Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 61–67 | Cite as

Evolution of dinitrogen and nitrous oxide from the soil to the atmosphere through rice plants

  • A. R. Mosier
  • S. K. Mohanty
  • A. Bhadrachalam
  • S. P. Chakravorti


It is commonly assumed that a large fraction of fertilizer N applied to a rice (Oryza sativa L.) field is lost from the soil-water-plant system as a result of denitrification. Direct evidence to support this view, however, is limited. The few direct field, denitrification gas measurements that have been made indicate less N loss than that determined by 15N balance after the growing season. One explanation for this discrepancy is that the N2 produced during denitrification in a flooded soil remains trapped in the soil system and does not evolve to the atmosphere until the soil dries or is otherwise disturbed. It seems likely, however, that N2 produced in the soil uses the rice plants as a conduit to the atmosphere, as does methane. Methane evolution from a rice field has been demonstrated to occur almost exclusively through the rice plants themselves. A field study in Cuttack, India, and a greenhouse study in Fort Collins, Colorado, were conducted to determine the influence of rice plants on the transport of N2 and N2O from the soil to the atmosphere. In these studies, plots were fertilized with 75 or 99 atom % 15N-urea and 15N techniques were used to monitor the daily evolution of N2 and N2O. At weekly intervals the amount of N2+N2O trapped in the flooded soil and the total-N and fertilized-N content of the soil and plants were measured in the greenhouse plots. Direct measurement of N2+N2O emission from field and greenhouse plots indicated that the young rice plant facilitates the efflux of N2 and N2O from the soil to the atmosphere. Little N gas was trapped in the rice-planted soils while large quantities were trapped in the unplanted soils. N losses due to denitrification accounted for only up to 10% of the loss of added N in planted soils in the field or greenhouse. The major losses of fertilizer N from both the field and greenhouse soils appear to have been the result of NH3 volatilization.

Key words

Denitrification Flooded soil 15Urea 15N balance Wetland rice Oryza sativa L. 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Buresh RJ, Austin ER (1988) Direct measurement of dinitrogen and nitrous oxide flux in flooded rice fields. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:681–688Google Scholar
  2. Cai GX, Freney JR, Humphreys E, Denmead OT, Samson M, Simpson JR (1987) Use of surface films to reduce ammonia volatilization from flooded rice fields. Aust J Agric Res 39:177–186Google Scholar
  3. Cicerone RJ, Shetter JD (1981) Sources of atmospheric methane: Measurements in rice paddies and a discussion. J Geophys Res 86:7203–7209Google Scholar
  4. Craswell ET, Vleck PLG (1979) Fate of fertilizer nitrogen applied to wetland rice. In: Nitrogen and rice. Int Rice Inst (Los Baños) pp 175–192Google Scholar
  5. De Datta SK (1981) Principles and practices of rice production. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. De Datta SK, Obcemea WN, Chen RY, Calabio JC, Evangelista RC (1987) Effect of water depth on nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen-15 balance in lowland rice. Agron J 79:210–216Google Scholar
  7. Fillery IRP, Simpson JR, De Datta SK (1984) Influence of field environment and fertilizer management on ammonia loss from flooded rice. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:914–920Google Scholar
  8. Fillery IRP, Simpson JR, De Datta SK (1986) Contribution of ammonia volatilization to total nitrogen loss after applications of urea to wetland rice fields. Fert Res 8:193–202Google Scholar
  9. Freney JR, Leuning R, Simpson JR, Denmead OT, Muirhead WA (1985) Estimating ammonia volatilization from flooded rice fields by simplified techniques. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:1049–1054Google Scholar
  10. Holt LS, Christanson CB, Austin ER, Katyal JC (1988) A laboratory technique for releasing and measuring denitrification products trapped in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:1510–1511Google Scholar
  11. Lindau CW, Patrick WH Jr, Delaune RD, Reddy KR, Bollich PK (1988) Entrapment of nitrogen-15 dinitrogen during soil denitrification. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:538–540Google Scholar
  12. Marshall RB, Whiteway JN (1985) Automation of an interface between a nitrogen analyzer and an isotope ratio mass spectrometer. Analyst 110:867–871Google Scholar
  13. Mosier AR, Mack L (1980) Gas chromatographic system for precise, rapid analysis of N2O. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:1121–1123Google Scholar
  14. Mosier AR, Guenzi WD, Schweizer EE (1986) Soil losses of dinitrogen and nitrous oxide from irrigated crops in Northeastern Colorado. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:344–348Google Scholar
  15. Mosier AR, Bhadrachalam A, Chakravorti SP, Mohanty SK (1988) Direct field measurement of denitrification in intermittently flooded rice. Agron Abstracts, Am Soc Agron, Madison, Wisconsin, p 244Google Scholar
  16. Mulvaney RL, Vanden Heuvel RM (1988) Evaluation of nitrogen-15 tracer techniques for direct measurement of denitrification in soil: IV. Field studies. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:1332–1337Google Scholar
  17. Reddy KR, Patrick WH Jr (1986a) Fate of fertilizer nitrogen in the rece root zone. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:649–651Google Scholar
  18. Reddy KR, Patrick WH Jr (1986b) Denitrification losses in flooded rice fields. Fert Res 9:99–116Google Scholar
  19. Rolston DE, Sharpley AN, Toy DW, Broadbent FE (1982) Field measurement of denitrification: III. Rates during irrigation cycles. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:289–296Google Scholar
  20. Savant NK, De Datta SK (1982) Nitrogen transformation in wetland rice soils. Adv Agron 35:241–302Google Scholar
  21. Schutz H, Seiler W, Conrad R (1989) Processes involved in formation and emission of methane in rice paddies. Biogeochem 7:33–53Google Scholar
  22. Seiler W, Holzapfel-Pschorn A, Conrad R, Scharite D (1984) Methane emission from rice paddies. J Atoms Chem 1:241–268Google Scholar
  23. Siegel RS, Hauck RD, Kurtz LT (1982) Determination of 30N2 and application to measurement of N2 evolution during denitrification. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:68–74Google Scholar
  24. Simpson JR, Freney JR (1988) Interacting processes in gaseous nitrogen loss from urea applied to flooded rice fields. In: Pushparajah E (ed) Urea technology and utilization. Malaysian Society of Soil Science, Kuala Lumpur, pp 281–290Google Scholar
  25. Simpson JR, Freney JR, Muirhead WA, Leuning R (1985) Effects of phenylphosphorodiamidate and dicyandiamide on nitrogen loss from flooded rice. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:1426–1431Google Scholar
  26. Simpson JR, Muirhead WA, Bowner KH, Cai GX, Freney JR (1988) Control of gaseous nitrogen losses from urea applied to flooded rice soils. Fert Res 18:31–47Google Scholar
  27. Zhu ZL, Chen RY, Zu YF, Zhang SL (1979) The effect of forms and methods of placement of nitrogen fertilizer on the characteristics of the nitrogen supply in paddy soils. Acta Pewdol Sin 19:218–233Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. R. Mosier
    • 1
  • S. K. Mohanty
  • A. Bhadrachalam
  • S. P. Chakravorti
    • 2
  1. 1.USDA-ARSFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.Central Rice Research InstituteCuttackIndia

Personalised recommendations