Oecologia

, Volume 102, Issue 3, pp 296–304 | Cite as

Interpopulation variation in prey use and feeding biomechanics in Caribbean triggerfishes

  • Ralph G. Turingan
  • Peter C. Wainwright
  • Dannie A. Hensley
Original Paper

Abstract

The relationships between prey utilization and jaw biomechanics were explored in two Caribbean populations (La Parguera and Mona Island) of four trigger-fishes. The volumetric contribution of major prey types and six biomechanical features of the jaws that characterize biting strength were contrasted between populations. At Mona, Xanthichthys ringens ate 45% benthic organisms, whereas conspecifics at La Parguera fed exclusively on plankton. Balistes vetula at Mona consumed 63% soft and nonelusive invertebrates, in contrast to their La Parguera conspecifics, which consumed 62% hard prey. Differences in diet between populations were associated with differences in jaw biomechanics. Xanthichthys at Mona had jaw muscles, bones, and closing-lever ratios larger than those of fish at La Parguera, indicating a stronger bite. Balistes at Mona had 50% smaller jaw bones, muscles, and closing-lever ratios than their La Parguera conspecifics, indicating a weaker but swifter bite. Melichthys niger and Cantherhines macrocerus ate similar prey at the two locations and showed little difference in trophic anatomy. We hypothesize that the interpopulation differences in morphology are induced by the activities of feeding on different prey and enhance the feeding ability of fishes for locally dominant prey. Plasticity of the feeding mechanism may be a widespread attribute of fish feeding systems that promotes the ability of species to occupy multiple habitat types successfully.

Key words

Diet Ecomorphology Functional morphology Tetraodontiformes Trophic morphology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barel CDN (1983) Towards a constructional morphology of cichlid fishes (Teleostei, Perciformes). Neth J Zool 33: 357–424Google Scholar
  2. Beecher RM, Corruccini RS, Freeman M (1983) Craniofacial correlates of dietary consistency in a nonhuman primate. J Craniofacial Genet Dev Biol 3: 193–202Google Scholar
  3. Bouvier M, Hylander WL (1981) Effect of bone strain on cortical bone structure in macaques (Macaca mulatta). J Morphol 167: 1–12Google Scholar
  4. Calow LJ, Alexander RM (1973) A mechanical analysis of a hind leg of a frog (Rana temporaria). J Zool Lond 171: 293–321Google Scholar
  5. Currey J (1984) The mechanical adaptations of bones. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  6. Ehlinger TJ (1990) Habitat choice and phenotype-limited feeding efficiency in bluegill: individual differences and trophic polymorphism. Ecology 71: 886–896Google Scholar
  7. Gatz AJ (1979) Community organization in fishes as indicated by morphological features. Ecology 60: 711–718Google Scholar
  8. Goldspink G (1983) Alterations in myofibrilar size and structure during growth, exercise, and changes in environmental temperature. In: Skeletal muscle, section 10. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 539–554Google Scholar
  9. Goldspink G, Howells K (1974) Work-induced hypertrophy in exercise normal muscles of different ages and the reversibility of hypertrophy after cessation of exercise. J Physiol Lond 239: 179–193Google Scholar
  10. Greenwood PH (1965) Environmental effects on the pharyngeal mill of a cichlid fish, Astatoreochromis alluadi and their taxonomic implications. Proc Linn Soc Lond 176: 1–10Google Scholar
  11. Herring SW (1993) Epigenetic and functional influences on skull growth. In: Hanken J, Hall BK (eds) The skull, vol 1. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. nn, pp 155–206Google Scholar
  12. Hoogerhoud RJC (1986) Taxonomic and ecological aspects of morphological plasticity in molluscivorous haplochromines (Pisces, Cichlidae). Ann Mus Afr Cent Sci Zool 251: 131–134Google Scholar
  13. Karr JR, James FC (1975) Eco-morphological configurations and convergent evolution of species and communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 258–29Google Scholar
  14. Lanyon LE, Rubin CT (1985) Functional adaptation in skeletal structures. In: Hildebrand M, Bramble DM, Liem KF, Wake DB (eds) Functional vertebrate morphology. Belknap, Cambridge, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  15. Lauder GV (1983) Functional and morphological bases of trophic specialization in sunfishes (Teleostei: Centrarchidae). J Morphol 178: 1–21Google Scholar
  16. Lavin PA, McPhail JD (1986) Adaptive divergence of trophic phenotypes among freshwater populations of the threespine sticklebach (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43: 2455–2463Google Scholar
  17. Lindsey CC (1981) Stocks are chameleons: plasticity of gill rakers of coregonid fishes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38: 1497–1506Google Scholar
  18. Meyer A (1987) Phenotypic plasticity and heterochrony in Cichlasoma managuense (Pisces, Cichlidae) and their implications for selection in cichlid fishes. Evolution 41: 1357–1369Google Scholar
  19. Meyer A (1989) Cost of morphological specialization: feeding performance of the two morphs in the trophically polymorphic cichlid fish, Cichlasoma citrinellum. Oecologia 80: 431–436Google Scholar
  20. Meyer A (1990) Ecological and evolutionary aspects of the trophic polymorphism in Cichlasoma citrinellum (Pisces, Cichlidae). Biol J Linn Soc 39: 279–299Google Scholar
  21. Mittelbach GG, Osenberg CW, Wainwright PC (1992) Variation in resource abundance affects diet and feeding morphology in the pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus). Oecologia 90: 8–13Google Scholar
  22. Moore WJ (1965) Masticatory function and skull growth. J Zool Lond 146: 123–131Google Scholar
  23. Norton SF (1991) Capture success and diet of cottid fishes: the role of predator morphology and attack kinematics. Ecology 72: 1807–1819Google Scholar
  24. Osenberg CW, Mittelbach GG (1989) Effects of body size on the predator-prey interaction between pumpkinseed sunfish and gastropods. Ecol Monogr 59: 405–432Google Scholar
  25. Osenberg EW, Mittelbach GG, Wainwright PC (1992) Two-stage life histories in fish: the interaction between juvenile competition and adult performance. Ecology 73: 255–267Google Scholar
  26. Powell P, Roy RR, Kanim P, Bello MA, Edgerton V (1984) Predictability of skeletal muscle tension from architectural determinations in guinea pig hindlimbs. J Appl Physiol 57: 1715–1721Google Scholar
  27. Ricklefs ER, Miles DB (1994) Ecological and evolutionary inferences from morphology: an ecological perspective. In: Wainwright PC, Reilly SM (eds) Ecological morphology: integrative organismal biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 13–41Google Scholar
  28. Robinson BW, Wilson DS, Margosian AS, Lotito PT (1993) Ecological and morphological differentiation of pumpkinseed sunfish in lakes without bluegill sunfish. Evol Ecol 7: 451–464Google Scholar
  29. Scheiner SM (1993) Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24: 35–68Google Scholar
  30. Schlichting C (1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17: 667–693Google Scholar
  31. Skulason S, Noakes DLG, Snorrason SS (1989) Ontogeny of trophic morphology in four sympatric morphs of arctic charr Salvilinus alpinus in Thingvallavatn, Iceland. Biol J Linn Soc 38: 281–301Google Scholar
  32. Smith DW (1981) Mechanical forces and patterns of deformation. In: Connelly TG, Brinkly LL, Carlson BM (eds) Morphogenesis and pattern formation. Raven, New York, pp 215–223Google Scholar
  33. Stearns SC (1989) The evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity. BioScience 39: 436–445Google Scholar
  34. Travis J (1994) Evaluating the adaptive role of morphological plasticity. In: Wainwright PC, Reilly SM (eds) Ecological morphology: integrative organismal biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 99–122Google Scholar
  35. Turingan RG (1994) Ecomorphological relationships among Caribbean tetraodontiform fishes. J Zool Lond 233: 493–521Google Scholar
  36. Turingan RG, Wainwright PC (1993) Morphological and functional bases of durophagy in the queen triggerfish, Balistes vetula (Pisces, Tetraodontiformes). J Morphol 215: 101–118Google Scholar
  37. Via S, Lande R (1985) Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of acquired characters. Evolution 39: 505–522Google Scholar
  38. Wainwright PC (1987) Biomechanical limits to ecological performance: mollusc-crushing by the Caribbean hogfish, Lachnolaimus maximus (Labridae). J Zool Lond 213: 283–297Google Scholar
  39. Wainwright PC (1988) Morphology and ecology: functional basis of feeding constraints in Caribbean labrid fishes. Ecology 69: 635–645Google Scholar
  40. Wainwright PC, Richard BA (1995) Predicting patterns of prey use from morphology in fishes. Environ Biol Fishes (in press)Google Scholar
  41. Wainwright PC, Osenberg CW, Mittelbach GG (1991) Trophic polymorphism in the pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus Linnaeus): effects of environment on ontogeny. Funct Ecol 5: 40–55Google Scholar
  42. Westneat MW (1995) Phylogenetic systematics and biomechanics in ecomorphology. Environ Biol Fishes (in press)Google Scholar
  43. Wheelwright NT (1985) Fuit size, gape width, and the drets of fruit-eating birds. Ecology 66: 808–818Google Scholar
  44. Williams CK, Moore RJ (1989) Phenotypic adaptation and natural selection in the wild rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus, in Australia. J Anim Ecol 58: 495–508Google Scholar
  45. Wimberger PH (1991) Plasticity of jaw and skull morphology in the neotropical cichlids Geophagus brasiliensis and G. steindachneri. Evolution 45: 1545–1563Google Scholar
  46. Winemiller KO (1991) Ecomorphological diversification in lowland freshwater fish assemblages from five biotic regions. Ecol Monogr 61: 343–365Google Scholar
  47. Winterbottom R (1974) The familial phylogeny of the Tetraodontiformes (Acanthopterygii: Pisces) as evidenced by their comparative myology. Smithson Contrib Zool 155: 1–201Google Scholar
  48. Wolff JD (1892) Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. Hirschwald, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  49. Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97–159Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralph G. Turingan
    • 1
  • Peter C. Wainwright
    • 1
  • Dannie A. Hensley
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biological ScienceFlorida State UniversityTallahassecUSA
  2. 2.Department of Marine SciencesUniversity of Puerto RicoMayaguezUSA

Personalised recommendations