, Volume 108, Issue 1, pp 88–94 | Cite as

Clutch size manipulations in two seed beetles: consequences for progeny fitness

  • Chales W. Fox
  • John D. Martin
  • Monica S. Thakar
  • Timothy A. Mousseau
Population Ecology


Seed beetles (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) lay their eggs on discrete resource patches, such that competition among larvae for food is an important component of their biology. Most seed beetles, including Stator limbatus, lay eggs singly on individual seeds and avoid superparasitism except when seeds are limiting. In contrast, S. beali, a closely related congener, lays eggs in clutches on a single seed. We tested the hypothesis that natural selection on larval life history characters favors small clutches (selection against large clutches) in S. limbatus, but that selection against large clutches is relaxed in S. beali because of the large size of its host's seeds. We manipulated clutch size and examined its relationship to offspring fitness. Clutch size affected the survivorship of S. limbatus larvae(r2=0.14), but had no detectable effect on the survivorship of S. beali larvae (r2=0.04). Also, clutch size had a large effect on development time and body weight of S. limbatus, but not of S. beali. We discuss the implications of this result for the evolution of clutch size in S. limbatus and S. beali.

Key words

Bruchidae Resource patches Clutch size Larval survival Larval development 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Courtney SP (1984) Evolution of egg clustering by butterflies and other insects. Am Nat 123:276–281Google Scholar
  2. Fox CW (1993) The influence of maternal age and mating frequency on egg size and offspring perfomance in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Oecologia 96:139–146Google Scholar
  3. Fox CW, Mousseau TA (1995a) Experimental hybridizations between two seed beetle species (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): asymmetrical reproductive isolation between Stator limbatus and S. beali. Coleopt Bull, in pressGoogle Scholar
  4. Fox CW, Mousseau TA (1995b) Determinants of clutch size and seed preference in a seed beetle (Stator beali). Environ Entomol 24:1557–1561Google Scholar
  5. Fox CW, Mousseau TA (1996) Larval host plant affects the fitness consequences of egg size in the seed beetle Stator limbatus. Oecologia (in press)Google Scholar
  6. Fox CW, Waddell KJ, Mousseau TA (1994) Host-associated fitness variation in a seed beetle (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): Evidence for local adaptation to a poor quality host. Oecologia 99:329–336Google Scholar
  7. Fox CW, Harbin AD, Mousseau TA (1995a) Suitability of a non-host palo verde for development of Stator limbatus (Coleoptera; Bruchidae) larvae. Pan-Pac Entomol, in pressGoogle Scholar
  8. Fox CW, McLennan LA, Mousseau TA (1995b) Male body size affects female lifetime reproductive success in a seed beetle. Anim Behav 50:281–284Google Scholar
  9. Fox CW, Waddell KJ, Mousseau TA (1995c) Parental host plant affects offspring life histories in a seed beetle. Ecology 76: 402–411Google Scholar
  10. Godfray HCJ (1987) The evolution of clutch size in parasitic wasps. Am Not 129:221–233Google Scholar
  11. Godfray HJC, Partridge L, Harvey PH (1991) Clutch size. Annu Rev Ecol Syste 22:409–429Google Scholar
  12. Hardy ICW, Griffiths NT, Godfray HCJ (1992) Clutch size in a parasitoid wasp: a manipulation experiment. J Anim Ecol 61: 121–129Google Scholar
  13. Johnson CD, Kingsolver JM (1976) Systematics of Stator of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). USDA Tech Bull 1537:1–101Google Scholar
  14. Johnson CD, Kingsolver JM, Teran AL (1989) Sistematica del genero Stator (Insecta: Coleoptera: Bruchidae) en Sudamerica. Op Lilloana 37:1–105Google Scholar
  15. Mangel M (1987) Ovipostion site selection and clutch size in insects. J Math Biol 25:1–22Google Scholar
  16. Messina FJ (1991) Life-history variation in a seed beetle: adult egg-laying vs. larval competitive ability. Oecologia 85:447–455Google Scholar
  17. Messina FJ, Mitchell R (1989) Intraspecific variation in the eggspacing behavior of the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. J Insect Behav 2:727–742Google Scholar
  18. Messina FJ, Kemp JL, Dickinson JA (1992)Plasticity in egg-spacing behavior of a seed beetle: effects of host deprivation and seed patchiness (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J Insect Behav 5: 609–621Google Scholar
  19. Nilsson JA, Johnson CD (1993) Laboratory hybridization of Stator beali and S. limbatus, with new host records for S. limbatus and Mimosestes amicus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Southwest Nat 38:385–387Google Scholar
  20. Parker GA, Courtney SP (1984) Models of clutch size in insect oviposition. Theor Popul Biol 26:27–48Google Scholar
  21. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:203–208Google Scholar
  22. Siemens DH, Johnson CD (1992) Density-dependent egg parasitism as a determinant of clutch size in bruchid beetles (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Environ Entomol 21:610–619Google Scholar
  23. Vet LEM, Datema A, Welzen K van, Snellen H (1993) Clutch size in a larval-pupal endoparasitoid. 1. Variation across and within host species. Oecologia 95:410–415Google Scholar
  24. Vet LEM, Datema A, Janssen A, Snellen H (1994) Clutch size in a larval-pupal endoparasitoid: consequences for fitness. J Anim Ecol 63:807–815Google Scholar
  25. Wilson K (1994) Evolution of clutch size in insects. II. A test of static optimality models using the beetle Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J Evol Biol 7:365–386Google Scholar
  26. Wilson K, Lessells CM (1994) Evolution of clutch size in insects. I. A review of static optimality models. J Evol Biol 7:339–363Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chales W. Fox
    • 1
  • John D. Martin
    • 1
  • Monica S. Thakar
    • 1
  • Timothy A. Mousseau
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology of Biological SciencesUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.The Louis Calder Center of Fordham UniversityArmonkUSA

Personalised recommendations