Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 320–324 | Cite as

Population structure of pierid butterflies IV. Genetic and physiological investment in offspring by male Colias

  • Carol L. Boggs
  • Ward B. Watt
Article

Summary

Population structure encompasses all the rules by which a population's gametes come together, including genetic and physiological investment in offspring. We document female use of nutrients donated by males at mating, and complete sperm precedence, in Colias eurytheme Boisduval. The effect of these phenomena on the population structure of this species is discussed.

Keywords

Population Structure Sperm Precedence Pierid Butterfly Complete Sperm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bell WJ, Bohm MK (1975) Oosorption in insects. Biol Rev 50:373–396Google Scholar
  2. Boggs C (1981) Selection pressures affecting male nutrient investiment at mating in heliconiine butterflies. Evolution in pressGoogle Scholar
  3. Boggs C, Gilbert L (1979) Male contribution to egg production in butterflies: evidence for transfer of nutrients at mating. Science 206:83–84Google Scholar
  4. Bray GA (1960) A simple efficient liquid scintillator for counting aqueous solutions in a liquid scintillation counter. Anal Biochem 1:279–285Google Scholar
  5. Burns JM, Johnson FM (1967) Esterase polymorphism in natural populations of a sulfur butterfly, Colias eurytheme. Science 156:93–96Google Scholar
  6. Descimon H (1966) Variations quantitatives des ptérines de Colias croceus (Foureroy) et leur signification dans la biosynthèse de ptérines. C.R. Hebd Acad Sci 262:390–393Google Scholar
  7. Dunlap-Pianka H, Boggs C, Gilbert L (1977) Ovarian dynamics in heliconiine butterflies: Programmed senescence versus eternal youth. Science 197:487–490Google Scholar
  8. Fisher R (1958) The genetical theory of natural selection. 2nd ed. New York: DoverGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedel T, Gillot C (1977) Contribution of male-produced proteins to vitellogenesis in Melanoplus sanguinipes. J Insect Physiol 23:145–151Google Scholar
  10. Gerould JH (1911) The inheritance of polymorphism and sex in Colias philodice. Am Natur 45:257–283Google Scholar
  11. Gerould JH (1923) Inheritance of white wing color, a sex-limited (sex-controlled) variation in yellow pierid butterflies. Genetics 8:495–557Google Scholar
  12. Goss G (1977) The interaction between moths and pyrrolizidine alkaloid-containing plants including nutrient transfer via the spermatophore in Lymire edwardsii (Ctenuchidae). Ph.D. diss. Univ of MiamiGoogle Scholar
  13. Graham S, Watt WB, Gall LF (1980) Metabolic resource allocation vs. mating attractiveness: adaptive pressures on the “alba” polymorphism of Colias butterflies. Proc Natl. Acad Sci USA 71:3615–3619Google Scholar
  14. Labine P (1964) Population biology of the butterfly Euphydryas editha. I. Barriers to multiple inseminations. Evolution 18:335–336Google Scholar
  15. Lorkovicz Z, Herman C (1961) The solution of a long outstanding problem in the genetics of dimorphism in Colias. J Lepid Soc 15:43–55Google Scholar
  16. Pianka ER (1976) Natural selection of optimal reproductive tactics. Amer Zool 16:775–784Google Scholar
  17. Remington C (1954) The genetics of Colias (Lepidoptera). Adv in Genet 6:403–450Google Scholar
  18. Rothschild D (1974) An investigation of the reproductive strategy of Colias butterflies. Senior Honors Thesis. Stanford University.Google Scholar
  19. Rutowski R (1979) The butterfly as an honest salesman. Anim Behav 27:1269–1270Google Scholar
  20. Sims S (1979) Aspects of mating frequency and reproductive maturity in Papilio zelicaon. Am Midl Nat 102:36–50Google Scholar
  21. Stern VM, Smith RF (1960) Factors affecting egg production and oviposition in populations of Colias philodice eurytheme Boisduval. (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Hilgardia 29:411–454Google Scholar
  22. Tabashnik B (1980) Population structure of pierid butterflies. III. Pest populations of Colias philodice eriphyle. Oecologia (Berl) 47:175–183Google Scholar
  23. Watt WB (1973) Adaptive significance of pigment polymorphisms in Colias butterflies. III. Progress in the study of the “alba” variant. Evolution 27:537–548Google Scholar
  24. Watt WB (1977) Adaptation at specific loci. I. Natural selection on phosphoglucose isomerase of Colias butterflies: biochemical and population aspects. Genetics 87:177–194Google Scholar
  25. Watt WB, Hoch PC, Mills SG (1974) Nectar resource use by Colias butterflies: chemical and visual aspects. Oecologia (Berl) 14:353–374Google Scholar
  26. Watt WB, Chew FS, Snyder LRG, Watt AG, Rothschild DE (1977) Population structure of pierid butterflies. I. Numbers and movements of some montane Colias species. Oecologia (Berl) 27:1–22Google Scholar
  27. Watt WB, Han D, Tabashnik B (1979) Population structure of pierid butterflies. II. A “native” population of Colias philodice eriphyle in Colorado. Oecologia (Berl) 44:44–52Google Scholar
  28. Wright S (1946) Isolation by distance under diverse systems of mating. Genetics 31:39–59Google Scholar
  29. Wright S (1951) The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eugenics 15:323–354Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol L. Boggs
    • 1
  • Ward B. Watt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations