Advertisement

Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 99–103 | Cite as

Soil nematode biodiversity

  • Ernest C. Bernard
Article

Summary

Nematodes are the most abundant metazoans in soil, and are exceeded in species diversity only by the arthropods. Estimates of nematode diversity in natural and agroecosystems have been based on both species-level taxonomy and trophic-level guilds. Because trophic groups do not act in a unitary manner with respect to environmental alterations, species-level analysis is more meaningful and should be preferred for most kinds of investigations. Nematodes of a biotope have often been considered as mere assemblages, but there is increasing evidence that certain plant associations have characteristic groups of species. This concept has been used by Bongers to develop a maturity index relating nematode families and site stability, and to identify assemblages that colonize disturbed soils. Major constraints on detailed ecological studies of soil nematode faunas are an incomplete understanding of trophic groups and their subsets, the need for repeated sampling of seasonally variable populations, and a severe shortage of taxonomy-competent persons, especially for microbial feeders.

Key words

Nematodes Diveristy Trophic groups Maturity index Community structure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arpin P, Ponge J-F (1986) Influence d'une implanation récente de pin sylvestre sur le comportement de la nématofaune du sol, par comparison avec un peuplement feuillu pur et un peuplement mélangé. Pedobiologia 29:391–404Google Scholar
  2. Baird SM, Bernard EC (1984) Nematode population and community dynamics in soybean-wheat cropping and tillage regimes. J Nematol 16:379–386Google Scholar
  3. Bedding RA (1967) Parasitic and free-living cycles in entomogenous nematodes of the genus Deladenus. Nature (London) 214:174–175Google Scholar
  4. Bongers T (1986) Nematodes in the bioecosystem. Molm 6:20–30Google Scholar
  5. Bongers T (1988) De nematoden van Nederland. Koninklijke Nederlandse Natuurhistorische Vereiniging Utrecht, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  6. Bongers T (1990) The maturity index: An ecological measure of environmental disturbance based on nematode species composition. Oecologia 83:14–19Google Scholar
  7. Boström S, Sohlenius B (1986) Short-term dynamics of nematode communities in arable soil: Influence of a perennial and an annual cropping system. Pedobiologia 29:345–357Google Scholar
  8. Coomans A (1989) Overzicht van de vrijlevende nematofauna van België. Verh Symp Invert Belgie, pp 43–56Google Scholar
  9. Dmowska E, Kołowska J (1988) Communities of nematodes in soil treated with semi-liquid manure. Pedobiologia 32:323–330Google Scholar
  10. Faulkner LR, Darling HM (1961) Pathological histology, hosts and culture of the potato rot nematode. Phytopathology 51:778–786Google Scholar
  11. Ferris VR (1989) Why ecologists need systematists: Importance of systematics to ecological research. J Nematol 21:308–314Google Scholar
  12. Ferris VR, Ferris JM (1972) Interrelationships between nematode and plant communities in agricultural ecosystems. Agro-Ecosystems 1:275–299Google Scholar
  13. Forge TA, MacGuidwin AE (1990) Cold hardening of Meloidogyne hapla second-stage juveniles. J Nematol 22:105–110Google Scholar
  14. Fortuner R (ed) (1988) Nematode identification and expert system technology. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Freckman DW (ed) (1982) Nematodes in soil ecosystems. University of Texas Press, Austin, TexasGoogle Scholar
  16. Freckman DW, Caswell EP (1985) The ecology of nematodes in agroecosystems. Annu Rev Phytopathol 23:275–296Google Scholar
  17. Freckman DW, Whitford WG, Steinberger Y (1987) Effect of irrigation on nematode population dynamics and activity in desert soils. Biol Fertil Soils 3:3–10Google Scholar
  18. Gowen SR (1971) Tylenchus emarginatus and Tylenchorhynchus dubius associated with Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) seedlings. Plaut Pathol 20:69–72Google Scholar
  19. Huettel RN, Dickson DW, Kaplan DT (1984) Radopholus citrophilus sp. n. (Nematoda), a sibling species of Radopholus similis. Proc Helminthol Soc Wash 51:32–35Google Scholar
  20. Ingham RE, Trofymow JA, Ingham ER, Coleman DC (1985) Interactions of bacteria, fungi, and their nematode grazers: Effects on nutrient cycling and plant growth. Ecol Monogr 55:119–140Google Scholar
  21. Johnson SR, Ferris VR, Ferris JM (1972) Nematode community structure of forest woodlots: I. Relationships based on similarity coefficients of nematode species. J Nematol 4:175–183Google Scholar
  22. Johnson SR, Ferris JM, Ferris VR (1973) Nematode community structure in forest woodlots: II. Ordination of nematode communities. J Nematol 5:95–107Google Scholar
  23. Johnson SR, Ferris JM, Ferris VR (1974) Nematode community structure of forest woodlots: III. Ordinations of taxonomic groups and biomass. J Nematol 6:118–126Google Scholar
  24. Juman NG, Mishra CC (1988) Effect of an annual and a perennial crop on trophic group dynamics of nematodes. Can J Soil Sci 68:101–109Google Scholar
  25. Khera S, Zuckerman BM (1963) In vitro studies of host-parasite relationships of some plant-parasitic nematodes. Nematologica 9:1–6Google Scholar
  26. Magnusson C (1983) Abundance and trophic structure of pine forest nematodes in relation to soil layers and ground cover. Holarc Ecol 6:175–182Google Scholar
  27. Niblack TL (1989) Applications of nematode community structure research to agricultural production and habitat disturbance. J Nematol 21:437–443Google Scholar
  28. Niblack TL, Bernard EC (1985a) Nematode community structure in dogwood, maple, and peach nurseries in Tennessee. J Nematol 17:126–131Google Scholar
  29. Niblack TL, Bernard EC (1985b) Plant-parasitic nematode communities in dogwood, maple, and peach nurseries in Tennessee. J Nematol 17:132–139Google Scholar
  30. Nicholas WL (1984) The biology of free-living nematodes. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Norton DC (1978) Ecology of plant-parasitic nematodes. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Norton DC (1987) Plant nematode communities. Int J Parasitol 17:215–222Google Scholar
  33. Norton DC, Schmitt DP (1978) Community analyses of plant-parasitic nematodes in the Kalsow Prairie, Iowa. J Nematol 10:171–176Google Scholar
  34. Odum EP (1971) Fundamentals of ecology. WB Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  35. Peet RK (1974) The measurement of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:285–307Google Scholar
  36. Pickup J (1990a) Seasonal variation in the cold hardiness of three species of free-living antarctic nematodes. Funct Ecol 4:257–264Google Scholar
  37. Pickup J (1990b) Strategies of cold-hardiness in three species of antarctic dorylaimid nematodes. J Comp Physiol B 160:167–173Google Scholar
  38. Procter DLC (1990) Global overview of the functional roles of soil-living nematodes in terrestrial communities and ecosystems. J Nematol 22:1–7Google Scholar
  39. Remillet M, Laumond C (1991) Spaerularioid nematodes of importance in agriculture. In: Nickle WR (ed) Manual of agricultural nematology. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 967–1024Google Scholar
  40. Schulte F (1989) Life history of Rhabditis (Pelodera) orbitalis — a larval parasite in the eye orbits of arvicolid and murid rodents. Proc Helminthol Soc Wash 56:1–7Google Scholar
  41. Singh RV, Khera S (1982) In vitro studies on feeding of some plant parasitic nematodes. Indian J Nematol 12:31–37Google Scholar
  42. Small RW (1987) A review of the prey of predatory soil nematodes. Pedobiologia 30:179–206Google Scholar
  43. Smolik JD, Lewis JK (1982) Effect of range condition on density and biomass of nematodes in a mixed prairie ecosystem. J Range Manage 35:657–663Google Scholar
  44. Sohlenius B (1980) Abundance, biomass and contribution to energy flow by soil nematodes in terrestrial ecosystems. Oikos 34:186–194Google Scholar
  45. Sohlenius B, Boström S, Sandor A (1987) Long-term dynamics of nematode communities in arable soil under four cropping regimes. J Appl Ecol 24:131–144Google Scholar
  46. Sohlenius B, Boström S, Sandor A (1988) Carbon and nitrogen budgets of nematodes in arable soil. Biol Fertil Soils 6:1–8Google Scholar
  47. Volz P (1951) Untersuchungen über die Microfauna des Waldbodens. Zool Jahrb Abt Syst Ökol Geogr Tiere 79:514–566Google Scholar
  48. Wasilewska L (1971) Nematodes of the dunes in the Kampinos Forest: II. Community structure based on numbers of individuals, state of biomass and respiratory metabolism. Ekol Pol 19:651–688Google Scholar
  49. Westcott SW III, Barker KR (1976) Interaction of Acrobeloides buetschlii and Rhizobium leguminosarum on Wando pea. Phytopathology 66:468–472Google Scholar
  50. Wharton DA (1986) A functional biology of nematodes. Johns Hopkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  51. Wheeler QD (1990) Insect diversity and cladistic constraints. Ann Entomol Soc Am 83:1031–1047Google Scholar
  52. Wolda H (1981) Similarity indices, sample size and diversity. Oecologia 50:296–302Google Scholar
  53. Womersley C (1987) A reevaluation of strategies employed by nematode anhydrobiotes in relation to their natural environment. In: Veech JA, Dickson DW (eds) Vistas on nematology. Society of Nematologists Hyattsville, Maryland, pp 165–173Google Scholar
  54. Wood FH (1973a) Life cycle and host-parasite relationships of Aglenchus costatus (de Man, 1921) Meyl, 1961 (Nematoda: Tylenchidae). NZ J Agric Res 16:373–380Google Scholar
  55. Wood FH (1973b) Nematode feeding relationships: Feeding relationships of soil-dwelling nematodes. Soil Biol Biochem 5:593–601Google Scholar
  56. Yeates GW (1979) Soil nematodes in terrestrial ecosystems. J Nematol 11:213–229Google Scholar
  57. Yeates GW (1984) Variation in soil nematode diversity under pasture with soil and year. Soil Biol Biochem 16:95–102Google Scholar
  58. Yeates GW (1987) Nematode feeding and activity: The importance of development stages. Biol Fertil Soils 3:143–146Google Scholar
  59. Zullini A, Peretti E (1986) Lead pollution and moss-inhabiting nematodes of an industrial area. Water Air Soil Pollut 27:403–410Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ernest C. Bernard
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Entomology and Plant PathologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations