Advertisement

Light and electron microscopy of the leucocytes of Crassostrea virginica (Mollusca: Pelecypoda)

  • S. Y. Feng
  • J. S. Feng
  • C. N. Burke
  • L. H. Khairallah
Article

Summary

The fine structure of oyster leucocytes resembles to a great extent, that of typical eucaryotic cells. Organelles which have been described for the first time in this report are light granules, dense granules, protocentriole and X structure. Light microscopy reveals two morphological types of oyster leucocytes: agranular and granular. Based upon nuclear morphology and cytoplasmic compositions revealed in electron microscopy, at least three types of agranular and one type of granular cells are recognized.

In the Giemsa-stained preparations, granular leucocytes exhibit three distinct types of cytoplasmic granules: refractile, dark blue, and pink, which presumably correspond to light granules Type A, B, and C seen in the electron micrographs. A granular leucocyte may contain one or more types of granules. Cytochemical investigations show that oyster leucocytes contain at least three hydrolytic enzymes: non-specific esterases, acid, and alkaline phosphatase. The latter two enzymes constitute 63% of the enzyme activity detected. These intracellular enzymes may be associated with the light granules and/or lysosome-like bodies.

It is also demonstrated that the granular leucocyte population is significantly higher (P<0.001) in the oysters experimentally infected with Bacillus mycoides (72.19±4.71%) as contrasted with that of the controls (37.18±4.48%).

Leucocytes in progressive stages of degeneration are also described.

Key-Words

Leucocytes Invertebrates Oyster Ultrastructure Cytochemistry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archer, G. T., Hirsch, J. G.: Isolation of granules from eosinophil and study of their enzyme content. J. exp. Med. 118, 277–286 (1963a).Google Scholar
  2. —: Motion picture studies on degranulation of horse eosinophils during phagocytosis. J. exp. Med. 118, 287–293 (1963b).Google Scholar
  3. Bainton, D. F., Farquhar, M. G.: Origin of granules in polymorphonuclear leucocytes. J. Cell Biol. 28, 277–301 (1966).Google Scholar
  4. —: Segregation and packaging of granule enzymes in eosinophilic leukocytes. J. Cell Biol. 45, 54–73 (1970).Google Scholar
  5. Balazs, A.: Granule formation in rat myeloid cells. An electron microscopic study. Z. Zellforsch. 99, 286–301 (1969).Google Scholar
  6. Burstone, M. S.: The cytochemical localization of esterase. J. nat. Cancer Inst. 18, 167–172 (1957).Google Scholar
  7. —: Histochemical comparison of naphthol AS-phosphates for the demonstration of phosphatases. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 20, 601–616 (1958).Google Scholar
  8. Caro, L. G., Palade, G. E.: Protein synthesis, storage and discharge in the pancreatic exocrine cell. J. Cell Biol. 20, 473–495 (1964).Google Scholar
  9. Cheng, T. C., Rifkin, E.: Cellular reactions in marine molluscs in response to helminth parasitism. In: Symposium on Diseases of Fishes and Shellfishes, S. F. Snieszko, Ed. Amer. Fisheries Soc. Special Publ. No. 5, 443–496 (1970).Google Scholar
  10. Chestnut, A. F.: Studies on the digestive processes of Ostrea mrginica. Doctoral Thesis, Rutgers, The State University, New Brunswick, N. J. pp. 88 (1949).Google Scholar
  11. Cohn, Z. A., Hirsch, J. G.: The isolation and properties of the specific cytoplasmic granules of rabbit polymorphonuclear leucocytes. J. exp. Med. 112, 983–1104 (1960).Google Scholar
  12. Duve, C. de: The lysosome content. Ciba Foundation Symposium on Lysosomes (A. V. S. deReuck and M. P. Cameron, eds.), pp. 1–28. Boston: Little, Brown & Co. 1963.Google Scholar
  13. Eble, A. F.: Some observations on the seasonal distribution of selected enzymes in the American oyster as revealed by enzyme histochemistry. Pros. Nat. Shellfish. Ass. 56, 37–42 (1966).Google Scholar
  14. —, Tripp, M. R.: Enzyme histochemistry of phagosomes in oyster leucocytes. Bull. N. J. Acad. Sci. B 13, 93 (1968).Google Scholar
  15. Fedorko, M. E.: Formation of cytoplasmic granules in human eosinophilic myelocytes: An electron microscope autoradiographic study. Blood 31, 188–194 (1968).Google Scholar
  16. —, Hirsch, J. G.: Cytoplasmic granule formation in myelocytes. An electron microscopc radioautographic study on the mechanism of formation of cytoplasmic granules in rabbit heterophilic myelocytes. J. Cell Biol. 29, 307–316 (1966).Google Scholar
  17. Feng, S. Y.: Pinocytosis of proteins by oyster leucocytes. Biol. Bull. 129, 95–105 (1965).Google Scholar
  18. —: Experimental bacterial infections in the oyster Crassostrea virginica. J. Invertebrate Path. 8, 505–511 (1966).Google Scholar
  19. —: Responses of molluscs to foreign bodies, with special reference to the oyster. Fed. Proc. 26, 1685–1692 (1967).Google Scholar
  20. George, W. C.: The digestion and absorption of fat in lamellibranchs. Biol. Bull. 102, 118–127 (1952).Google Scholar
  21. Hearing, V., Vernick, S. H.: Fine structure of the blood cells of the lobster, Homarus americanus. Chesapeake Sci. 8, 170–186 (1967).Google Scholar
  22. Hirsch, J. C.: Cinematographic observations on granule lysis in polymorphonuclear leucocytes during phagocytosis. J. exp. Med. 116, 827–834 (1962).Google Scholar
  23. —, Cohn, Z. A.: Degranulation of polymorphonuclear leucocytes following phagocytosis of microorganisms. J. exp. Med. 112, 1005–1014 (1960).Google Scholar
  24. Hudson, G.: Eosinophil granules and phosphotungstic acid: an electron microcope study of guinea-pig bone marrow. Exp. Cell Res. 41, 265–273 (1966).Google Scholar
  25. Hunter, R. L., Burstone, M. S.: The zymogram as a tool for the characterization of enzyme substrate specificity. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 8, 58–61 (1960).Google Scholar
  26. Ichikawa, Y.: Electron microscopic studies on the developing processes of granules of neutrophil leucocyte in normal and leukemic mice. Acta haemat. jap. 21, 885–895 (1958).Google Scholar
  27. Lockwood, W. R., Allison, F.: Electron micrographic studies of phagocytic cells. I. Morphological changes of the cytoplasm and granules of rabbit granulocytes associated with ingestion of rough pneumococcus. Brit. J. exp. Path. 44, 593–600 (1963).Google Scholar
  28. Mackin, J. G.: Oyster disease caused by Dermocystidium and other microorganisms in Louisiana. Publ. Inst. Mar. Sci. Univ. Texas, 7, 132–229 (1962).Google Scholar
  29. Movat, H. Z., Weiser, W. J., Glynn, M. F., Mustard, J. F.: Platelet phagocytosis and aggregation. J. Cell Biol. 27, 531–543 (1965).Google Scholar
  30. Nelson, T. C.: On the digestion of animal forms by the oysters. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. 30, 1287–1290 (1933).Google Scholar
  31. Novikoff, A. B., Essner, E., Quintana, N.: The golgi apparatus and lysosomes. Fed. Proc. 23, 1010–1022 (1964).Google Scholar
  32. Perkins, F. O.: Formation of centriole and centriole-like structures during meiosis and mitosis in Labyrinthula sp. (Rhizopodea, Labyrinthulida) An electron-microscope study. J. Cell Sci. 6, 629–653 (1970).Google Scholar
  33. Philpott, D. E., Chaet, A. B., Burnett, A. L.: A study of the secretory granules of the basal disk of Hydra. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 14, 74–84 (1966).Google Scholar
  34. Prytherch, H. F.: The life cycle and morphology of Nematopsis ostrearum sp. nov., a gregarine parasite of the mud crab and oyster. J. Morph. 66, 39–65 (1940).Google Scholar
  35. Rifkin, E., Cheng, T. C.: The origin, structure, and histochemical characterization of encapsulating cysts in the oyster Crassostrea virginica parasitized by the cestode Tylocephalum sp. J. Invertebrate Path. 10, 54–64 (1968).Google Scholar
  36. Spicer, D. D., Horn, R. G., Wetzel, B. K.: Ultrastructural and cytochemical characteristics of leucocytes in various stages of development. Biochem. Pharmacol., Suppl., 143–157 (1968).Google Scholar
  37. Stauber, L. A.: The fate of india ink injected intracardially into the oyster, Ostrea virginica Gmelin. Biol. Bull. 98, 227–241 (1950).Google Scholar
  38. Sutton, J. S.: Weiss, L.: Transformation of monocytes in tissue culture into macrophages, epithelioid cells, and multinucleated giant cells. An electron microscope study. J. Cell Biol. 28, 303–332 (1966).Google Scholar
  39. Takatsuki, S.: On the nature and functions of the amoebocytes of Ostrea edulis. Quart. J. micr. Sci. 76, 379–431 (1934).Google Scholar
  40. Tripp, M. R.: Disposal by the oyster of intracardially injected red blood cells of vertebrates. Proc. Nat. Shellfish. Ass. 48, 143–147 (1958).Google Scholar
  41. —: Mechanisms of removal of injected microorganisms from the American oyster, Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin). Biol. Bull. 199, 273–282 (1960).Google Scholar
  42. —, Bisignani, L. A., Kenny, M. T.: Oyster amoebocytes in vitro. J. Invertebrate Path. 8, 137–140 (1966).Google Scholar
  43. Winborn, W. B.: Dow epoxy resin with triallyl cyanurate, and similarly modified araldite and maraglas mixtures as embedding media for electron microscopy. Stain Technol. 40, 227–231 (1965).Google Scholar
  44. —, Bockman, D. E.: Origin of lysosomes in parietal cells. Lab. Invest. 19, 256–264 (1968).Google Scholar
  45. Yonge, C. M.: Structure and phyisology of the organs of feeding and digestion in Ostrea edulis. J. marine biol. Ass. 14, 295–386 (1926).Google Scholar
  46. Zucker-Franklin, D., Hirsch, J. G.: Electron microscopic studies on the degranulation of rabbit peritoneal leucocytes during phagocytosis. J. exp. Med. 120, 569–575 (1964).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Y. Feng
    • 1
  • J. S. Feng
    • 2
  • C. N. Burke
    • 3
  • L. H. Khairallah
    • 3
  1. 1.Marine Research Laboratory and Biological Sciences GroupUniversity of ConnecticutNoankUSA
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyRutgers, The State UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  3. 3.Department of Animal DiseasesUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations