The fine structure of the terminal sensilla on the maxillary palps of Schistocerca gregaria (Forskål) (Orthoptera, Acrididae)

  • W. M. Blaney
  • R. F. Chapman
Article
Received:

Summary

The fine structure of the terminal sensilla on the maxillary palps of Schistocerca gregaria has been investigated. Most organules include six neurons with dendrites extending to the tip of the cuticular peg, the opening of which is controlled so that the dendrites are not always exposed. The neurons are isolated from each other by a neurilemma cell and two other glial cells, while typical epidermal cells containing dense bundles of microtubules support the whole group of cells. At the poles of the neurons are specialised areas in which the cytoplasm is differentiated from that elsewhere. It contains a large number of mitochondria and small helical structures, while close to it are characteristic spheres of membranes, termed onion bodies, in various stages of development.

It is suggested that the fluid bathing the distal parts of the dendrites and exuding from the tip of the peg has a number of specialised functions. It is probably concerned in forcing open the tip of the peg by hydrostatic pressure, it prevents the exposed tips of the dendrites from desiccating and it acts as a transmitter in which chemicals on the surfaces touched by the sensillum must dissolve before reaching the dendrites. This fluid may be produced by the neurilemma cell or by the neurons themselves. Closure of the pegs does not seem to produce any material reduction in the overall loss of water by the insect.

Each neuron sends an axon to the brain; there is no peripheral fusion of axons. Possibly one neuron has a mechanoreceptor function, although no specialised terminal at the base of the peg has been observed. The concentration of mitochondria at either end of the neuron may be concerned in the production of action potentials, while the cavity of the peg and tormogen cell perhaps has a role in the conduction of the receptor potential to the perikaryon. Intercellular connections are such as to give mechanical stability to the cells of the organule and permit transport between the cells. Extracellular tubules extending from the wall of the peg into the cell complex may serve to anchor the peg during the moulting process.

Keywords

Glial Cell Fine Structure Hydrostatic Pressure Epidermal Cell Distal Part 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J. R., P. E. Holbert, and A. J. Forgash: Electron microscopy of the contact chemoreceptors of the stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 58, 909–917 (1965).Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, N. J., and W. H. Fahrenbach: Fine structure of endocrine hindgut cells of a lepidopteran, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübn.). Z. Zellforsch. 94, 337–345 (1969).Google Scholar
  3. Al-Lami, F., and R. G. Murray: Fine structure of the carotid body of normal and anoxic cats. Anat. Rec. 160, 697–717 (1968).Google Scholar
  4. Aziz, S. A.: Probable hygroreceptors in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria Forsk. (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Indian J. Ent. 19, 164–170 (1958).Google Scholar
  5. Behnke, O.: Helical arrangement of ribosomes in the cytoplasm of differentiating cells of the small intestine of rat foetuses. Exp. Cell Res. 30, 597–598 (1963).Google Scholar
  6. Blaney, W. M., and R. F. Chapman: The anatomy and histology of the maxillary palp of Schistocerca gregaria (Orthoptera, Acrididae). J. Zool. (Lond.) 157, 509–535 (1969).Google Scholar
  7. Duncan, C. J.: The molecular properties and evolution of excitable cells. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1967.Google Scholar
  8. Edney, E. B.: The water relations of terrestrial arthropods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1957.Google Scholar
  9. Guthrie, D. M.: The function and fine structure of the cephalic airflow receptor in Schistocerca gregaria. J. Cell Sci. 1, 463–470 (1966).Google Scholar
  10. Hydén, H.: The neuron. In: J. Brachet and A. E. Mirsky (eds.), The cell. Biochemistry, physiology, morphology, vol. 4. New York: Academic Press 1960.Google Scholar
  11. Karlsson, U.: Three dimensional studies of neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the rat 1. Organelle organization in the perikaryon and its proximal branches. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 16, 429–481 (1966).Google Scholar
  12. Lai-Fook, J.: The structure of developing muscle insertions in insects. J. Morph. 123, 503–528 (1967).Google Scholar
  13. Larsen, J. R.: The fine structure of the labellar chemosensory hairs of the blowfly, Phormia regina Meig. J. Insect Physiol. 8, 683–691 (1962).Google Scholar
  14. Lawrence, P. A.: Development and determination of hairs and bristles in the milkweed bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus (Lygaeidae) (Hemiptera). J. Cell Sci. 1, 475–498 (1966).Google Scholar
  15. Le Berre, J.-R., Y. Sinoir et C. Boulay: Étude de l'équipement sensoriel de l'article distal des palpes chez la larve de Locusta migratoria migratorioides (R. & F.). C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 265, 1717–1720 (1967).Google Scholar
  16. Locke, M.: Pore canals and related structures in insect cuticle. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 10, 589–618 (1961).Google Scholar
  17. —: The structure of septate desmosomes. J. Cell Biol. 25, 166–169 (1965).Google Scholar
  18. —: What every epidermal cell knows. In: J. W. L. Beament and J. E. Treherne (eds.), Insects and physiology. London: Oliver & Boyd 1967.Google Scholar
  19. Lowenstein, W. R., and Y. Kanno: Studies on an epithelial (gland) cell junction I. Modifications of surface membrane permeability. J. Cell Biol. 22, 565–586 (1964).Google Scholar
  20. Moulins, M.: Les cellules sensorielles de l'organe hypopharyngien de Blabera craniifer Burm. (Insecta, Dictyoptera). Étude du segment ciliaire et des structures associées. C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 265, 44–47 (1967).Google Scholar
  21. —: Les sensilles de l'organe hypopharyngien de Blabera craniifer Burm. (Insecta, Dictyoptera). J. Ultrastruct. Res. 2, 474–513 (1968).Google Scholar
  22. Murray, R. G., and A. Murray: The fine structure of the taste buds of rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys. Anat. Rec. 138, 211–233 (1960).Google Scholar
  23. Nicklaus, R., P.-G. Lunquist u. J. Wersäll: Elektronmikroskopie am sensorischen Apparat der Fadenhaare auf den Cerci der Schabe Periplaneta americana. Z. vergl. Physiol. 56, 412–415 (1967).Google Scholar
  24. Noble-Nesbitt, J.: The cuticle and associated structures of Podura aquatica at the moult. Quart. J. micr. Sci. 104, 369–392 (1963).Google Scholar
  25. Palay, S. L., and G. E. Palade: The fine structure of neurons. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 1, 69–88 (1955).Google Scholar
  26. Rees, C. J. C.: Transmission of receptor potential in dipteran chemoreceptors. Nature (Lond.) 215, 301–302 (1967).Google Scholar
  27. Rudall, K. M.: The chitin/protein complexes of insect cuticles. Adv. Ins. Physiol. 1, 257–314 (1963).Google Scholar
  28. Schneider, D.: Chemical sense communication in insects. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 20, 273–297 (1966).Google Scholar
  29. Slifer, E. H., J. J. Prestage, and H. W. Beams: The chemoreceptors and other sense organs on the antennal flagellum of the grasshopper (Orthoptera; Acrididae). J. Morph. 105, 145–191 (1959).Google Scholar
  30. Smith, D. S., and J. E. Treherne: Functional aspects of the organisation of the insect nervous system. Adv. Ins. Physiol. 1, 401–484 (1963).Google Scholar
  31. Steinbrecht, R. A.: On the question of nervous syncytia: lack of axon fusion in two insect sensory nerves. J. Cell Sci. 4, 39–53 (1969).Google Scholar
  32. Stürckow, B.: Ein Beitrag zur Morphologie der labellaren Marginalborste der Fliegen Calliphora und Phormia. Z. Zellforsch. 57, 627–647 (1962).Google Scholar
  33. Tateda, H., and H. Morita: Initiation of spike potentials in contact chemosensory hairs of insects I. The generation site of the recorded spike potentials. J. cell. comp. Physiol. 54, 171–176 (1959).Google Scholar
  34. Thurm, U.: An insect mechanoreceptor. Part I: Fine structure and adequate stimulus. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 30, 75–82 (1965).Google Scholar
  35. Uvarov, B. P.: Grasshoppers and locusts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1966.Google Scholar
  36. Venable, J. H., and R. Coggeshall: A simplified lead citrate stain for use in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 25, 407–408 (1965).Google Scholar
  37. Waddington, C. H., and M. M. Perry: Helical arrangement of ribosomes in differentiating muscle cells. Exp. Cell Res. 30, 599–600 (1963).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. M. Blaney
    • 1
  • R. F. Chapman
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoology DepartmentBirkbeck CollegeLondon

Personalised recommendations