Oecologia

, Volume 107, Issue 4, pp 433–440

Effects of CO2 and nutrient enrichment on tissue quality of two California annuals

  • Celia C. Chu
  • Christopher B. Field
  • Harold A. Mooney
Ecophysiology

DOI: 10.1007/BF00333932

Cite this article as:
Chu, C.C., Field, C.B. & Mooney, H.A. Oecologia (1996) 107: 433. doi:10.1007/BF00333932

Abstract

The effects of CO2 enrichment and soil nutrient status on tissue quality were investigated and related to the potential effect on growth and decomposition. Two California annuals, Avena fatua and Plantago erecta, were grown at ambient and ambient plus 35 Pa atmospheric CO2 in nutrient unamended and amended serpentine soil. Elevated CO2 led to significantly increased Avena shoot nitrogen concentrations in the nutrient amended treatment. It also led to decreased lignin concentrations in Avena roots in both nutrient treatments, and in Plantago shoots and roots with nutrient addition. Concentrations of total nonstructural carbohydrate (TNC) and carbon did not change with elevated CO2 in either species. As a consequence of increased biomass accumulation, increased CO2 led to larger total pools of TNC, lignin, total carbon, and total nitrogen in Avena with nutrient additions. Doubling CO2 had no significant effect on Plantago. Given the limited changes in the compounds related to decomposibility and plant growth, effects of increased atmospheric CO2 mediated through tissue composition on Avena and Plantago are likely to be minor and depend on site fertility. This study suggests that other factors such as litter moisture, whether or not litter is on the ground, and biomass allocation among roots and shoots, are likely to be more important in this California grassland ecosystem. CO2 could influence those directly as well as indirectly.

Key words

Elevated CO2 Resource partitioning Carbon and nitrogen Carbohydrates Lignin 

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Celia C. Chu
    • 1
  • Christopher B. Field
    • 2
  • Harold A. Mooney
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plant BiologyCarnegie Institution of WashingtonStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations