Molecular and General Genetics MGG

, Volume 209, Issue 3, pp 499–507 | Cite as

Molecular analysis of paramutant plants of Antirrhinum majus and the involvement of transposable elements

  • Enno Krebbers
  • Reinhard Hehl
  • Ralf Piotrowiak
  • Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig
  • Hans Sommer
  • Heinz Saedler
Article

Summary

Paramutation is observed when the Antirrhinum majus lines 44 and 53 are crossed. These two lines both have insertions at the nivea locus, which encodes chalcone synthase (chs). The allele niv-53 carries the transposable element Tam1 in the promoter region of the chs gene; niv-44 carries the element Tam2 within the gene. The Tam1 element has previously been extensively characterised. Here the Tam2 element is further characterised, and the arrangement of the nivea locus in paramutant plants is analysed. The complete sequence of Tam2, and that of a partial cDNA complementary to it, have been determined. The cDNA is probably transcribed from a different copy of Tam2 from that present at the nivea locus, and does not encode a functional protein. Genomic Southerns of F1 plants from the 53/44 cross show that no major rearrangements are consistently associated with paramutation at the nivea locus of A. majus. The isolation from a paramutant plant arising from a 53/44 cross of an allele (niv-4432) resulting from the excision of Tam2 is reported. The excision of Tam2 resulted in a 32 bp deletion of chs gene sequences. Plants homozygous for the new niv-4432 allele have white flowers and are still paramutagenic, demonstrating that Tam2 need not be present at the nivea locus for paramutation to occur. Different interactions between Tam1 and Tam2 are discussed, and a possible model for paramutation is presented.

Key words

Tam1 Tam2 Paramutation DNA rearrangement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benton WD, Davis RW (1977) Screening lambda gt recombinant clones by hybridization to single plaques in situ. Science 196:180–182Google Scholar
  2. Bonas U, Sommer H, Harrison BJ, Saedler H (1984a) The transposable element Tam1 of Antirrhinum majus is 17 kb long. Mol Gen Genet 194:138–143Google Scholar
  3. Bonas U, Sommer H, Saedler H (1984b) The 17-kb Tam1 element of Antirrhinum majus induces a 3-bp duplication upon integration into the chalcone synthase gene. EMBO J 3:1015–1019Google Scholar
  4. Breathnach R, Chambon P (1981) Organization and expression of eukaryotic split genes coding for proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 50:349–383Google Scholar
  5. Brink RA (1973) Paramutation. Annu Rev Genet 7:129–152Google Scholar
  6. Brink RA, Styles ED, Axtell JD (1968) Paramutation: Directed genetic change. Science 159:161–170Google Scholar
  7. Brown DF, Brink RA (1960) Paramutagenic action of paramutant Rr and Rg alleles in maize. Genetics 45:1313–1316Google Scholar
  8. Burd FJ, Wells RD (1974) Synthesis and characterization of the duplex block polymer d(C15A15).(T15G15). J Biol Chem 249:7094–7101Google Scholar
  9. Devereux J, Haeberli P, Smithies O (1984) A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res 12:387–395Google Scholar
  10. Döring H-P, Starlinger P (1984) Barbara McClintock's controlling elements: Now at the DNA level. Cell 39:253–259Google Scholar
  11. Englund PT (1971) Analysis of nucleotide sequences at 3′ termini of duplex deoxyribonucleic acid with the use of the T4 deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase. J Biol Chem 246:3269–3276Google Scholar
  12. Gubler U, Hoffman BJ (1983) A simple and very efficient method for generating cDNA libraries. Gene 25:263–269Google Scholar
  13. Hagemann R, Berg W (1977) Vergleichende Analyse der Paramutationssysteme bei höheren Pflanzen. Biol Zentralblatt 96:257–301Google Scholar
  14. Harrison BJ, Carpenter R (1973) A comparison of the instabilities at the nivea and pallida loci in Antirrhinum majus. Heredity 31:309–323Google Scholar
  15. Hehl R, Sommer H, Saedler H (1987) Interaction between the Tam1 and Tam2 transposable elements of Antirrhinum majus. Mol Gen Genet 207:47–53Google Scholar
  16. Henikoff S (1984) Unidirectional digestion with exonuclease III creates targeted breakpoints for DNA sequencing. Gene 28:351–359Google Scholar
  17. Hohn B (1979) In vitro packaging of lambda and cosmid DNA. Methods Enzymol 68:299–309Google Scholar
  18. Hudson A, Carpenter R, Coen ES (1987) De novo activation of the transposable element Tam2 of Antirrhinum majus. Mol Gen Genet 207:54–59Google Scholar
  19. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular Cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Maxam AM, Gilbert W (1980) Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages. Methods Enzymol 65:499–560Google Scholar
  21. Meinkoth J, Wahl G (1984) Hybridization of nucleic acids on solid supports. Anal Biochem 138:267–284Google Scholar
  22. Murray NE (1983) Phage lambda and molecular cloning. In: Hendrix RW, Roberts JW, Stahl FW, Weisberg RA (eds) Lambda II. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, pp 395–432Google Scholar
  23. Nevers P, Shepherd NS, Saedler H (1986) Plant transposable elements. Adv Bot Res 12:103–203Google Scholar
  24. Norrander J, Kempe T, Messing J (1983) Construction of improved M13 vectors using oligodeoxyribonucleotide-directed mutagenesis. Gene 26:101–106Google Scholar
  25. Pereira A, Schwarz-Sommer Zs, Gierl A, Bertram I, Peterson PA, Saedler H (1985) Genetic and molecular analysis of the Enhancer (En) transposable element system of Zea mays. EMBO J 4:17–23Google Scholar
  26. Reed R, Maniatis T (1986) A role for exon sequences and splice-site proximity in splice-site selection. Cell 46:681–690Google Scholar
  27. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR (1977) DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5463–5467Google Scholar
  28. Schwarz-Sommer Zs, Gierl A, Kloesgen RB, Wienand U, Peterson PA, Saedler H (1984) The Spm (En) transposable element controls the excision of a 2-kb DNA insert at the wxm-8 allele of Zea mays. EMBO J 3:1021–1028Google Scholar
  29. Schwarz-Sommer Zs, Shepherd N, Tacke E, Gierl A, Rohde W, Leclercq L, Mattes M, Berndtgen R, Peterson PA, Saedler H (1987) Influence of transposable elements on the structure and function of the A1 gene of Zea mays. EMBO J 6:287–294Google Scholar
  30. Sommer H, Saedler H (1986) Structure of the chalcone synthase gene of Antirrhinum majus. Mol Gen Genet 202:429–434Google Scholar
  31. Spribille R, Forkmann G (1982) Genetic control of chalcone synthase activity in flowers of Antirrhinum majus. Phytochem 21:2231–2234Google Scholar
  32. Stüber K (1986) Nucleic acid secondary structure prediction and display. Nucleic Acids Res 14:317–326Google Scholar
  33. Sutton WD, Gerlach WL, Schwartz D, Peacock WJ (1984) Molecular analysis of Ds controlling element mutations at the AdhI locus of maize. Science 223:1265–1268Google Scholar
  34. Taylor B, Powell A (1982) Isolation of plant DNA and RNA. Bethesda Research Laboratory Focus 4:4–6Google Scholar
  35. Upadhyaya KC, Sommer H, Krebbers E, Saedler H (1985) The paramutagenic line niv-44 has a 5 kb insert, Tam2, in the chalcone synthase gene of Antirrhinum majus. Mol Gen Genet 199:201–207Google Scholar
  36. Wartell RM, Reznikoff WS (1980) Cloning DNA restriction endonuclease fragments with protruding single-stranded ends. Gene 9:307–319Google Scholar
  37. Wienand U, Schwarz Zs, Feix G (1979) Electrophoretic elution of nucleic acids from gels adapted for subsequent biological tests. FEBS Lett 98:319–323Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enno Krebbers
    • 1
  • Reinhard Hehl
    • 1
  • Ralf Piotrowiak
    • 1
  • Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig
    • 1
  • Hans Sommer
    • 1
  • Heinz Saedler
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für ZüchtungsforschungKöln 30Federal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations