Advertisement

Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 51, Issue 4, pp 213–222 | Cite as

A model for direction selectivity in threshold motion perception

  • Hugh R. Wilson
Article

Abstract

Thresholds were measured for a moving line superimposed on moving sinusoidal gratings. When line and grating moved in the same direction significant subthreshold summation was observed over a range of spatial frequencies. For motion of the line and grating in opposite directions, summation was never observed. This supports the hypothesis that direction selective mechanisms are responsible for motion perception at threshold. Further analysis of the data produced estimates of the spatial frequency tuning of these mechanisms. A quantitative model is proposed to interpret the data, and it is suggested that flickering gratings are not decomposed into their moving components by the visual system.

Keywords

Opposite Direction Visual System Spatial Frequency Quantitative Model Frequency Tuning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adelson, E.H., Bergen, J.R.: Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Presented at the Annual Meeting, Optical Society of America, October, 1983Google Scholar
  2. Barlow, H.B., Levick, W.R.: The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit's retina. J. Physiol. 178, 477–504 (1965)Google Scholar
  3. Bergen, J.R., Wilson, H.R.: Prediction of flicker sensitivities from temporal pulse data. Vision Res. (in press, 1985)Google Scholar
  4. Bishop, P.O., Coombs, J.S., Henry, G.H.: Responses to visual contours: spatio-temporal aspects of excitation in the receptive fields of simple striate neurons. J. Physiol. 219, 625–657 (1971)Google Scholar
  5. Burt, P.J.: Time-space limits on information processing in early vision: a computational perspective. Presented at the Annual Meeting, Optical Society of America, October, 1983Google Scholar
  6. Crane, H.D., Steele, C.M.: Accurate three-dimensional eyetacker. Appl. Opt. 17, 619–705 (1978)Google Scholar
  7. Foster, D.H.: A model of the human visual system in its response to certain classes of moving stimuli. Kybernetik 8, 69–84 (1971)Google Scholar
  8. Ganz, L.: Properties of cortical inhibition in directionally selective neurons: some neurophysiological parallels to the perception of movement. In: Visual psychophysics and physiology. Pp. 115–126. Armington, J.C., Krauskopf, J., Wooten, B.R., eds New York: Academic Press 1978Google Scholar
  9. Goodwin, A.W., Henry, G.H., Bishop, P.O.: Direction selectivity of simple striate cells: properties and mechanism. J. Neurophysiol. 38, 1500–1523 (1975)Google Scholar
  10. Hubel, D.H., Wiesel, T.N.: Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol. 160, 106–154 (1962)Google Scholar
  11. Hubel, D.H., Wiesel, T.N.: Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J. Physiol. 195, 215–243 (1968)Google Scholar
  12. Kelly, D.H.: Motion and vision. II. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 1340–1349 (1979)Google Scholar
  13. Kulikowski, J.J., King-Smith, P.E.: Spatial arrangement of line, edge, and grating detectors revealed by subthreshold summation. Vision Res. 13, 1455–1478 (1973)Google Scholar
  14. Levinson, E., Sekuler, R.: The independence of channels in human vision selective for direction of movement. J. Physiol. 250 347–366 (1975)Google Scholar
  15. Levinson, E., Sekuler, R.: A two-dimensional analysis of direction-specific adaptation. Vision Res. 20 103–107 (1980)Google Scholar
  16. Movshon, J.A.: The velocity tuning of single units in cat striate cortex. J. Physiol. 249, 445–468 (1975)Google Scholar
  17. Movshon, J.A., Thompson, I.D., Tolhurst, D.J.: Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex. J. Physiol. 283, 53–77 (1978)Google Scholar
  18. Orban, G.A., Kennedy, H., Maes, H.: Response to movement of neurons in areas 17 and 18 of the cat: velocity sensitivity. J. Neurophysiol. 45, 1043–1058 (1981a)Google Scholar
  19. Orban, G.A., Kennedy, H., Maes, H.: Response to movement of neurons in areas 17 and 18 of the cat: direction selectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 45, 1059–1073 (1981b)Google Scholar
  20. Peichl, L., Wassle, H. Size, scatter and coverage of ganglion cell receptive field centers in the cat retina. J. Physiol. 291, 117–141 (1979)Google Scholar
  21. Poggio, T., Reichardt, W.: Considerations on models of movement detection. Kybernetik 13, 223–227 (1973)Google Scholar
  22. Quick, R.F.: A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection Kybernetick 16, 65–67 (1974)Google Scholar
  23. Rashbass, C.: The visibility of transient changes of luminance. J. Physiol. 210 165–186 (1970)Google Scholar
  24. Reichardt, W., Poggio, T.: Visual control of orientation behavior in the fly. Q. Rev. Biophys. 9, 311–438 (1976)Google Scholar
  25. Reichardt, W., Varju, D.: Übertragungseigenschaften im Auswertesystem für das Bewegungssehen. Z. Naturforsch. 14b, 674–689 (1959)Google Scholar
  26. Robson, J.G.: Receptive fields: neural representation of the spatial and intensive attributes of the visual image. In: Handbook of perception seeing. Vol. V, pp. 81–116. Carterette, E.C., Friedman, M.P. eds. New York: Academic Press 1975Google Scholar
  27. Sakitt, B., Barlow, H.B.: A model for the economical encoding of the visual image in cerebral cortex. Biol. Cybern. 43, 97–108 (1982)Google Scholar
  28. Schouten, J.F.: Subjective stroboscopy and a model of visual movement detectors. In: Models for the perception of speech and visual form. pp. 44–55. Wathen-Dunn, W., ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1967Google Scholar
  29. Sekuler, R., Ganz, L.: A new aftereffect of seen movement with a stabilized retinal image. Science 139, 419–420 (1963)Google Scholar
  30. Thorson, J.: Small signal analysis of a visual reflex in the locust. II. Frequency dependence. Kybernetik 3, 53–66 (1966)Google Scholar
  31. Tolhurst, D.J., Movshon, J.A.: Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of striate contical neurones. Nature 257, 674–675 (1975)Google Scholar
  32. Torre, V., Poggio, T.: A synaptic mechanism possibly underlying directional selectivity to motion. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 202, 409–416 (1978)Google Scholar
  33. vanSanten, J.P.H., Sperling, G.: A temporal covariance model for motion perception. Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. [Suppl.] 24, 277 (1983)Google Scholar
  34. Watson, A.B., Nachmias, J.: Patterns of temoral interaction in the detection of grating. Vision Res. 17, 893–902 (1977)Google Scholar
  35. Watson, A.B., Thompson, P.G., Murphy, B.J., Nachmias, J.: Summation and discrimination of gratings moving in opposite directions. Vision Res. 20 341–347 (1980)Google Scholar
  36. Watson, A.B.: Probability summation over time. Vision Res. 19, 515–522 (1979)Google Scholar
  37. Wilson, H.R., Bergen, J.R.: A four mechanism model for threshold spatial vision. Vision Res. 19, 19–32 (1979)Google Scholar
  38. Wilson, H.R.: Spatiotemporal characterization of a transient mechanism in the human visual system. Vision Res. 20, 433–452 (1980)Google Scholar
  39. Wilson, H.R., McFarlane, D.K., Phillips, G.C. Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking. Vision Res. 23, 873–882 (1983)Google Scholar
  40. Wilson, H.R., Gelb, D.J.: A modified line element theory for spatial frequency and width discrimination. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 124–131 (1984)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugh R. Wilson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biophysics and Theoretical BiologyUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations