Oecologia

, Volume 107, Issue 4, pp 463–468 | Cite as

Body size, litter size, timing of reproduction, and juvenile survival in the Unita ground squirrel, Spermophilus armatus

  • James F. Rieger
Ecophysiology

Abstract

The timing of reproduction affected litter size, offspring mass, and offspring survival in the Uinta ground squirrel, Spermophilus armatus, in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming. Survival of juvenile females to yearling age varied negatively with date of weaning and positively with individual offspring mass. At the same time, juveniles weaned early in the season were lighter, and juveniles weaned later in the season were heavier. The coefficient of variation for juvenile body mass, originally measured at weaning, significantly decreased by the time juveniles entered hibernation, indicating that individuals weaned early and light “caught up” in body mass to individuals weaned later and heavier. From the perspective of the mother's investment in the litter, litter size (corrected for mother's mass) decreased with later wcaning dates, while the relationship of weaning date to litter mass (corrected for mother's mass) was significant in only one year. Maternal allocation of resources in litters changed over the season so that mothers produced many, small offspring early in the season, and fewer, large offspring late in the season.

Key words

Spermophilus armatus Timing of reproduction Maternal allocation Juvenile mass Litter size 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson PK (1989) Dispersal in rodents: a resident fitness hypothesis (Special publication no. 9). American Society of Mammalogists, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Armitage KB (1981) Sociality as a life-history tactic of ground squirrels. Oecologia 48:36–49Google Scholar
  3. Armitage KB, Downhower JF, Svendsen GE (1976) Seasonal changes in weights of marmots. Am Midl Nat 96:36–51Google Scholar
  4. Charnov EL, Krebs JR (1974) On clutch size and fitness. Ibis 116: 217–219Google Scholar
  5. Dobson FS (1982) Competition for mates and predominant male dispersal in mammals. Anim Behav 30:1183–1192Google Scholar
  6. Dobson FS, Myers P (1989) The seasonal decline in the litter size of meadow voles. J Mammal, 70:142–152Google Scholar
  7. Dobson FS, Badry MJ, Geddes C (1992) Seasonal activity and body mass of Columbian ground squirrels. Can J Zool 70: 1364–1368Google Scholar
  8. Fleming TH, Rauscher RJ (1978) On the evolution of litter size in Peromyscus maniculatus. Evolution 32:45–55Google Scholar
  9. Foltz DW, Hoogland JL, Koscielny GM (1988) Effects of sex, litter size, and heterozygosity on juvenile weight in black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus). J Mammal 69:611–614Google Scholar
  10. Holekamp KE (1982) Dispersal in ground-dwelling sciurids. In: Murie JO, Michener GR (eds) The biology of ground-dwelling squirrels. The University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp 295–320Google Scholar
  11. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaufman DW, Kaufman GA (1987) Reproduction by Peromyscus polionotus: number, size and survival of offspring. J Mammal 68:275–280Google Scholar
  13. Klomp H (1970) The determination of clutch size in birds: a review. Ardea 58:1–124Google Scholar
  14. Lack DL (1947) The significance of clutch size. Ibis 89:302–352Google Scholar
  15. Lack DL (1948) Natural selection and family size in the starling. Evolution 2:95–110Google Scholar
  16. Lack DL (1954) The natural regulation of animal numbers. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewontin RC (1966) On the measurementof relative variability. Syst Zool 15:141–142Google Scholar
  18. Michener DR (1974) Annual cycle of activity and weight changes in Richardson's ground squirrel, Spermophilus richardsonii. Can Field Nat 88:409–413Google Scholar
  19. Michener GR (1984) Age, sex, and species differences in the annual cycles of ground-dwelling sciurids: implications for sociality. In: Murie JO, Michener GR (eds) The biology of ground-dwelling squirrels. The University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp 81–107Google Scholar
  20. Michener GR (1989) Reproductive effort during gestation and lactation by Richardson's ground squirrelsOecologia 78:77–86Google Scholar
  21. Michener GR, Locklear L (1990) Over-winter weight loss by Richardson's ground squirrels in relation to sexual differences in mating effort. J Mammal 71:489–499Google Scholar
  22. Murie JO, Boag DA (1984) The relationship of body weight to overwinter survival in Columbian ground squirrels. J Mammal 65:688–690Google Scholar
  23. Murie JO, Dobson FS (1987) The costs of reproduction in female Columbian ground squirrels. Oecologia 73:1–6Google Scholar
  24. Myers P, Master LL (1983) Reproduction by Peromyscus maniculatus: size and compromise. J Mammal 64:1–18Google Scholar
  25. Rieger JF (1991) Female investment strategies and reproductive success in the Uinta ground squirrel, Spermophilus armatus Ph. D. Dissertation, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  26. Sauer JR, Slade NA (1986) Size-dependent population dynamics of Microtus ochrogaster. Am Nat 127:902–908Google Scholar
  27. Sauer JR, Slade NA (1987) Uinta ground squirrel demography: is body mass a better categorical variable than age? Ecology 68: 642–650Google Scholar
  28. Slade NA, Balph DF (1974) Population ecologyof Uinta ground squirrels. Ecology 55:989–1003Google Scholar
  29. Smith CC, Fretwell SD (1974) The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am Nat 108:499–506Google Scholar
  30. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • James F. Rieger
    • 1
  1. 1.Conservation and Research CenterNational Zoological ParkFront RoyalUSA

Personalised recommendations