetic differences which exist between them in allopatry. However, morphological differences between the taxa have been eroded for mussels within the hybrid zone, whereas these differences are quite pronounced for mussels from allopatric populations. It is proposed that each taxon within the genus maintains its genetic identity, despite high dispersal potential, widespread hybridization, and high levels of introgression, as a result of adaptation to different environments. The worlwide occurrence of all four Mytilus hybrid zones at ecotones between recognized biogeographical provinces which are characterized by differences in temperature and salinity is consistent with such an interpretation.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnold J (1993) Cytonuclear disequilibria in hybrid zones. A Rev Ecol Syst 24:521–554Google Scholar
  2. Barton NH, Bengtsson BO (1986) The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridizing populations. Heredity, Lond 56:357–376Google Scholar
  3. Barton NH, Hewitt GM (1983) Hybrid zones as barriers to gene flow. Protein polymorphism: adaptive and taxonomic significance. In: Oxford GS, Rollinson D (eds) Systematics Association Special Volume No. 24. Academic Press, London and New York, pp 341–359Google Scholar
  4. Barton NH, Hewitt GM (1985) Analysis of hybrid zones. A Rev Ecol Syst 16:113–148Google Scholar
  5. Barton NH, Hewitt GM (1989) Adaptation, speciation and hybrid zones. Nature, Lond 341:497–503Google Scholar
  6. Battaglia B (1957) Ecological differentiation and incipient intraspecific isolation in marine copepods. Annėe biol 33: 259–268Google Scholar
  7. Beaumont AR (1994) Linkage studies in Mytilus edulis, the mussel. Heredity, Lond 72: 557–562Google Scholar
  8. Beaumont AR, Seed R, Garcia-Martinez P (1989) Electrophoretic and morphometric criteria for the identification of the mussels Mytilus edulis and M. galloprovincialis. Proc. 23rd Eur mar Biol Symp 1: 251–258 [Ryland JS, Tyler PA (eds) Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark]Google Scholar
  9. Briggs JC (1974) Marine zoogeography. McGraw-Hill, New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Bulnheim H-P, Gosling EM (1988) Population genetic structure of mussels from the Baltic Sea. Helgoländer Meeresunters 42: 113–129Google Scholar
  11. Campton DE (1987) Natural hybridization and introgression in fishes. In: Ryman N, Utter F (eds) Population genetics and fishery management. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington, pp 161–192Google Scholar
  12. Camptor DE, Utter FM (1985) Natural hybridization between steelhead trout (Salmo gairdneri) and coastal cutthroat trout (Salmo clarki clarki) in two Puget Sound streams. Can J Fish aquat Sciences 42: 110–119Google Scholar
  13. Coustau C, Renaud F, Delay B (1991a) Genetic characterization of the hybridization between Mytilus edulis and M. galloprovincialis on the Atlantic coast of France. Mar Biol 111: 87–93Google Scholar
  14. Coustau C, Renaud F, Maillard C, Pasteur N, Delay B (1991b) Differential susceptibility to a trematode parasite among genotypes of the Mytilus edulis/galloprovincialis complex. Genet Res 57: 207–212Google Scholar
  15. Gardner JPA (1992) Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lmk) (Bivalvia, Mollusca): the taxonomic status of the Mediterranean mussel. Ophelia 35: 219–243Google Scholar
  16. Gardner JPA (1994) The structure and dynamics of naturally occurring hybrid Mytilus edulis Linnaeus, 1758 and Mytilus galloprovincialis Lamarck, 1819 (Bivalvia: Mollusca) populations: review and interpretation. Arch Hydrobiol (Suppl 99. Monogr Beitr): 99: 37–71Google Scholar
  17. Gardner, JPA (1995) Developmental stability is not disrupted by extensive hybridization and introgression among populations of the marine bivalve molluscs Mytilus edulis (L.) and M. galloprovincialis (Lmk.) from south-west England. Biol J Linn Soc 54: 71–86Google Scholar
  18. Gardner JPA, Skibinski DOF (1988) Historical and size-dependent genetic variation in hybrid mussel populations. Heredity, Lond 61: 93–105Google Scholar
  19. Gardner JPA, Skibinski DOF (1990) Genotype-dependent fecundity and temporal variation of spawning in hybrid mussel (Mytilus) populations. Mar Biol 105: 153–162Google Scholar
  20. Gardner JPA, Skibinski DOF (1991a) Mitochondrial DNA and allozyme covariation in a hybrid mussel population. J exp mar Biol Ecol 149: 45–54Google Scholar
  21. Gardner JPA, Skibinski DOF (1991b) Biological and physical factors influencing genotype-dependent mortality in hybrid mussel populations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 71: 235–243Google Scholar
  22. Gardner JPA, Skibinski DOF, Bajdik CD (1993) Shell growth and mortality differences between the marine mussels Mytilus edulis (L.), Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lmk.) and their hybrids from two sympatric populations in S.W. England. Biol Bull mar biol Lab, Woods Hole 185: 405–416Google Scholar
  23. Gosling EM (1984) The systematic status of Mytilus galloprovincialis in western Europe: a review. Malacologia 25: 551–568Google Scholar
  24. Gosling EM, Wilkins NP (1981) Ecological genetics of the mussels Mytilus edulis and Mytilus galloprovincialis on Irish coasts. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 4: 221–227Google Scholar
  25. Harrison RG (1990) Hybrid zones: windows on evolutionary process. Oxf Surv Evolut Biol 7: 69–128Google Scholar
  26. Happer BT (1957) Notes on Mytilus galloprovincialis LAMARCK in Great Britain. J mar biol Ass UK 36: 33–40Google Scholar
  27. Hewitt GM (1988) Hybrid zones — natural laboratories for evolutionary studies. Trends Ecol Evolut 3: 158–167Google Scholar
  28. Hilbish TJ, Bayne BL, Day A (1994) Genetics of physiological differentiation within the marine mussel genus Mytilus. Evolution 48: 267–286Google Scholar
  29. Koehn RK (1991) The genetics and taxonomy of species in the genus Mytilus. Aquaculture, Amsterdam 94: 125–145Google Scholar
  30. Lamb T, Avise JC (1987) Morphological variability in genetically defined categories of anuran hybrids. Evolution 41: 157–165Google Scholar
  31. Mayer MS, Mesler MR (1993) Morphometric evidence of hybrid swarms in mixed populations of Polystichum munitum and P. imbricans (Dryoperidaceae). Syst Bot 18: 248–260Google Scholar
  32. McDonald JH, Seed R, Koehn RK (1991) Allozymes and morphometric characters of three species of Mytilus in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, Mar Biol 111: 323–333Google Scholar
  33. Nason JD, Ellstrand NC, Arnold ML (1992) Patterns of hybridization and introgression in populations of oaks, manzanitas, and irises. Am J Bot 79: 101–111Google Scholar
  34. Sarver SK, Foltz DW (1993) Genetic population structure of a species' complex of blue mussels (Mytilus spp.) Mar Biol 117: 105–112Google Scholar
  35. Sarver SK, Loudenslager EJ (1991) The genetics of California populations of the blue mussel: further evidence for the existence of electrophoretically distinguishable species or subspecies. Biochem Syst Ecol 19: 183–188Google Scholar
  36. SAS Institute Inc (1987) SAS/STAT guide for personal computers. Release 6.03 edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USAGoogle Scholar
  37. Seed R (1992) Systematics, evolution and distribution of mussels belonging to the genus Mytilus: an overview. Am malac Bull 9: 123–137Google Scholar
  38. Skibinski DOF (1983) Natural selection in hybrid mussel populations. In: Oxford GS, Rollinson D (eds) Protein polymorphism: adaptive and taxonomic significance. Systematics Association Special Volume No. 24. Academic Press, London and New York, pp 283–298Google Scholar
  39. Skibinski DOF, Beardmore JA, Cross TF (1983) Aspects of the population genetics of Mytilus (Mytilidae: Mollusca) in the British Isles. Biol J Linn Soc 19: 137–183Google Scholar
  40. Skibinski DOF, Cross TF, Ahmad M (1980) Electrophoretic investigation of relationships in the marine mussels Modiolus modiolus L., Mytilus edulis L., and Mytilus galloprovincialis Lmk. Biol J Linn Soc 13: 65–73Google Scholar
  41. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (1989) Using multivariate statistics. 2nd edn. Harper & Row, New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Tedengren M, Andre C, Johannesson K, Kautsky N (1990) Genotypic and phenotypic differences between Baltic and North Sea populations of Mytilus edulis evaluated through reciprocal transplantations. III. Physiology. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 59: 221–227Google Scholar
  43. Väinölä R, Hvilsom MM (1991) Genetic divergence and a hybrid zone between Baltic and North Sea Mytilus populations (Mytilidae: Mollusca). Biol J Linn Soc 43: 127–148Google Scholar
  44. Varvio S-L, Koehn RK, Väinölä R (1988) Evolutionary genetics of the Mytilus edulis complex in the North Atlantic region. Mar Biol 98: 51–60Google Scholar
  45. Willis GL, Skibinski DOF (1992) Variation in strength of attachment to the substrate explains differential mortality in hybrid mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis and M. edulis) populations. Mar Biol 112: 403–408Google Scholar
  46. Wolf HG, Mort MA (1986) Inter-specific hybridization underlies phenotypic variability in Daphnia populations. Oecologia 68: 507–511Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. P. A. Gardner
    • 1
  1. 1.Island Bay Marine Laboratory, School of Biological SciencesVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations