Molecular and General Genetics MGG

, Volume 206, Issue 2, pp 192–199 | Cite as

Agrobacterium mediated transformation and regeneration of Populus

  • JoAnne J Fillatti
  • James Sellmer
  • Brent McCown
  • Bruce Haissig
  • Luca Comai
Article

Summary

A plant transformation and regeneration system has been developed for Populus species. Leaf explants, from stabilized shoot cultures of a Populus hybrid NC-5339 (Populus alba x grandidentata), were co-cultivated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens on a tobacco nurse culture. Both oncogenic and disarmed strains of A. tumefaciens harboring a binary vector which contained two neomycin phophotransferase II (NPT II′) and one bacterial 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate (EPSP) synthase (aroA) chimeric gene fusions were used. Shoots did not develop when leaf explants were co-cultivated with the binary disarmed strain of A. tumefaciens. However, transformed plants with and without the wild type T-DNA were obtained using an oncogenic binary strain of A. tumefaciens. Successful genetic transformation was confirmed by NPT II′ enzyme activity assays, Southern blot analysis and immunological detection of bacterial EPSP synthase by Western blotting. This is the first report of a successful recovery of transformed plants of a forest tree and also the first record of insertion and expression of a foreign gene of agronomic importance into a woody plant species.

Key words

Poplar Transformation Agrobacterium 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akinymiju OA, Isebrands JG, Nelson ND, Dickmann DI (1982) Use of glyphosate in the establishment of Populus in short rotation intensive culture. Proc North American Poplar Council Meeting, Rhinelander, WI. Kansas Sate University, Division of Extension, Manhattan, KansasGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker RF, Idler KB, Thompson DV, Kemp JD (1983) Nucleotide sequence of the T-DNA region from the Agrobacterium tumefaciens octopine Ti plasmid pTi 15955. Plant Mol Bio 2:335–350Google Scholar
  3. Bevan M, Flavell RB, Chilton M-D (1983) A chimeric antibiotic resistance gene as a selectable marker for plant cell transformation. Nature 304:184–187Google Scholar
  4. Buckley KJ (1985) Regulation and expression of the ΦX lysis gene. Ph.D Thesis, University of California, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  5. Chilton M-D, Currier TC, Farrand SK, Bendich AJ, Gordon MP, Nester EW (1974) Agrobacterium tumefaciens DNA and PS8 bacteriophage DNA not detected in crown gall tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:3672–3676Google Scholar
  6. Chilton M-D, Saiki RK, Yadav N, Gordon MP, Quetier F (1980) T-DNA from Agrobacterium Ti plasmid is in the nuclear DNA fraction of crown gall tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:4060–4064Google Scholar
  7. Christie, CB (1978) Rapid progagation of aspens and silver poplar using tissue culture techniques. Int Plant Prop Soc Proc 28:256–260Google Scholar
  8. Comai L, Sen L, Stalker D (1983) An altered aroA gene product confers resistance to the herbicide glyphosate. Science 221:370–371Google Scholar
  9. Comai L, Facciotti D, Hiatt WR, Thompson G, Rose R, Stalker D (1985) Expression in plants of a mutant aroA gene from Salmonella typhimurium confers tolerance to glyphosate. Nature 317:741–744Google Scholar
  10. Crossway A, Oakes JV, Irvine JM, Ward B, Knauf VC, Shewmaker, CK (1986) Integration of foreign DNA following micro-injection of tobacco mesophyll protoplasts. Mol Gen Genet 202:179–185Google Scholar
  11. DeGreve H, Leemans J, Hernalsteens J-P, Thia-Toong L, DeBeuckeleer M, Willmitzer L, Otten L, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1982) Regeneration of normal and fertile plants that express octopine synthase, from tobacco crown galls after deletion of tumour controlling functions. Nature 300:752–755Google Scholar
  12. Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983) A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1:19–21Google Scholar
  13. Depicker A, DeWilde M, Devos G, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1980) Molecular cloning of overlapping segments of the nopaline Ti-Plasmid pTiC58 as a means to restriction endonuclease mapping. Plasmid 3:193–211Google Scholar
  14. Fraley RT, Rogers SG, Horsch RB, Sanders P, Flick J, Adams S, Bittner M, Brand L, Fink C, Fry J, Galluppi G, Goldberg S, Hoffmann N, Woo S (1983) Expression of bacterial genes in plant cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:4803–4807Google Scholar
  15. Fromm ME, Taylor LP, Walbot V (1986) Stable transformation of maize after gene transfer by electroporation. Nature 319:791–793Google Scholar
  16. Hamilton RH, Fall MZ (1971) The loss of tumor initiating ability in Agrobacterium tumefaciens by inoculation at high temperature. Experientia 27:229–230Google Scholar
  17. Hansen EA, Netzer DA (1985) Weed control using herbicides in short-rotation intensively cultured Poplar plantations. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NC-260Google Scholar
  18. Herrera-Estrella L, Depicker A, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1983) Expression of chimeric genes transferred into plant cells using Ti plasmid-derived vector. Nature (London) 303:209–213Google Scholar
  19. Hoekema A, Hirsch PR, Hooykaas PJJ, Schilperoort RA (1983) A binary plant vector strategy based on separation of vir and T-region of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti-plasmid. Nature (London) 303:179–180Google Scholar
  20. Horsch RB, Fry JB, Hoffmann NL, Wallroth M, Eichholtz D, Rogers SG, Fragley RT (1985) A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science 227:1229–1231Google Scholar
  21. Keen PJ, Kerr A, New PB (1970) Crown gall of stone fruit: II, identification and nomenclature of Agrobacterium isolates. Aust J Biol Sci 23:585–595Google Scholar
  22. Maniatis T, Fritsche EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. McCormick S, Niedermeyer J, Fry J, Barnason A, Horsch R, Fraley R (1986) Leaf disc transformation of cultivated tomato (L. esculentum) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens Plant Cell Reports 5:81–84Google Scholar
  24. McCown BH (1984) From gene manipulation to forest establishment: shoot cultures of woody plants can be a central tool. TAPPI Research and Development Conference 21–26Google Scholar
  25. Melton DA, Krieg PA, Rebagliati, Maniatis T, Zinn K, Green MR (1984) Efficient in vitro synthesis of biologically active RNA and RNA hybridization probes from plasmids containing a bacteriophage SP6 promoter. Nucleic Acids Res 12:7035–7056Google Scholar
  26. Nelson ND, Haissig BE (1984) Biotechnology in the forest service's North central forest experiment station. In: Proc Int Symp Recent Advances in Forest Biotechnology, Traverse City, MI Biotechnology Institute, East Lansing, Michigan, pp 139–154Google Scholar
  27. Nelson ND, Haissig BE (1986) Herbicide stress: use of biotechnology to confer herbicide resistance to selected woody plants. In: Hennessy TC, Dougherty PM, Kossuth, Johnson JD (eds) Stress physiology and forest productivity. Martinus Mijoff/Dr W Junk Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands (in press)Google Scholar
  28. Otten LABM, Schilperoort RA (1978) A rapid micro scale method for the detection of Lysopine and nopaline dehydrogenase activities. Biochem Biophys Acta 527:497–499Google Scholar
  29. Parsons TJ, Sinkar VP, Stettler RF, Nester EW, Gordon MP (1986) Transformation of poplar by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Bio/Tech 4:533–536Google Scholar
  30. Paszkowski J, Shillito RD, Saul M, Mandak V, Hohn T, Hohn B, Potrykus I (1984) Direct gene transfer to plants. EMBO J 3:2717–2722Google Scholar
  31. Regier DA, Morris RO (1982) Secretion of trans zeatin by Agrobacterium tumefaciens: A function determined by the Nopaline Ti plasmid. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 104:1560–1566Google Scholar
  32. Reiss B, Sprengle R, Will H, Schaller H (1984) A new sensitive method for qualitative and quantitative assay of neomycin phosphotransferase in crude cell extracts. Gene 30:211–217Google Scholar
  33. Sciaky D, Montoya AL, Chilton MD (1978) Fingerprints of Agrobacterium Ti plasmids. Plasmid 1:228–253Google Scholar
  34. Sederoff RR, Ledig FT (1985) Increasing forest productivity and value through biotechnology. In: Ballard R (ed) Weyerhaeuser Science Symposium. Forest potentials productivity and value, proceedings. Weyerhaeuser Co Inc Centralia, WA, pp 253–276Google Scholar
  35. Sincich T (1982) Hypothesis Testing. In: Statistics by Example. Pellen, Santa Clara, CA, pp 313–362Google Scholar
  36. Smith MAL, McCown BH (1983) A comparison of source tissue for protoplast isolation from three woody plant species. Plant Sci Lett 28:149–156Google Scholar
  37. Watson B, Currier TC, Gordon MP, Chilton M-D, Nester EW (1975) Plasmid required for virulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol 123:255–264Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • JoAnne J Fillatti
    • 1
  • James Sellmer
    • 2
  • Brent McCown
    • 2
  • Bruce Haissig
    • 3
  • Luca Comai
    • 1
  1. 1.Calgene, Inc.DavisUSA
  2. 2.Department of HorticultureUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  3. 3.USDA Forest ServiceRhinelanderUSA

Personalised recommendations