Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 60–62 | Cite as

A method of processing soil core samples for root studies by subsampling

  • Götz Schroth
  • Dorothee Kolbe
Original Paper

Abstract

Root studies are generally believed to be very important in ecological research. Soil coring is a valuable approach to root research, but it requires a very large amount of processing time. We present here a method for processing soil cores consisting of the combination and homogenization of several soil cores from a plot, with subsequent subsampling for root extraction. The required subsample size was determined for a topsoil and a subsoil sample from a groundnut field and was found to be 5–10% of the total soil sample. Advantages and limitations of the method are discussed.

Key words

Root biomass Root extraction Root length Sample homogenization Soil coring 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowen GD (1985) Roots as a component of tree productivity. In: Cannell MGR, Jackson JE (eds) Attributes of trees as crop plants. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Huntingdon, pp 303–315Google Scholar
  2. Caldwell MM, Virginia RA (1989) Root systems. In: Pearcy RW, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Rundel PW (eds) Plant physiological ecology. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 367–398Google Scholar
  3. Fairley RI, Alexander IJ (1985) Methods of calculating fine root production in forests. In: Fitter AH, Atkinson D, Read DJ, Usher MB (eds) Ecological interactions in soil. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 37–42Google Scholar
  4. FAO/Unesco (1988) Soil map of the world, revised legend. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  5. Mackie-Dawson LA, Atkinson D (1991) Methodology for the study of roots in field experiments and the interpretation of results. In: Atkinson D (ed) Plant root growth. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 25–47Google Scholar
  6. McClaugherty CA, Aber JD, Melillo JM (1982) The role of fine roots in the organic matter and nitrogen budgets of two forested ecosystems. Ecology 63:1481–1490Google Scholar
  7. Persson H (1990) Methods of studying root dynamics in relation to nutrient cycling. In: Harrison AF, Ineson P, Heal OW (eds) Nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. Elsevier, London, pp 198–217Google Scholar
  8. Ruhigwa BA, Gichuru MP, Mambani B, Tariah NM (1992) Root distribution of Acioa barteri, Alchornea cordifolia, Cassia siamea and Gmelina arborea in an acid Ultisol. Agrofor Syst 19:67–78Google Scholar
  9. Sandhage-Hofmann A, Zech W (1993) Dynamik and Elementgehalte von Fichtenfeinwurzeln in Kalkgesteinsböden am Wank (Bayerische Kalkalpen). Z Pflanzenernähr Bodenkd 156: 181–190Google Scholar
  10. Tennant D (1975) A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. J Ecol 63:995–1001Google Scholar
  11. Vogt KA, Persson H (1991) Measuring growth and development of roots: In: Lassoie JP, Hinckley TM (eds) Techniques and approaches in forest tree ecophysiology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 477–501Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Götz Schroth
    • 1
  • Dorothee Kolbe
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für BodenkundeUniversität BayreuthBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations