Advertisement

Molecular and General Genetics MGG

, Volume 114, Issue 2, pp 134–143 | Cite as

A novel transducing phage

Its role in recognition of a possible new host-controlled modification system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
  • V. Krishnapillai
Article

Summary

Two newly isolated generalized transducing phages, F126 and F130, are in many respects similar to the previously described phage F116 of P. aeruginosa strain PAO. They also share with F116 the property of not responding to host-specific restriction in strain PAO. However, while the transduction ability of phages F116 and F130 is also inert to PAO-specific restriction, transduction mediated by phage F126 is 8–120 fold reduced in restrictive conditions. In experiments designed to explore the conditions necessary to obtain restriction in F126 transduction it was found that it differed from those previously known to specify host-controlled restriction in P. aeruginosa PAO (Rolfe and Holloway, 1968). These observations suggest that more than one independent restriction system operates in strain PAO.

Keywords

F116 Restrictive Condition Restriction System Generalize Transduce Transduce Phage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, M. H.: Bacteriophages. New York: Interscience Publ. 1959.Google Scholar
  2. Arber, W.: Host specificity of DNA produced by Escherichia coli: III. Effects on transduction mediated by λ dg. Virology 23, 173–182 (1964).Google Scholar
  3. Arber, W., Linn, S.: DNA modification and restriction. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 38, 467–500 (1969).Google Scholar
  4. —, Morse, M., L.: Host specificity to DNA produced by Escherichia coli: VI. Effects on bacterial conjugation. Genetics 51, 137–148 (1965).Google Scholar
  5. Colson, C., Colson, A. M., Pel, A. van: Host-controlled restriction mutants of Salmonella typhimurium. J. gen. Microbiol. 58, 57–64 (1969).Google Scholar
  6. Copeland, J. C., Bryson, V.: Restrictions in matings of Escherichia coli strain K-12 with strain B. Genetics 54, 441–452 (1966).Google Scholar
  7. Dunn, N. W., Holloway, B. W.: Transduction and host controlled modification—The role of the phage. Symp. Uptake of Informative Molecules by Living Cells., Brussels, in press (1970).Google Scholar
  8. Dunn, N. W., Holloway, B. W.: Pleiotrophy of p-fluorophenylalaline resistant and antibiotic hyper-sensitive mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Genet. Res. in press (1971).Google Scholar
  9. Falkow, S., Formal, S. B.: Restriction in genetic crosses between Escherichia coli and Shigella flexneri. J. Bact. 100, 540–541 (1969).Google Scholar
  10. Ford, E., Boyer, H. W.: Degradation of enteric bacterial deoxyribonucleic acid by the Escherichia coli B. restriction endonuclease. J. Bact. 104, 594–595 (1970).Google Scholar
  11. Hattman, S.: DNA methylation of T-even bacteriophages and of their nonglucosylated mutants. Its role in P1-directed restriction. Virology 42, 359–367 (1970).Google Scholar
  12. Holloway, B. W.: Genetic recombination in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. gen. Microbiol. 13, 572–581 (1955).Google Scholar
  13. —: Genetics of Pseudomonas. Bact. Rev. 33, 419–443 (1969).Google Scholar
  14. —, Egan, J. B., Monk, M.: Lysogeny in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 38, 321–330 (1960).Google Scholar
  15. Holloway, B. W.: Krishnapillai, V., Stanisich, V.: Pseudomonas genetics. Ann. Rev. Genet. in press (1971).Google Scholar
  16. —, Rolfe, B.: Host genome control in host induced modification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa phages. Virology 23, 595–602 (1964).Google Scholar
  17. Isaac, J. H., Holloway, B. W.: Control of pyrimidine biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bact. 96., 1732–1741 (1968).Google Scholar
  18. Ketyi, J., Orskov, F.: Host-controlled modification and restriction of foreign chromosomal and plasmid DNA in Shigella flexneri strains. Acta path. microbiol. scand., Sect. B 78, 51–58 (1970).Google Scholar
  19. Mee, B. J., Lee, B. T. O.: A map order for hisI, one of the genetic regions controlling histidine biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, using the transducing phage F116. Genetics 62, 687–696 (1969).Google Scholar
  20. Okada, M., Watanabe, T., Miyake, T.: On the nature of the recipient ability of Salmonella typhimurium for foreign deoxyribonucleic acids. J. gen. Microbiol. 50, 241–242 (1968).Google Scholar
  21. Revel, H. R., Luria, S. E.: DNA-glucosylation in T-even phage: genetic determination and role in phage-host interaction. Ann. Rev. Genet. 4, 177–192 (1970).Google Scholar
  22. Rolfe, B., Holloway, B. W.: Genetic control of DNA specificity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Genet. Res. 12, 94–102 (1968).Google Scholar
  23. —: Host specificity of DNA and conjugation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Genetics 61, 341–349 (1969).Google Scholar
  24. Stanisich, V., Holloway, B. W.: Conjugation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Genetics 61, 327–339 (1969).Google Scholar
  25. Vogel, H. J., Bonner, D. M.: Acetylornithase of Escherichia coli: partial purification and some properties. J. biol. Chem. 218, 97–106 (1956).Google Scholar
  26. Weinfeld, H., Paigen, K.: Host controlled modification of the transducing activities of lambda phage. Virology 28, 363–368 (1966).Google Scholar
  27. Wood, W. B.: Host specificity of DNA produced by Escherichia coli: Bacterial mutations affecting the restriction and modification of DNA. J. molec. Biol. 16, 118–133 (1966).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Krishnapillai
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeneticsMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations