Oecologia

, Volume 102, Issue 2, pp 189–201 | Cite as

Gradients of intertidal primary productivity around the coast of South Africa and their relationships with consumer biomass

  • Rodrigo H. Bustamante
  • George M. Branch
  • Sean Eekhout
  • Bruce Robertson
  • Peter Zoutendyk
  • Michael Schleyer
  • Arthur Dye
  • Nick Hanekom
  • Derek Keats
  • Michelle Jurd
  • Christopher McQuaid
Original Paper

Abstract

The structure of rocky intertidal communities may be influenced by large-scale patterns of productivity. In this study we examine the in situ rates of production by intertidal epilithic microalgae (chlorophyll a production per unit area per month), intertidal nutrient concentrations (nitrates, nitrites, phosphates and silicates), and standing stocks of different functional-form groups of macroalgae around the South African coast, and their relationships to consumer biomass. Clear gradients of in situ intertidal primary production and nutrient concentrations were recorded around the South African coast, values being highest on the west coast, intermediate on the south and lowest on the east coast. Primary production by intertidal epilithic microalgae was correlated with nutrient availability and could also be related to nearshore phytoplankton production. The dominance patterns of different functional forms of macroalgae changed around the coast, with foliose algae prevalent on the west coast and coralline algae on the east coast. However, overall macroalgal standing stocks did not reflect the productivity gradient, being equally high on the east and west coasts, and low in the south. Positive relationships existed between the average biomass of intertidal intertebrate consumers (grazers and filter-feeders) and intertidal productivity, although only the grazers were directly “connected” to in situ production by epilithic intertidal microalgae. The maximum body size of a widely distributed limpet, Patella granularis, was also positively correlated with level of in situ primary production. The maximal values of biomass attained by intertidal filter-feeders were not related to intertidal primary production, and were relatively constant around the coast. At a local scale, filter-feeder biomass is known to be strongly influenced by wave action. This implies that the local-scale water movements over-ride any effects that large-scale gradients of primary production may have on filter-feeders. The large-scale gradient in intertidal productivity around the coast is thus strongly linked with grazer biomass and individual body size, but any effect it has on filter-feeder biomass seems subsidiary to the local effects of wave action.

Key words

Intertidal Productivity Nutrient gradients Community Consumers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boer JA de (1982) Nutrients. In: Loban CS, Wynn MJ (eds). The biology of seaweeds. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 356–365Google Scholar
  2. Bosman AL (1988) The influence of primary production rate on the dynamics of Patella granularis, an intertidal limpet. Publicazioni della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli I: Mar Ecol 9:181–198Google Scholar
  3. Bosman AL, Hockey PAR (1986) Seabird guano as a determinant of rocky intertidal community structure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 32:247–257Google Scholar
  4. Bosman AL, Hockey PAR (1988) Life-history patterns of populations of the limpet Patella granularis: the dominant roles of food supply and mortality rate. Oecologia 75:412–419Google Scholar
  5. Bosman AL, Toit JT du, Hockey PAR, Branch GM (1986) A field experiment demonstrating the influence of seabird guano on intertidal primary production. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 23:283–294Google Scholar
  6. Bosman AL, Hockey PAR, Siegfried WR (1987) The influence of coastal upwelling on the functional structure of rocky intertidal communities. Oecologia 72:226–232Google Scholar
  7. Branch GM (1975) Mechanisms reducing intraspecific competition in Patella spp: migration, differentiation and territorial behaviour. J Anim Ecol 44:575–600Google Scholar
  8. Branch GM (1985) Limpets: their role in littoral and sublittoral community dynamics. In: Moore PG, Seed D (eds) The ecology of rocky coasts. Hodder and Stoughton, England, pp 97–116Google Scholar
  9. Branch GM, Branch ML (1980) Experimental analysis of intraspecific competition in an intertidal gastropod Littorina unifasciata. Aus J Mar Freshwater Res 32:573–589Google Scholar
  10. Brown PC (1992) Spatial and seasonal variation in chlorophyll distribution in the upper 30 m of the photic zone in the southern Benguela/Agulhas ecosystem. S Afr J Mar Sci 12:515–525Google Scholar
  11. Brown PC, Cochrane KL (1991) chlorophyll-a distribution in the southern Benguela, possible effects of global warming on phytoplankton and its implications for pelagic fish. S Afr J Mar Sci 87:233–242Google Scholar
  12. Brown PC, Painting SJ, Cochrane KL (1991) Estimates of phytoplankton and bacterial biomass and production in the northern and southern Benguela ecosystems. S Afr J Mar Sci 11:5137–5164Google Scholar
  13. Burger LF (1990) The distribution patterns and community structure of the Tsitsikamma rocky littoral ichthyofauna. M Sc thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamtown, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  14. Bustamante RH (1994) Patterns and causes of intertidal community structure around the coast of Southern Africa. Ph D thesis, University of Cape Town, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  15. Bustamante RH, Getz WM, Branch GM (1994) Analysis of a limpet fishery using a metaphysiological stand-growth model. Natural Resource Modeling 8:139–161Google Scholar
  16. Bustamante RH, Branch GM, Eckhout (1995) Maintenance of an exceptional frazer biomass on South African intertidal shores: trophic subsidy by subtidal kelps. Ecology (in press)Google Scholar
  17. Carpenter SR, Kitchell JK (1984) Plankton community structure and limnetic primary production. Am Nat 124:159–172Google Scholar
  18. Carpenter SR, Kitchell JK (1984) Plankton community structure and limnetic primary production. Am Nat 124:159–172Google Scholar
  19. Carpenter SR, Kitchell JK (1987) The temporal scale of variance in limnetic primary production. Am Nat 129:417–433Google Scholar
  20. Castenholz RW (1963) An experimental study of the vertical distribution of littoral marine diatoms. Limnol Oceanogr 8:450–462Google Scholar
  21. Cliff G (1982a) Seasonal variation in the contribution of phytoplankton, bacteria, detritus and inorganic nutrients to a rocky shore ecosystem. Trans R Soc S Afr 44:523–538Google Scholar
  22. Cliff G (1982b) Dissolved and particulate matter in the surface waters of False Bay and its influence on a rocky shore. Trans R Soc S Afr 44:539–549Google Scholar
  23. Coetzee DJ, Zoutendyk P (1994) Species composition, distribution and standing stock of rocky-shore intertidal communities in the De Hoop marine reserve. Bontebok 8:1–21Google Scholar
  24. DeAngelis DL (1992) Dynamics of nutrient cycling and food webs. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Demers S, Therriault JC, Bouget E, Desilets D (1989) Small-scale gradients of phytoplankton productivity in the littoral fringe. Mar Biol 100:393–399Google Scholar
  26. Dye AH, White DRA (1991) Intertidal microalgal production and molluscan herbivory in relation to season and elevation on two rocky shores in the east coast of southern Africa. S Afr J Mar Sci 11:483–844Google Scholar
  27. Elst R van der (1990) A guide to the common sea fishes of southern Africa. Struik, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  28. Emanuel BP, Bustamante RH, Branch GM, Eekhout S, Odendaal FJ (1992) A zoogeographic and functional approach to the selection of marine reserves on the west coast of Africa. S Afr J Mar Sci 12:341–368Google Scholar
  29. Hatcher BG (1990) Coral reef primary productivity: a hierarchy of pattern and process. Trends Ecol Evol 5:149–155Google Scholar
  30. Hawkins SJ, Hartnoll RG (1983) Grazing of intertidal algae by marine invertebrates. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 21:195–289Google Scholar
  31. Hay ME (1981) The functional morphology of turf-forming seaweeds: persistence in stressful marine habitats. Ecology 62:739–750Google Scholar
  32. Hill AS, Hawkins SJ (1990) An investigation of methods for sampling microbial films on rocky shores. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 70:77–88Google Scholar
  33. Hill AS, Hawkins SJ (1991) Seasonal and spatial variation of epilithic microalgal distribution and abundance and its ingestion by Patella vulgata on a moderately exposed rocky shore. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 71:403–423Google Scholar
  34. Hill WR, Boston HL, Steinman AD (1992) Grazers and nutrients simultaneously limit lotic primary productivity. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:504–512Google Scholar
  35. HMSO (1986) The determination of chlorophyll a in aquatic environments. In: Methods for the examination of water and associated materials, vol 4, section 2. HMSO, London, pp 6–13Google Scholar
  36. Howarth RW (1988) Nutrient limitation of net primary production in marine ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19:89–110Google Scholar
  37. Hutchinson GE (1955) The biogeochemistry of vertebrate excretion. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 96:134–151Google Scholar
  38. Jeffrey SW, Humphrey GF (1975) New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophylls a, b, c 1and c 2in higher plants, algae and natural phytoplankton. Biochem Physiol Pflanz 167:191–194Google Scholar
  39. Jørgensen CB (1990) Bivalve filter feeding: hydrodynamics, bioenergetics, physiology and ecology. Olsen and Olsen, FredensborgGoogle Scholar
  40. Lasiak TA, White DRA (1993) Microalgal food resources and competitive interactions among the intertidal limpets Cellana capensis (Gmelin, 1791) and Siphonaria concinna (Sowerby 1824). S Afr J Mar Sci 13:97–108Google Scholar
  41. Legendre LS, Demers S, Lefaivre S (1986) Biological production at marine ergoclines. In: Nihoul JCJ (ed) Marine interfaces ecohydrodynamics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–54Google Scholar
  42. Leibold MA (1989) Resource edibility and the effects of predators and productivity on the outcome of trophic interactions. Am Nat 134:922–949Google Scholar
  43. Littler MM, Arnold KE (1982) Primary productivity of marine macroalgal functional-form groups from southwestern North America. J Phycol 18:307–311Google Scholar
  44. Littler MM, Littler DS (1980) The evolution of thallus form and survival strategies in benthic marine macroalgal functional form groups model. Am Nat 116:25–44Google Scholar
  45. Littler MM, Littler DS (1984) Relationships between macroalgal functional form groups and substrata stability in subtropical rocky-intertidal systems. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 74:13–34Google Scholar
  46. Littler MM, Littler DS (1988) Structure and role of algae in tropical reef. In: Lembi CA, Waaland JR (eds) Algae and human affairs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 29–56Google Scholar
  47. MacLulich JH (1986a) Colonization of bare rock surfaces by microflora in a rocky intertidal habitat. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 32:91–96Google Scholar
  48. MacLulich JH (1986b) Experimental evaluation of methods for sampling and assaying intertidal epilithic microalgae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 34:275–280Google Scholar
  49. MacLulich JH (1987) Variation in the density and variety of intertidal epilithic microflora. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 40:285–293Google Scholar
  50. Mann KH (1988) Production and use of detritus in various freshwater, estuarine, and coastal marine ecosystems. Limnol Oceanogr 33:910–930Google Scholar
  51. Mann KH, Lazier JRN (1991) Dynamics of marine ecosystems. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  52. McQuaid CD (1981) The establishment and maintenance of vertical size gradients in populations of Littorina africana knysnaensis (Phillipi) on an exposed shore. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 54:77–89Google Scholar
  53. McQuaid CD, Branch GM (1985) Trophic structure of rocky intertidal communities: response to wave action and implications for energy flow. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 22:153–161Google Scholar
  54. Menge BA (1992) Community regulation: under what conditions are bottom-up factors important on rocky shores? Ecology 73:755–765Google Scholar
  55. Menge BA, Olson AM (1990) Role of scale and environmental factors in regulation of community. Trends Ecol Evol 5:52–67Google Scholar
  56. Menge BA, Sutherland JP (1987) Community regulation: variation in disturbance, competition, and predation in relation to environmental stress and recruitment. Am Nat 130:730–757Google Scholar
  57. Moloney CL (1992) Simulation studies of trophic flows and nutrient cycles in Benguela upwelling foodwebs. S Afr J Mar Sci 12:457–476Google Scholar
  58. Mostert SA (1983) Procedures used in South Africa for the automatic photometric determination of micronutrients in sea water. S Afr J Mar Sci 1:189–198Google Scholar
  59. Mostert SA (1988) Notes on improvements and modifications to the automatic methods for determining micronutrients in sea water. S Afr J Mar Sci 7:295–298Google Scholar
  60. Nicotri ME (1977) Grazing effects of four marine intertidal herbivores on the microflora. Ecology 58:1020–1032Google Scholar
  61. Payne AIL, Crawford JM (1989) Oceans of life off southern Africa. Vlaeberg, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  62. Power ME (1992) Top-down and bottom-up forces in food webs: do plants have primacy? Ecology 73:733–746Google Scholar
  63. Raffaclli DG (1979) The grazer-alga interaction in the intertidal zone on New Zeland rocky shores. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 38:81–100Google Scholar
  64. Raine RC, Patching JW (1980) Aspects of carbon and nitrogen cycling in a shallow marine environment. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 47:127–140Google Scholar
  65. Redfield AC (1958) The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. Am Sci 46:205–222Google Scholar
  66. SAS (1986) SAS System for linear models, 1986 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  67. Schleyer MH (1981) Micro-organisms and detritus in the water column of a subtidal reef of Natal. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 4:307–320Google Scholar
  68. Schumann EH, Perrins L-A, Hunter IT (1982) Upwelling along the south coast of the Cape Province, South Africa. S Afr J Sci 78:238–242Google Scholar
  69. Shannon LV (1985) The Benguela ecosystem. I. Evolution of the Benguela. Physical features and processes. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 23:105–182Google Scholar
  70. Shannon LV (1989) The physical environment. In: Payne AIL, Crawford JM (eds) Oceans of life off southern Africa. Vlaeberg, Cape Town, pp 12–27Google Scholar
  71. Stanley EH, Short RA, Harrison JW, Hall R, Wiedfield RC (1990) Variation in nutrient limitation of lotic and lentic algal communities in Texas (USA) river. Hydrobiologia 206:61–71Google Scholar
  72. Steneck RS, Dethier MN (1994) A functional group approach to the structure of algal dominated communities. Oikos 69:476–498Google Scholar
  73. Steneck RS, Watling L (1982) Feeding capabilities and limitation of herbivorous molluscs: a functional group approach. Mar Biol 68:299–319Google Scholar
  74. Steneck RS, Hacker SD, Dethier MN (1991) Mechanisms of competitive dominance between crustose coralline algae: an herbivore-mediated competitive reversal. Ecology 72:938–950Google Scholar
  75. Stuart V (1982) Absorbed ratio, respiratory coast and resultant scope for growth in the mussel Aulacomya ater (Molina) fed on a diet of kelp detritus of different ages. Mar Biol Lett 3:289–306Google Scholar
  76. Stuart V, Klumpp DW (1984) Evidence for food-resource partitioning by kelp-bed filter-feeders. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 16:27–37Google Scholar
  77. Underwood AJ (1984a) The vertical distribution and seasonal abundance of intertidal microalgae on a rocky shore in New South Wales. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 78:199–220Google Scholar
  78. Underwood AJ (1984b) Vertical and seasonal patterns in competition between intertidal gastropods. Oecologia 64:211–222Google Scholar
  79. Underwood AJ (1984c) Microalgal food and the growth of the intertidal gastropods Nerita atramentosa Reeve and Bembicium nanum (Lamarck) at four heights on a shore. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 79:277–291Google Scholar
  80. Underwood AJ, Jernakoff P (1981) Effects of interactions between algae and grazing gastropods on the structure of a low shore intertidal algal community. Oecologia 48:221–233Google Scholar
  81. Vadas RL (1985) Herbivory. In: Littler MM, Littler DS (eds) Ecological field methods: macroalgae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 531–572Google Scholar
  82. Wootton TJ, Power ME (1993) Productivity, consumers, and the structure of a river food chain. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 90:1384–1387Google Scholar
  83. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analyses. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rodrigo H. Bustamante
    • 1
  • George M. Branch
    • 1
  • Sean Eekhout
    • 1
  • Bruce Robertson
    • 2
  • Peter Zoutendyk
    • 3
  • Michael Schleyer
    • 4
  • Arthur Dye
    • 5
  • Nick Hanekom
    • 6
  • Derek Keats
    • 7
  • Michelle Jurd
    • 7
  • Christopher McQuaid
    • 8
  1. 1.Coastal Ecology Unit, Zoology DepartmentUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa
  2. 2.Botany DepartmentUniversity of Port ElizabethPort ElizabethSouth Africa
  3. 3.EMETEK, CSIRStellenboschSouth Africa
  4. 4.Oceanographic Research InstituteDurbanSouth Africa
  5. 5.Zoology DepartmentUniversity of TranskeiUmtataSouth Africa
  6. 6.Tsitsikamma National ParkStorms RiverSouth Africa
  7. 7.Botany DepartmentUniversity of Western CapeCape TownSouth Africa
  8. 8.Department of Zoology and EntomologyRhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations