Molecular and General Genetics MGG

, Volume 189, Issue 2, pp 337–339

Genotypic exclusion: A novel relationship between the ribitol-arabitol and galactitol genes of E. coli

  • Christopher D. Link
  • Albey M. Reiner
Short Communication
  • 41 Downloads

Summary

Genetic studies indicate that the E. coli C chromosomal genes which are responsible for catabolism of the pentitol sugars, ribitol and D-arabitol, are not present in the closely related E. coli K12 strains (Reiner 1975). Molecular studies of these tightly linked genes reveal that they are surrounded by 1.4 kilobase inverted repeats of imperfect homology (Link and Reiner 1982). Here we report that E. coli C lacks genes for catabolism of the hexitol sugar galactitol, genes which are present in E. coli K12. Furthermore, the ribitol-arabitol and galactitol genes, which show no mutual homology, are mutually exclusive when exchanged (by homologous recombination) between E. coli C and K12. Physical characterization of λ specialized transducing phages carrying the ribitol-arabitol or galactitol genes demonstrates that this exclusion results because these genes have identical locations in their respective chromosomes. This novel type of allelic relationship between nonhomologous genes has not been previously described in prokaryotes. Analysis of the catabolic capabilities of a collection of natural E. coli strains suggests that this exclusion relationship extends to strains in the natural E. coli population. We suggest an insertion/deletion model to account for the origins of this unusual gene arrangement.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kleckner N, Reichardt K, Botstein D (1979) Inversions and deletions of the Salmonella chromosome generated by the translocatable tetracycline resistance element tn10. J Mol Biol 127:89–115Google Scholar
  2. Kleckner N (1981) Transposable elements in prokaryotes. Annu Rev Genet 15:341–404Google Scholar
  3. Lengeler J (1977) Analysis of mutations affecting the dissimilation of galactitol (dulcitol) in Escherichia coli K12. Mol Gen Genet 152:83–91Google Scholar
  4. Link CD, Reiner AM (1982) Inverted repeats surround the ribitolarabitol genes of E. coli C. Nature 298:94–96Google Scholar
  5. Miller JH (1972) Preparation of λh80 dlac phage and transformation with λh80 dlac DNA. In: Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp 319–321Google Scholar
  6. Reiner AM (1975) Genes for ribitol and D-arabitol catabolism in Escherichia coli: their loci in C strains and absence in K12 and B strains. J Bacteriol 123:530–536Google Scholar
  7. Reiner AM (1977) Xylitol and D-arabitol toxicities due to derepressed fructose, galactitol, and sorbitol phosphotransferases of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 132:166–173Google Scholar
  8. Riley M, Anilionis A (1978) Evolution of the bacterial genome. Ann Rev Microbiol 32:519–560Google Scholar
  9. Scangos GA, Reiner AM (1978a) Ribitol and D-arabitol catabolism in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 134:492–500Google Scholar
  10. Scangos GA, Reiner AM (1978b) Acquisition of ability to utilize xylitol: disadvantages of a constitutive catabolic pathway in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 134:501–505Google Scholar
  11. Schrenk WJ, Weisberg RA (1975) A simple method for making new transducing lines of coliphage lambda. Mol Gen Genet 137:101–107Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher D. Link
    • 1
  • Albey M. Reiner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  2. 2.Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental BiologyUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations