Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 107–115 | Cite as

Longevity of needle fascicles of Pinus longaeva (Bristlecone pine) and other North American pines

  • Frank W. Ewers
  • Rudolf Schmid
Article

Summary

Variation in leaf longevity of gymnosperms has received surprisingly little attention despite its likely adaptive significance. Pinus longaeva, a pine of arid, subalpine environments in the western United States, has the record among conifers for needle longevity, with a maximum dwarf shoot (needle fascicle) retention time of up to about 45 years. Most low elevation pines have dwarf shoot retention times (DSRs) of two to four years. Literature data for the 37 species of Pinus native to the United States and Canada and field data for eight taxa (21 populations) of pines growing at various elevations in California each show a strong positive correlation between elevation and DSR, respectively, r=+0.65, df=35, p<0.001 and r=+0.82; df=19, p<0.001. We propose that extended needle fascicle longevity represents an adaptation to arid and especially high elevation environments. Field data from native stands and common gardens indicate that differences between taxa in DSR relate to both genetic and environmental factors. When grown at the same sites certain species (eg, P. longaeva, P. monophylla) had much longer DSRs than others, indicating a genetic basis for differences in needle fascicle longevity. For six of seven taxa that were each studied at more than one elevation there was a statistically significant increase in DSR in going from the lowest to the highest elevation site, indicating strong environmental control of needle fascicle longevity.

The physiological control of dwarf shoot senescence and abscission is poorly understood. For P. longaeva dwarf shoots of a particular age class are not shed simultaneously; rather there is a more or less gradual attrition of dwarf shoots from the long shoot. Although different types of long shoots of pines are known to differ physiologically, for P. longaeva there was no consistent difference in DSR on various types of lateral long shoots (eg, vegetative, pollen cone-bearing, seed cone-bearing), nor was there a statistically significant difference in DSR on trunks versus on their lateral long shoots. In addition, for P. contorta ssp. bolanderi and P. muricata needle fascicle longevity was not affected by the degree of edaphically induced dwarfing (ie, stunting) of the trees.

Keywords

High Elevation Strong Positive Correlation Common Garden Native Stand Elevation Site 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrams L (1923) Illustrated flora of the Pacific states: Washington, Oregon, and California, vol 1. Stanford University Press, Stanford [1940 edition with minor corrections]Google Scholar
  2. Bailey DK (1970) Phytogeography and taxonomy of Pinus subsection Balfourianae. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 57:210–249Google Scholar
  3. Barnard C (1926) Preliminary note on branch fall in the Coniferales. Proc Linn Soc New South Wales 51:114–128Google Scholar
  4. Bornman CH (1978) Welwitschia: Paradox eines verdorrten Paradieses/paradox of a parched paradise. C Struik Publishers, Cape Town [dual German-English text]Google Scholar
  5. Britton NL [assited by JA Shafer] (1908) North American trees. Henry Holt and Co. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Collingwood GH, Brush WD (1974) Knowing your trees. Revised and edited by D Butcher. American Forestry Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  7. Critchfield WB (1957) Geographic variation in Pinus contorta. Maria Moors Cabot Foundation Publ 3:i-vii, 1–118Google Scholar
  8. Cronquist A, Holmgren AH, Holmgren NH, Reveal JL (1972) Intermountain flora: vascular plants of the intermountain west, U.S.A., vol. 1. Hafner Publishing Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Doak CC (1935) Evolution of foliar types, dwarf shoots, and cone scales of Pinus. Illinois Biol Monogr 13(3):1–106Google Scholar
  10. Dochinger LS, Heck WW (1969) An ozone-sulfur dioxide synergism produces symptoms of chlorotic dwarf of eastern white pine. Phytopathology 59:399 (abstract)Google Scholar
  11. Eames AJ, MacDaniels LH (1947) An introduction to plant anatomy, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Book Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Elliott JH (1937) The development of the vascular system in evergreen leaves more than one year old. Ann Bot NS 1:107–127Google Scholar
  13. Ewers FW, Schmid R (1978) The long-term changes in the anatomy of needles of Pinus longaeva (bristlecone pine). Bot Soc Amer Misc Ser, Publ 156:74 (abstract)Google Scholar
  14. Ferguson CW (1968) Bristlecone pine: science and esthetics. Science 159:839–846Google Scholar
  15. Frank AB (1864) Ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Gefäßbündel. Bot Zeit 22:149–154, 157–162, 165–172, 177–182, 185–188, 377–394, 397–403, 405–414 [see especially p 185–188]Google Scholar
  16. Freeland RO (1952) Effect of age of leaves upon the rate of photosynthesis in some conifers. Plant Physiol 27:685–690Google Scholar
  17. Fritts HC (1969) Bristlecone pine in the White Mountains of California: growth and ring-width characteristics. Pap Lab Tree-ring Res Univ Arizona 4:i-viii, 1–44Google Scholar
  18. Green GR (1933) Trees of North America (exclusive of Mexico), vol 1. Edwards Brothers, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  19. Grime JP (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Amer Naturalist 111:1169–1194Google Scholar
  20. Harada H, Sanada M, Fujimura Y, Watanabe T, Takahashi K, Ohtomo R, Otomo R (1973) Unusual shedding of needles and growth stagnation of young Pinus strobus planted in the immature soil area of Tarumae (preliminary report). Ann Rep Hokkaido Branch, Gov For Exp Sta 1972:48–59 [in Japanese, English summary]Google Scholar
  21. Harlow WM (1935) The dendrology of the more important trees of the United States, part 2, 3rd edn. Edwards Brothers, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  22. Harlow WM, Harrar ES (1979) Textbook of dendrology, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill Book Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoff RJ, McDonald GI, Bingham RT (1976) Mass selection for blister rust resistance: a method for natural regeneration of western white pine. USDA For Serv Res Note INT-202:1–11Google Scholar
  24. Jepson WL (1923) The trees of California, 2nd edn. The author, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  25. Kimura M (1963) Dynamics of vegetation in relation to soil development in northern Yatsugatake Mountains. Jap J Bot 18:225–287Google Scholar
  26. Kohyama T (1980) Growth pattern of Abies mariesii saplings under conditions of open-growth and suppression. Bot Mag Tokyo 93:13–24Google Scholar
  27. Kozlowski TT (1971) Growth and development of trees, vol 1. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. LaMarche VC Jr (1974) Paleoclimatic inferences from long tree-ring records. Science 183:1043–1048Google Scholar
  29. Little EL Jr, Critchfield WB (1969) Subdivisions of the genus Pinus (pines). USDA For Serv Misc Publ 1144:i-iv, 1–51Google Scholar
  30. Lloyd RM, Mitchell RS (1973) A flora of the White Mountains, California and Nevada. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  31. Longman KA, Wareing PF (1958) Effect of gravity on flowering and shoot growth in Japanese larch (Larix leptolepis, Murray). Nature 182:380–381Google Scholar
  32. Lumis GP, Hofstra G, Hall R (1973) Sensitivity of roadside trees and shrubs to aerial drift of deicing salt. HortScience 8:475–477Google Scholar
  33. McMillan C (1956) The edaphic restriction of Cupressus and Pinus in the Coast Ranges of central California. Ecol Monogr 26:177–212Google Scholar
  34. Mann LK, McLaughlin SB, Shriner DS (1980) Seasonal physiological responses of white pine under chronic air pollution stress. Environ Exp Bot 20:99–105Google Scholar
  35. Mastrogiuseppe RJ, Mastrogiuseppe JD (1980) A study of Pinus balfouriana Grev. & Balf. (Pinaceae). Syst Bot 5:86–104Google Scholar
  36. Meehan T (1869) Sexual law in the Coniferæ. Proc Acad Nat Sci Philadelphia 21:121–122Google Scholar
  37. Miller PR, Parmeter JR Jr, Taylor OC, Cardiff EA (1963) Ozone injury to the foliage of Pinus ponderosa. Phytopathology 53:1072–1076Google Scholar
  38. Millington WF, Chaney WR (1973) Shedding of shoots and branches. In: Kozlowski TT (ed) Shedding of plant parts. Academic Press, New York, p 149–204Google Scholar
  39. Mirov NT (1967) The genus Pinus. Ronald Press Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Molisch H (1938) The longevity of plants. Translated from the German by EH Fulling. Published by the Translator, New York. [German edition 1929: Die Lebensdauer der Pflanze.]Google Scholar
  41. Mooney HA (1973) Plant communities and vegetation. In: Lloyd and Mitchell (1973), p 7–17Google Scholar
  42. Mooney HA, West M, Brayton R (1966). Field measurements of the metabolic responses of bristlecone pine and big sagebrush in the White Mountains of California. Bot Gaz 127:105–113Google Scholar
  43. Munz PA [in collaboration with DD Keck] (1959) A California flora. University of California Press, Berkeley [with 1968 supplement by PA Munz]Google Scholar
  44. Napp-Zinn K (1966) Anatomie des Blattes, I, Blattanatomie der Gymnospermen. In: K Linsbauer's Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie, 2 Aufl, Bd 8 Tl1. Gebrüder Borntraeger, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  45. Owens JN, Molder M (1977) Development of long-shoot terminal buds of western white pine (Pinus monticola). Can J Bot 55:1308–1321Google Scholar
  46. Preston RJ Jr (1976) North American trees, 3rd edn. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
  47. Sargent CS (1897) The silva of North America, vol. 11. Houghton, Mifflin & Co, Boston. [1947 reprint by Peter Smith, New York]Google Scholar
  48. Sargent CS (1922) Manual of the trees of North America (exclusive of Mexico), 2nd edn. Houghton Mifflin Co, BostonGoogle Scholar
  49. Schmid R, Schmid MJ (1975) Living links with the past. Nat Hist 84(3):38–45Google Scholar
  50. Schutz CJ, Wingfield MJ (1979) A health problem in mature stands of Pinus taeda in the eastern Transvaal. S African For J 109:47–49Google Scholar
  51. Shaw GR (1907) Characters of Pinus: the lateral cone. Bot Gaz 43:205–209Google Scholar
  52. Shaw GR (1914) The genus Pinus. Publ Arnold Arbor 5:1–96Google Scholar
  53. Sudworth GB (1908) Forest trees of the Pacific slope. US Government Printing Office, Washington [1967 reprint by Dover Publications, New York]Google Scholar
  54. Tison A (1902–1904) Les traces foliares des Conifères dans leur rapport avec d'épaississement de la tige. Mém Soc Linn Normandie 21:57–82Google Scholar
  55. Wareing PF (1958) Reproductive development in Pinus sylvestris. In: Thimann KV (ed) The physiology of forest trees. The Ronald Press Co, New York, p 643–654Google Scholar
  56. Weidman RH (1939) Evidences of racial influence in a 25-year test of ponderosa pine. J Agric Res 59:855–887Google Scholar
  57. Westman WE (1975) Edaphic climax pattern of the pygmy forest region of California. Ecol Monogr 45:109–135Google Scholar
  58. Westman WE, Whittaker RH (1975) The pygmy forest region of northern California: studies on biomass and primary productivity. J Ecol 63:493–520Google Scholar
  59. Wright RD, Mooney HA (1965) Substrate-oriented distribution of bristlecone pine in the White Mountains of California. Amer Midl Naturalist 73:257–284Google Scholar
  60. Yukawa J, Yamauchi S, Nagai S, Tokuhisa E (1977) Leaf longevity and the defoliating process in saplings of Actinodaphne longifolia (Blume) Nakai. Jap J Ecol 27:171–175 [in Japanese, with figure captions, tables, and summary in English]Google Scholar
  61. Zedenbauer E (1916) Beiträge zur Biologie der Waldbäume. Zentralbl Gesamte Forstwesen 42:233–247Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank W. Ewers
    • 1
  • Rudolf Schmid
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations