, Volume 102, Issue 4, pp 490–493 | Cite as

Frequency-dependent selection in a wild plant-pathogen system

  • Pierre Chaboudez
  • J. J. Burdon
Original Paper


This study investigated the occurrence of the rust fungus Puccinia chondrillina in clonal populations of its host plant, Chondrilla juncea. In 16 populations spread across eastern Turkey, 48 different multilocus isozyme phenotypes were identified in the host. Of these clones, 88% were restricted to single localities, while the remaining 12% were found in 2–11 populations. For 13 of the 16 plant populations the commonest host clone was always infected. Indeed, at ten sites this clone was the only one found to carry disease. In the remaining three populations the rusted plants were all of the second commonest isozyme type. The possibility of such a tight association of rust incidence with host clone frequency simultaneously across a wide geographic area is very low (P≦0.023), supporting the contention that the pathogen P. chondrillina may be imposing negative frequency-dependent selection on these C. juncea populations.

Key words

Agamospermy Chondrilla juncea Frequency-dependent selection Fungal parasitism Puccinia chondrillina 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Antonovics J, Ellstrand NC (1984) Experimental studies of the evolutionary significance of sexual reproduction. I. A. test of the frequency-dependent selection hypothesis. Evolution 38:103–115Google Scholar
  2. Barrett JA (1988) Frequency-dependent selection in plant-fungal interactions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 319:473–483Google Scholar
  3. Bremermann HJJ (1980) Sex and polymorphism as strategies in host-pathogen interactions. Theor Biol 87:671–702Google Scholar
  4. Burdon JJ (1987) Phenotypic and genetic patterns of resistance to the pathogen Phakopsora pachyrhizi in populations of Glycine canescens. Oecologia 73:257–267Google Scholar
  5. Burdon JJ (1994) The distribution and origin of genes for race specific resistance to Melampsora lini in Linum marginale. Evolution 48: in pressGoogle Scholar
  6. Burdon JJ, Groves RH, Cullen JM (1981) The impact of biological control on the distribution and abundance of Chondrilla juncea in south-eastern Australia. J Appl Ecol 18:957–966Google Scholar
  7. Chaboudez P (1989) Modes de reproduction et variabilité génétique des populations de Chondrilla juncea L.: implications dans la lutte microbiologique contre cette mauvaise herbe. Doctoral thesis, Université Scientifique et Technologue, MontpellierGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaboudez P (1994)Patterns of clonal variation in skeleton weed (Chondrilla juncea), an apomictic species. Aust J Bot 42: 283–295Google Scholar
  9. Clarke B (1976) The ecological genetics of host-parasite relationships. In: Taylor AER, Muller R (eds) Genetic aspects of host-parasite relationships. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 87–103Google Scholar
  10. Cullen JM, Kable PF, Catt M (1973) Epidemic spread of a rust imported for biological control. Nature 244:462–464Google Scholar
  11. Emge RG, Melching JS, Kingsolver CH (1981) Epidemiology of Puccinia chondrillina, a rust pathogen for the biological control of rush skeleton weed in the United States. Phytopathology 71:839–843Google Scholar
  12. Haldane JBS (1949) Disease and evolution. La Ricerca Sci [Suppl] 19:68–75Google Scholar
  13. Hamilton WD (1980) Sex versus non-sex versus parasite. Oikos 35:282–290Google Scholar
  14. Hamilton WD, Axelrod R, Tanese R (1990) Sexual reproduction as a adaptation to resist parasites (review). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:3566–3573Google Scholar
  15. Hasan S (1972) Specificity and host specialization of Puccinia chondrillina. Ann Appl Biol 72:257–263Google Scholar
  16. Howard RS, Lively CM (1994) Parasitism, mutation accumulation and the maintenance of sex. Nature 367:554–557Google Scholar
  17. Jaenike J (1978) An hypothesis to accout for the maintenance of sex within populations. Evol Theory 3:191–194Google Scholar
  18. Kondrashov AS (1988) Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature 336:435–440Google Scholar
  19. Levin DA (1975) Pest pressure and recombination systems in plants. Am Nat 109:437–451Google Scholar
  20. Lively CM, Craddock C, Vrijenhoek RC (1990) Red Queen hypothesis supported by parasitism in sexual and clonal fish. Nature 344:864–866Google Scholar
  21. Oehrens EB, Gonzalez SM (1977) Dispersion, ciclo biologico y danos causados por Phragmidium violaceum (Schultz) Winter en zarzamora (Rubus constrictus Lef. et M. y R. ulmifolius Schott.) en la zona centrosur y sur de Chile. Agro Sur 5:73–85Google Scholar
  22. Parker MA (1992) Disease and plant population genetic structure. In: Fritz RS, Simms EL (eds) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution and genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 345–362Google Scholar
  23. Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688Google Scholar
  24. Supkoff DM, Joley DB, Marois JJ (1988) Effect of introduced biological control organisms on the density of Chondrilla juncea in California. J Appl Ecol 25:1089–1095Google Scholar
  25. Tooby J (1982) Pathogens, polymorphism and the evolution of sex. J Theor Biol 97:557–576Google Scholar
  26. Wapshere AJ, Caresche L, Hasan S (1976) The ecology of Chondrilla in the eastern Mediterranean. J Appl Ecol 13:545–553Google Scholar
  27. Wolfe MS (1987) Trying to understand and control powdery mildew. In: Wolfe MS, Caten CE (eds) Populations of plant pathogens: their dynamics and genetics. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 253–273Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre Chaboudez
    • 1
  • J. J. Burdon
    • 1
  1. 1.CSIRO Biological Control UnitCampus International de BaillarguetMontferrier-sur-LezFrance

Personalised recommendations