Molecular and General Genetics MGG

, Volume 133, Issue 4, pp 283–291 | Cite as

Slow excision repair in an mfd mutant of Escherichia coli B/r

  • Donna L. George
  • Evelyn M. Witkin
Article

Summary

A mutant of Escherichia coli B/r designated mfd is very deficient in the ability to exhibit “mutation frequency decline”, the characteristic loss of potential suppressor mutations which occurs when protein synthesis is briefly inhibited after irradiation with ultraviolet light (UV). This mutant is known to excise pyrimidine dimers at an abnormally slow rate, although it is as UV-resistant as its mfd+ B/r parent strain. We have found that the mfd mutant performs the initial incision step of excision repair normally, but repairs the resulting single-strand breaks much more slowly than the mfd+ strain. We conclude that the mfd mutant performs the excision step of pyrimidine dimer excision inefficiently, but our data do not rule out the possibility that one or more subsequent steps of repair may also be slow. In spite of the slow dimer excision in the mfd mutant, single-strand DNA breaks do not accumulate during post-irradiation incubation, implying that incision and excision are well coordinated. The prolonged post-irradiation lag in cell division and DNA synthesis which accompany slow excision in the mfd strain indicates that resumption of these processes at optimal rates is linked to the timing of excision repair. The normal UV-resistance of the mfd mutant also suggests such coordination and shows that the rate of excision repair is independent of its ultimate efficiency.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bridges, B. A.: Mechanisms of radiation mutagenesis in cellular and subcellular systems. Ann. Rev. nuclear Sci. 19, 139–178 (1969)Google Scholar
  2. Bridges, B. A., Dennis, R. E., Munson, R. J.: Differential induction and repair of ultraviolet damage leading to true reversions and external suppressor mutations of an ochre codon in Escherichia coli B/r WP2. Genetics 57, 897–908 (1967)Google Scholar
  3. Chase, J. W., Richardson, C. C.: Purification and properties of a new exonuclease from Escherichia coli. Fed. Proc. 32, 619 (1973)Google Scholar
  4. Clarke, C. H.: Influence of cellular physiology on the realization of mutations—results and prospects. In: G. E. W. Wolstenholme and M. O'Connor (eds.), Ciba Foundation Symposium on Mutation as Cellular Process, p. 17–35. London:Churchill 1969Google Scholar
  5. Doudney, C. O., Haas, F. L.: Modification of ultraviolet-induced mutation frequency and survival in bacteria by post-irradiation treatment. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 44, 390–401 (1958)Google Scholar
  6. Doudney, C. O., Young, C. S.: Ultraviolet light induced mutation and deoxyribonucleic acid replication in bacteria. Genetics 47, 1125–1138 (1962)Google Scholar
  7. Kelly, R. F., Atkinson, M. R., Huberman, J. A., Kornberg, A.: Excision of thymine dimers and other mismatched sequences by DNA polymerase of Escherichia coli. Nature (Lond.) 224, 495–501 (1969)Google Scholar
  8. Kondo, S., Ichikawa, H., Iwo, K., Kato, T.: Base-change mutagenesis and prophage induction in strains of Escherichia coli with different DNA repair capacities. Genetics 66, 187–217 (1970)Google Scholar
  9. Lomax, M. S., Greenberg, G. R.: Characteristics of the deo operon: role in thymine utilization and sensitivity to deoxyribonucleosides. J. Bact. 96, 501–514 (1968)Google Scholar
  10. McGrath, R. A., Williams, R. W.: Reconstruction in vivo of irradiated Escherichia coli deoxyribonucleic acid; the rejoining of broken pieces. Nature (Lond.) 212, 534–535 (1966)Google Scholar
  11. Osborn, M., Person, S.: Characterization of revertants of E. coli WU36-10 and WP2 using amber mutants and an ochre mutant of bacteriophage T4. Mutation Res. 4, 504–507 (1967)Google Scholar
  12. Patterson, M. C., Boyle, J. M., Setlow, R. B.: Ultraviolet-and X-ray induced responses of a deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase-deficient mutant of Escherichia coli. J. Bact. 107, 61–67 (1971)Google Scholar
  13. Radman, M., Errera, M.: Enhanced efficiency of repair of nonreplicated UV-damaged E. coli DNA. Mutation Res. 9, 553–560 (1970)Google Scholar
  14. Rupp, W. D., Wilde III, C. E., Reno, D. L., Howard-Flanders, P.: Exchanges between DNA strands in ultraviolet-irradiated Escherichia coli. J. molec. Biol. 61, 25–44 (1971)Google Scholar
  15. Sedgwick, S. G., Bridges, B. A.: Survival, mutation and capacity to repair single-strand DNA breaks after gamma irradiation in different Exr- strains of Escherichia coli. Molec. gen. Genet. 119, 93–102 (1972)Google Scholar
  16. Setlow, J. K.: The molecular basis of biological effects of ultraviolet irradiation and photoreactivation. In: M. Ebert and A. Howard (eds.), Current topics in radiation research, vol. II, p. 195–248. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co. 1966Google Scholar
  17. Setlow, R. B.: Repair of DNA. In: V. V. Koningsberger and L. Bosch (eds.), Regulation of nucleic acid and protein biosynthesis, p. 51–62. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Co. 1967Google Scholar
  18. Smith, K. C.: DNA synthesis in sensitive and resistant mutants of Escherichia coli B after ultraviolet irradiation. Mutation Res. 8, 481–495 (1969)Google Scholar
  19. Stacey K. A., Simson, E.: Improved method for the isolation of thymine requiring mutants of Escherichia coli. J. Bact. 90, 554–555 (1965)Google Scholar
  20. Witkin, E. M.: Time, temperature and protein synthesis: a study of ultraviolet-induced mutation in bacteria. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 21, 123–140 (1956)Google Scholar
  21. Witkin, E. M.: Radiation induced mutations and their repair. Science 152, 1345–1353 (1966)Google Scholar
  22. Witkin, E. M.: Ultraviolet-induced mutation and DNA repair. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 23, 487–514 (1969)Google Scholar
  23. Witkin, E. M.: Thermal enhancement of ultraviolet mutability in a tif-1 uvrA derivative of Escherichia coli B/r: Evidence that ultraviolet mutagenesis depends upon an inducible function. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 71, 1930–1934 (1974)Google Scholar
  24. Witkin, E. M., Thiel, E. C.: The effect of post-treatment with chloramphenicol on various ultraviolet-induced mutations in Escherichia coli. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 46, 226–231 (1960)Google Scholar
  25. Witkin, E. M., Wermundsen, I. E.: Do ultraviolet-induced mutations to streptomycin resistance exhibit susceptibility to mutation frequency decline? Mutation Res. 19, 261–264 (1973)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donna L. George
    • 1
  • Evelyn M. Witkin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences, Douglass CollegeRutgers UniversityNew Brunswick

Personalised recommendations