Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 253–258 | Cite as

Reduction of bacterial growth by a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus in the rhizosphere of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)

  • H. Christensen
  • I. Jakobsen


Cucumber was grown in a partially sterilized sand-soil mixture with the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungus Glomus fasciculatum or left uninoculated. Fresh soil extract was places in polyvinyl chloride tubes without propagules of mycorrhizal fungi. Root tips and root segments with adhering soil, bulk soil, and soil from unplanted tubes were sampled after 4 weeks. Samples were labelled with [3H]-thymidine and bacteria in different size classes were measured after staining by acridine orange. The presence of VAM decreased the rate of bacterial DNA synthesis, decreased the bacterial biomass, and changed the spatial pattern of bacterial growth compared to non-mycorrhizal cucumbers. The [3H]-thymidine incorporation was significantly higher on root tips in the top of tubes, and on root segments and bulk soil in the center of tubes on non-mycorrhizal plants compared to mycorrhizal plants. At the bottom of the tubes, the [3H]-thymidine incorporation was significantly higher on root tips of mycorrhizal plants. Correspondingly, the bacterial biovolumes of rods with dimension 0.28–0.40×1.1–1.6 μm, from the bulk soil in the center of tubes and from root segments in the center and top of tubes, and of cocci with a diameter of 0.55–0.78 μm in the bulk soil in the center of tubes, were significantly reduced by VAM fungi. The extremely high bacterial biomass (1–7 mg C g-1 dry weight soil) was significant reduced by mycorrhizal colonization on root segments and in bulk soil. The incorporation of [3H]-thymidine was around one order of magnitude lower compared to other rhizosphere measurements, probably because pseudomonads that did not incorporate [3H]-thymidine dominated the bacterial population. The VAM probably decreased the amount of plant root-derived organic matter available for bacterial growth, and increased bacterial spatial variability by competition. Thus VAM plants seem to be better adapted to compete with the saprophytic soil microflora for common nutrients, e.g., N and P, compared to non-mycorrhizal plants.

Key words

Bacterial biovolume Carbon budget Glomus fasciculatum 3H-thymidine labelling Pseudomonas spp. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ames RN, Reid CPP, Ingham ER (1984) Rhizosphere bacterial population responses to root colonization by a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. New Phytol 96:555–563Google Scholar
  2. Bååth E (1990) Thymidine incorporation into soil bacteria. Soil Biol Biochem 22:803–810Google Scholar
  3. Bååth E, Johnasson T (1990) Measurement of bacterial growth rates on the rhizoplane using 3H-thymidine incorporation into DNA. Plant and Soil 126:113–139Google Scholar
  4. Babuik LA, Paul EA (1970) The use of fluorescein isothiocyanate in the determination of the bacterial biomass of grassland soil. Can J Microbiol 16:57–62Google Scholar
  5. Bakken LR (1982) The turnover of C and N in cultivated soil at different fertilizer levels. Ph D thesis. Agric Univ NorwayGoogle Scholar
  6. Barber DA, Martin JK (1976) The release of organic substances by cereal roots into soil. New Phytol 76:69–80Google Scholar
  7. Bowen GD, Rovira AD (1976) Microbial colonization of plant roots. Annu Rev Phytopathol 14:121–144Google Scholar
  8. Christensen H (1991 a) Conversion factors relating thymidine uptake to growth rate with rhizosphere bacteria. In: Keisler DL, Gregan PB (eds) The rhizosphere and plant growth. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 99–102Google Scholar
  9. Christensen H (1991 b) Growth rate of rhizosphere bacteria as measured by the thymidine method. In: Keisler DL, Gregan PB (eds) The rhizosphere and plant growth. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 105Google Scholar
  10. Christensen H, Funck-Jensen D, Kjøller A (1989) Growth rate of rhizosphere bacteria measured directly by the tritiated thymidine incorporation technique. Soil Biol Biochem 21:113–117Google Scholar
  11. Christensen H, Griffiths B, Christensen S (1992) Bacterial incorporation of tritiated thymidine and populations of bacteriophagous fauna in the rhizosphere of wheat. Soil Biol Biochem 24:703–709Google Scholar
  12. Davis CL (1989) Uptake and incorporation of thymidine by bacterial isolates from an upwelling environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:1267–1272Google Scholar
  13. Güde H (1984) Test for validity of different radioisotopes activity measurements by microbial pure and mixed cultures. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergeb Limnol 19:257–266Google Scholar
  14. Hobbie JE, Daley RJ, Jasper S (1977) Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:1225–1228Google Scholar
  15. Jakobsen I, Rosendahl L (1990) Carbon flow into soil and external hyphae from roots of mycorrhizal cucumber plants. New Phytol 115:77–83Google Scholar
  16. Jenkinson DS, Powlson DS, Wedderburn RWM (1976) The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil: III. The relationship between soil biovolume, measured by optical microscopy, and the flush of decomposition caused by fumigation. Soil Biol Biochem 8:189–202Google Scholar
  17. Linderman RG (1988) Mycorrhizal interactions with the rhizosphere microflora. Phytopathology 78:366–371Google Scholar
  18. Lynch JM, Panting LM (1980) Variations in the size of the soil biomass. Soil Biol Biochem 12:547–550Google Scholar
  19. Lynch JM, Whipps JM (1990) Substrate flow in the rhizosphere. Plant and Soil 129:1–10Google Scholar
  20. Meyer JR, Linderman RG (1986) Selective influence on populations of rhizosphere or rhizosplane bacteria and actinomycetes by mycorrhizas formed by Glomus fasciculatum. Soil Biol Biochem 18:191–196Google Scholar
  21. Paulitz TC, Linderman RG (1989) Interactions between fluorescent pseudomonads and VA-mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 113:37–45Google Scholar
  22. Pietr SJ, Kempa R (1989) Cucumber rhizosphere pseudomonads as antagonists of Fusarium. In: Vancura V, Kunc F (eds) Interrelationships between microorganisms and plants in soil. Academia, Praha, pp 411–417Google Scholar
  23. Pollard PC, Moriarty DJW (1984) Validity of the tritiated thymidine method for estimating bacterial growth rates: Measurements of isotope dilution during DNA synthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:1076–1083Google Scholar
  24. Rovira AD, Sands DC (1971) Fluorescent pseudomonads — a residual component in the soil microflora? J Appl Bacteriol 34:253–259Google Scholar
  25. Sauerbeck DR, Johnen BG (1977) Root formation and decomposition during plant growth. In: Soil organic matter studies, vol 1. Int Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, pp 141–148Google Scholar
  26. Schwab SM, Menge JA, Leonard RT (1983) Quantitative and qualitative effects of phosphorus on extracts and exudates of sudangrass roots in relation to vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza formation. Plant Physiol 73:761–765Google Scholar
  27. Secilia J, Bagyaraj DJ (1987) Bacteria and actinomycetes associated with pot cultures of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas. Can J Microbiol 33:1069–1073Google Scholar
  28. Simon M, Azam F (1989) Protein content and protein synthesis rates of planktonic marine bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 51:201–213Google Scholar
  29. Stille B (1938) Untersuchungen über die Bedeutung der Rhizosphäre. Arch Mikrobiol 9:477–485Google Scholar
  30. West AW, Sparling GP, Grant WD (1987) Relationship between mycelial and bacterial populations in stored, air-dried and glucose-amended arable and grassland soil. Soil Biol Biochem 19:599–605Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Christensen
    • 1
  • I. Jakobsen
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Population BiologyCopenhagen UniversityCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Plant Biology Section, Environmental Science and Technology DepartmentRisø National LaboratoryRoskildeDenmark
  3. 3.Biotechnologic InstituteLyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations