Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 106, Issue 4, pp 478–481 | Cite as

A new plant-animal mutualism involving a plant with sticky leaves and a resident hemipteran insect

  • A. G. Ellis
  • J. J. Midgley
Article

Abstract

We report on a new plant-animal mutualism in which the plant Roridula gorgonias, first suspected by Darwin (1875) to be carnivorous, is, at least in part, indirectly carnivorous. This plant has sticky leaves which trap many insects but it has no digestive enzymes. Instead, trapped invertebrates are rapidly consumed by a hemipteran Pameridea roridulae, only found on this plant. However, evidence from δ15N experiments suggests that R. gorgonias does derive significant amounts of nitrogen from trapped prey, apparently via exudations of P. roridulae.

Key words

Roridula gorgonias Carnivorous plant Hemipterans 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Darwin C (1975) Insectivorous plants. John Murray, London Clancy FG, Coffey MD (1977) Acid phosphatase and protease release by the insectivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia. Can J Bot 55:480–488Google Scholar
  2. Deleens E, Cliquet JB, Prioul JL (1994) Use of 13C and 15N plant label near natural abundance for monitoring carbon and nitrogen partitioning. Aust J Plant Physiol 21:133–146Google Scholar
  3. Dixon KW, Pate J, Bailey WJ (1980) Nitrogen nutrition of the tuberous sundew Drosera erythrorhiza with special reference to catch of arthropod fauna by its glandular leaves. Aust J Bot 283–297Google Scholar
  4. Dolling WR, Palmer JM (1991) Pameridea (Hemiptera:Miridae): predaceous bugs specific to the highly viscid plant genus Roridula. Syst Entomol 16:319–328Google Scholar
  5. Friday L, Quarmby C (1994) Uptake and translocation of prey derived from 15N and 32P in Utricularia vulgaris. New Phytol 126:273–281Google Scholar
  6. Givnish TJ, Burkhardt EL, Happel RE, Weintraub RJ (1984) Carnivory in the bromeliad Brocchinia reducta, with a cost/benefit model for the general restriction of carnivorous plants to sunny, moist, nutrient-poor habitats. Am Nat 124:479–497Google Scholar
  7. Heslop-Harrison Y, Knox RB (1971) A cytochemical study of the leaf-gland enzymes of insectivorous plants of the genus Pinguicula. Planta 96:183–211Google Scholar
  8. Juniper BE, Robins RJ, Joel DM (1989) The carnivorous plants. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Lloyd FE (1934) Is Roridula carnivorous? Can J Res 10:780–786Google Scholar
  10. Lloyd FE (1942) The carnivorous plants. Ronald, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Marloth R (1903) Some recent observations on the biology of Roridula. Ann Bot 17:151–157Google Scholar
  12. Marloth R (1910) Further observations on the biology of Roridula. Trans Soc SA 2:59–61Google Scholar
  13. Schulze ED, Gebauer G, Schulze W, Pate JS (1991) The utilisation of nitrogen from insect capture by different growth forms of Drosera from southeast Australia. Oecologia 87:240–246Google Scholar
  14. Stock WD, Wienand KT, Baker AC (1995) Impacts of invading N2-fixing Acacia species on patterns of nutrient cycling in two Cape ecosystems: evidence from soil incubation studies and 15N natural abundance values. Oecologia 101:375–382Google Scholar
  15. Verbeek NAM, Boasson R (1993) Relationship between types of prey captured and growth form in Drosera in southwestern Australia. Aust J Ecol 18:203–207Google Scholar
  16. Woodward TE, Evans JW, Eastop VF (1970) The insects of Australia. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, pp 203–207Google Scholar
  17. Zamora R (1990) The feeding ecology of a carnivorous plant: prey analysis and capture constraints. Oecologia 84:376–379Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. G. Ellis
    • 1
  • J. J. Midgley
    • 1
  1. 1.Botany DepartmentUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations