, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 1–16

Predation intensity in a rocky intertidal community

Relation between predator foraging activity and environmental harshness
  • Bruce A. Menge


Knowledge of predation intensity and how and why it varies among communities appears to be a key to understanding of community regulation. Along the rocky shores of New England, predation intensity in the mid intertidal zone appears to be low with exposure to severe wave shock, low desiccation stress, and a sparse cover of canopy algae, and high at areas protected from waves, with high desiccation potential and a dense cover of algae. As a result, predators at exposed headlands have no controlling influence on community structure, while at protected sites, they exert a strong and controlling effect on community structure.

Experimental-observational studies of the effects of wave shock and desiccation on survival, foraging range and activity of the primary predator in this community (Thais lapillus) indicate that:
  1. (1)

    wave shock is a continuous and actual source of mortality at exposed sites but is relatively unimportant at protected sites;

  2. (2)

    mortality rates from desiccation at protected sites are potentially high and greater than at exposed sites; however,

  3. (3)

    actual desiccation stress is greatly reduced at protected sites by a dense algal canopy;

  4. (4)

    mortality from desiccation is greater in the higher mid intertidal than in the lower mid intertidal.


Comparisons of activity patterns of Thais from April through November (these snails are usually active from May to early October) at an exposed and a protected site suggest snails at the former site restrict their active feeding to crevices while those at the latter site forage throughout the habitat. Field experiments support this hypothesis. Hence, differences in predator effectiveness at exposed and protected communities are probably due in part to the influence of wave shock. Exposed areas receive frequent severe wave shock in all seasons, even summer. Thus, the risk of being swept off the shore for snails foraging away from the shelter of a crevice at such areas is apparently great and exerts a strong selective force on foraging range. The importance of waves as a selective agent is further reinforced by the fact that crevices are nearly barren of prey, while just a few cm beyond the limits of the crevice, prey occur in great abundance.

In contrast, at protected sites wave shock is never as severe as at exposed sites and is a relatively minor factor among several which might affect the foraging activity of a Thais. A major factor which varies among protected sites is the algal canopy. The influence of this factor is considered in a companion paper.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anonymous: Local climatological data for Boston, Mass. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Environmental Data Service (1965–1975)Google Scholar
  2. Connell, J.H.: Effects of competition, predation by Thais lapillus, and other factors on natural populations of the barnacle Balanus balanoides. Ecol. Monogr. 31, 61–104 (1961a)Google Scholar
  3. Connell, J.H.: The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology 42, 710–723 (1961b)Google Scholar
  4. Connell, J.H.: A predator-prey system in the marine intertidal region. I. Balanus glandula and several predatory species of Thais. Ecol. Monogr. 40, 49–78 (1970)Google Scholar
  5. Connell, J.H.: On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees. Proc. Advance. Stud. Inst., Dynamics Numbers Pop. 1970, 298–312 (1971)Google Scholar
  6. Connell, J.H.: Some mechanisms producing structure in natural communities. In: Ecology and evolution of communities (M.L. Cody, J.M. Diamond, eds.), pp. 460–490. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press 1975Google Scholar
  7. Dayton, P.K.: Competition, disturbance, and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecol. Monogr. 41, 351–389 (1971)Google Scholar
  8. Dayton, P.K.: Experimental evaluation of ecological dominance in a rocky intertidal algal community. Ecol. Monogr. 45, 137–159 (1975)Google Scholar
  9. Dodson, S.I.: Complementary feeding niches sustained by size-selective predation. Limnol. Oceanogr 15, 131–137 (1970)Google Scholar
  10. Dodson, S.I.: Adaptive change in plankton morphology in response to size-selective predation: a new hypothesis of cyclomorphosis. Limnol. Oceanogr. 19, 721–729 (1974a)Google Scholar
  11. Dodson, S.I.: Zooplankton competition and predation: an experimental test of the size-efficiency hypothesis. Ecology 55, 605–613 (1974b)Google Scholar
  12. Glynn, P.W.: Mass mortalities of echinoids and other reef flat organisms coincident with midday, low water exposures in Puerto Rico. Mar. Biol. 1, 226–243 (1968)Google Scholar
  13. Harger, J.R.E.: The effect of wave impact on some aspects of the biology of sea mussels. The Veliger 12, 401–414 (1970)Google Scholar
  14. Harger, J.R.E., Landenberger, D.E.: The effect of storms as a density dependent mortality factor on populations of sea mussels. The Veliger 14, 195–201 (1971)Google Scholar
  15. Harper, J.L.: The role of predation in vegetational diversity. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 22, 48–61 (1969)Google Scholar
  16. Hatton, H.: Essais de bionomie explicative sur quelques especes intercotidales d'algues et d'animaux. Ann. Inst. Monaco 17, 241–348 (1938)Google Scholar
  17. Huffaker, C.B.: Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27, 343–383 (1958)Google Scholar
  18. Janzen, D.H.: Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. Am. Natur. 104, 501–528 (1970)Google Scholar
  19. Kensler, C.B.: Desiccation resistance of intertidal crevice species as a factor in their zonation. J. Anim. Ecol. 36, 391–406 (1967)Google Scholar
  20. Kohn, A.J.: Environmental complexity and species diversity in the gastropod genus Conus on Indo-West Pacific reef platforms. Am. Natur. 101, 251–260 (1967)Google Scholar
  21. Kohn, A.J., Leviten, P.J.: Effect of habitat complexity on population density and species richness in tropical intertidal predatory gastropod assemblages. Oecologia (Berl.) 25, 199–210 (1976)Google Scholar
  22. Levin, S.A., Paine, R.T.: Disturbance, patch formation, and community structure. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., U.S. 71, 2744–2747 (1974)Google Scholar
  23. Lewis, J.R.: The ecology of rocky shores, pp. 323. London: English Universities Press 1964Google Scholar
  24. Loucks, O.L.: Evolution of diversity, efficiency, and community stability. Am. Zool. 10, 17–25 (1970)Google Scholar
  25. Lubchenco, J. (formerly Menge, J. Lubchenco): Plant species diversity in a marine intertidal community: importance of herbivore food preference and algal competitive abilities. Am. Natur. 112, (in press, 1978)Google Scholar
  26. Lubchenco, J., Menge, B.A.: Community development and persistence in a low rocky intertidal zone. Ecol. Monogr. (in press, 1978)Google Scholar
  27. MacArthur, R.H.: Geographical ecology, 269 pp. New York: Harper and Row 1972Google Scholar
  28. MacArthur, R.H., MacArthur, J.W.: On bird species diversity. Ecology 42, 594–598 (1961)Google Scholar
  29. Menge, B.A.: Foraging strategy of a starfish in relation to actual prey availability and environmental predictability. Ecol. Monogr. 42, 25–50 (1972)Google Scholar
  30. Menge, B.A.: Ecological implications of patterns of rocky intertidal community structure and behavior along an environmental gradient. In: Ecology of fouling communities (J.D. Costlow, ed.), pp. 155–180. Washington D.C.: Office of Naval Research Printing Office 1976aGoogle Scholar
  31. Menge, B.A.: Organization of the New England rocky intertidal community: role of predation, competition and environmental heterogeneity. Ecol. Monogr. 46, 355–393 (1976b)Google Scholar
  32. Menge, B.A.: Predation intensity in a rocky intertidal community. Effect of an algal canopy, wave action and desiccation on predator feeding rates. Oecologia (Berl.) 34, 17–35 (1978)Google Scholar
  33. Menge, B.A., Sutherland, J.P.: Species diversity gradients: synthesis of roles of predation, competition, and temporal heterogeneity. Am. Natur. 110, 351–369 (1976)Google Scholar
  34. Menge, J.L.: Effect of herbivores on community structure of the New England rocky intertidal region: distribution, abundance and diversity of algae. Ph. D. Thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. (1975)Google Scholar
  35. Moore, H.B.: The biology of Purpura lapillus. Part 1. Shell variation in relation to the environment. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 21, 61–89 (1936)Google Scholar
  36. Murdoch, W.W.: Switching in general predators: experiments on predator specificity and stability of prey populations. Ecol. Monogr. 39, 335–354 (1969)Google Scholar
  37. Murdoch, W.W., Oaten, A.: Predation and population stability. Adv. Ecol. Res. 9, 1–131 (1975)Google Scholar
  38. Oaten, A., Murdoch, W.W.: Functional response and stability in predator-pray systems. Am. Natur. 109, 289–298 (1975a)Google Scholar
  39. Oaten, A., Murdoch, W.W.: Switching, functional response, and stability in predator-prey systems. Am. Natur. 109, 299–318 (1975b)Google Scholar
  40. Osborne, C.: Ecology of shell color polyphenism in Thais lapillus. Ph. D. Thesis, Yale University, New Haven, Conn., 337 pp. (1977)Google Scholar
  41. Osman, R.W.: The establishment and development of a marine epifaunal community. Ecol. Monogr. 47, 37–63 (1977)Google Scholar
  42. Paine, R.T.: Food web complexity and species diversity. Am. Natur. 100, 65–75 (1966)Google Scholar
  43. Paine, R.T.: The Pisaster-Tegula interaction: prey patches, predator food preference and intertidal community structure. Ecology 50, 950–961 (1969)Google Scholar
  44. Paine, R.T.: A short-term experimental investigation of resource partitioning in a New Zealand rocky intertidal habitat. Ecology 52, 1096–1106 (1971)Google Scholar
  45. Paine, R.T.: Intertidal community structure. Experimental studies on the relationship between a dominant competitor and its principal predator. Oecologia (Berl.) 15, 93–120 (1974)Google Scholar
  46. Paine, R.T.: Size-limited predation: an observational and experimental approach with the Mytilus-Pisaster interaction. Ecology 57, 858–873 (1976)Google Scholar
  47. Pianka, E.R.: On lizard species diversity: North American flatland deserts. Ecology 48, 333–351 (1967)Google Scholar
  48. Roth, R.R.: Spatial heterogeneity and bird species diversity. Ecology 57, 773–782 (1976)Google Scholar
  49. Southward, A.J.: The population balance between limpets and seaweeds on wave-beaten rocky shores. Rep. Mar. Biol. Sta. Pt. Erin, No. 8, 20–29 (1956)Google Scholar
  50. Staiger, H.: Genetical and morphological variation in Purpura lapillus with respect to local and regional differentiation of population groups. Annee Biol. 33, 251–258 (1957)Google Scholar
  51. Sprules, W.G.: Effects of size-selective predation and food competition on high altitude zooplankton communities. Ecology 53, 375–386 (1972)Google Scholar
  52. Taylor, D.L.: Some ecological implications of forest fire control in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. Ecology 54, 1394–1396 (1973)Google Scholar
  53. Ware, D.M.: Predation by rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri): the influence of hunger, prey density, and prey size. J. Fish. Res. Board Canada 29, 1193–1201 (1972)Google Scholar
  54. Wiens, J.A.: Pattern and process in grassland bird communities. Ecol. Monogr. 43, 237–270 (1973)Google Scholar
  55. Wiens, J.A.: Habitat heterogeneity and avian community structure in North American grasslands. Am. Midl. Nat. 91, 195–213 (1974a)Google Scholar
  56. Wiens, J.A.: Climatic instability and the “ecological saturation” of bird communities in North American grasslands. The Condor 76, 385–400 (1974b)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce A. Menge
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations