Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 185–202 | Cite as

An experimental evaluation of competition between three species of intertidal prosobranch gastropods

  • A. J. Underwood
Article

Summary

Previous investigations have shown that competition for space among sessile organisms in rocky intertidal communities is often reduced by predation or harsh environmental factors. Grazing gastropods are unlikely to compete for space, but at high densities might compete for food, unless some factor, such as predation, reduced the densities. The coexisting species of herbivourous gastropods on rock-platforms in New South Wales are not, however, subject to high levels of predation on shores sheltered from waveaction. In this study, three of these species were caged at densities from the natural, to 4 times the natural density on the shore, in different combinations of species, to investigate their competitive interactions. All three species, Nerita atramentosa, Bembicium nanum and the limpet Cellana tramoserica, showed increased mortality and reduced weight at increased density, over 100- or 200-day periods. The effect of high density on Cellana was greater than on Nerita or on Bembicium. In addition, Nerita was competitively superior to the other two species. Cellana, at high densities, adversely affected Bembicium. Nerita was not affected by high densities of either of the other two species, and Cellana was not affected by Bembicium.

Under entirely natural conditions, the effects of increased density of Cellana on the mortality and tissue-weight of Bembicium could not occur, because of the high rate of mortality of Cellana when at increased density of its own species. The other effects of increased density of snails would, however, occur. Thus, there can be regulation of numbers of snails because of high densities of their own or other species on the shore.

The supply of benthic, microalgal food is proposed as the limiting resource for which the species compete. Hypotheses are proposed to account for the mechanisms by which the three species acquire different amounts of the resource. These are based on aspects of the feeding biology of the snails.

The continued coexistence, in intertidal regions, of Cellana, which shows the highest rate of mortality due to members of its own species, with the competitively dominant Nerita, which increases the mortality of Cellana, is apparently due to three factors. These are:
  1. (i)

    the presence of subtidal refuges for breeding populations of Cellana,

     
  2. (ii)

    regular spatial dispersion of Cellana which would probably decrease intraspecific competition for food, and

     
  3. (iii)

    the high variability in space and time of recruitment of planktonic larvae of both Cellana and Nerita.

     

This last factor makes it unlikely that high densities of Nerita could occur on all shores in every year. Cellana could always recolonize any area where its density had previously been reduced, and thus, cannot be excluded by competitive interactions. Competitive interactions at high densities of gastropods can therefore cause reductions in the number of each species present on a shore. They cannot, however, lead to exclusion of any species or alter the composition of the community of herbivores on the shore.

The difference between competition for space by sessile intertidal organisms, and competition for food by gastropods which graze on microalgae is discussed with respect to the structure of intertidal communities. In the former case, competitively dominant species must be dislodged from the resource, space, by disturbance (e.g. predation or hazards) before recolonization by inferior competitors can occur. In the latter situation, the food resource is renewable without further perturbation of the community, and the competitively dominant species could never consume it completely over a wide enough area, and for a sufficient length of time, to eliminate totally another species.

Keywords

Microalgae Dominant Species Competitive Interaction Intraspecific Competition Spatial Dispersion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Branch, G.M.: Mechanisms reducing intraspecific competition in Patella spp.: migration, differentiation and territorial behaviour. J. Anim. Ecol. 44, 575–600 (1975)Google Scholar
  2. Connell, J.H.: Effects of competition, predation by Thais lapillus, and other factors on natural populations of the barnacle Balanus balanoides. Ecol. Monogr. 31, 61–104 (1961a)Google Scholar
  3. Connell, J.H.: The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology 42, 710–723 (1961b)Google Scholar
  4. Connell, J.H.: A predator-prey system in the marine intertidal region. I. Balanus glandula and several predatory species of Thais. Ecol. Monogr. 40, 49–78 (1970)Google Scholar
  5. Connell, J.H.: Field experiments in marine ecology. In: Experimental marine biology (R. Mariscal, ed.), pp. 21–54. New York: Academic Press 1974Google Scholar
  6. Connell, J.H.: Some mechanisms producing structure in natural communities. In: Ecology and evolution of communities (M.L. Cody, J.M. Diamond, eds.), pp. 460–491 Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1975Google Scholar
  7. Dayton, P.K.: Competition, disturbance, and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecol. Monogr. 41, 351–389 (1971)Google Scholar
  8. Haven, S.B.: Competition for food between the intertidal gastropods Acmaea scabra and A. digitalis. Ecology 54, 143–151 (1973)Google Scholar
  9. Loosanoff, V.L.: Variations in time and intensity of setting of the starfish Asterias forbesi in Long Island Sound during a twenty five year period. Biol. Bull. 126, 423–439 (1964)Google Scholar
  10. Loosanoff, V.L.: Time and intensity of setting of the oyster Crassostrea virginica in Long Island Sound. Biol. Bull. 130, 211–227 (1966)Google Scholar
  11. Mackay, D.A., Underwood, A.J.: Experimental studies on homing in the intertidal patellid limpet Cellana tramoserica (Sowerby). Oecologia (Berl.) 30, 215–237 (1977)Google Scholar
  12. May, V., Bennett, I., Thompson, T.E.: Herbivore-algal relationships on a coastal rock platform (Cape Banks, N.S.W.). Oecologia (Berl.) 6, 1–14 (1970)Google Scholar
  13. Menge, B.A.: Competition for food between two intertidal starfish species and its effect on body size and feeding. Ecology 53, 635–644 (1972)Google Scholar
  14. Menge, B.A., Sutherland, J.P.: Species diversity gradients: synthesis of the roles of predation, competition, and temporal heterogeneity. Am. Nat. 110, 351–369 (1976)Google Scholar
  15. Paine, R.T.: Food web complexity and species diversity. Am. Nat. 100, 65–75 (1966)Google Scholar
  16. Sale, P.F.: Maintenance of high diversity in coral reef fish communities. Am. Nat. 111, 337–359 (1977)Google Scholar
  17. Spight, T.M.: On a snail's chances of becoming a year old. Oikos 16, 9–14 (1975)Google Scholar
  18. Stimson, J.: The role of the territory in the ecology of the intertidal limpet Lottia gigantea (Gray). Ecology 54, 1020–1030 (1973)Google Scholar
  19. Underwood, A.J.: Comparative studies on the biology of Nerita atramentosa Reeve, Bembicium nanum (Lamarck) and Cellana tramoserica (Sowerby) (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia) in S.E. Australia. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 18, 153–172 (1975a)Google Scholar
  20. Underwood, A.J.: Intertidal zonation of prosobranch gastropods: analysis of densities of four coexisting species. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 19, 197–216 (1975b)Google Scholar
  21. Underwood, A.J.: Food competition between age-classes in the intertidal neritacean Nerita atramentosa Reeve (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia). J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 23, 145–154 (1976a)Google Scholar
  22. Underwood, A.J.: Analysis of patterns of dispersion of intertidal prosobranch gastropods in relation to macro-algae and rock-pools. Oecologia (Berl.) 25, 145–154 (1976b)Google Scholar
  23. Underwood, A.J.: Nearest-neighbour analyses of patterns of dispersion of intertidal prosobranch gastropods. Oecologia (Berl.) 26, 257–266 (1976c)Google Scholar
  24. Underwood, A.J.: Movements of intertidal gastropods. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 26, 191–201 (1977)Google Scholar
  25. Winer, B.J.: Statistical principles in experimental design 2nd ed. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha 1971Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. J. Underwood
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoology Building, School of Biological SciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations